Activepieces vs Make
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Activepieces | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Open-source, AI-first automation for developers, privacy-conscious teams, and enterprises needing self-hosting and governance. | Non-technical users and small businesses building complex multi-step workflows with a visual canvas and 2000+ integrations. |
| Pricing | Freemium: Free (1k tasks/mo), Pro ($10/mo for 10k tasks), Self-Hosted ($0 unlimited tasks). | Freemium: Free (1k ops/mo, 2 scenarios), Core ($9/mo for 10k ops), Pro ($16/mo with custom functions). |
| Setup complexity | Easy for developers; self-hosting requires technical skills. Visual builder with AI agent builder reduces complexity for AI workflows. | Very low – visual drag-and-drop with templates. Non-technical users can start within minutes. |
| Strongest differentiator | Open-source (MIT) with self-hosting, AI agent builder, and enterprise governance (SSO, RBAC, audit logs). | 2000+ integrations, advanced data transformation, and modular scenario design – ideal for complex business logic. |
| Integration count | 704+ integrations (community pieces marketplace). | 2000+ app integrations. |
| AI capabilities | Built-in AI agent builder, AI adoption analytics, gamification, and MCP servers. | AI modules (e.g., OpenAI) but no native AI agent building. |
Activepieces vs Make: For teams prioritizing open-source flexibility, AI agent building, and enterprise self-hosting, Activepieces wins in 2026. Its free self-hosted tier with unlimited tasks and AI-native features (agent builder, adoption analytics) outpaces Make for developer-led and privacy-conscious teams. However, for non-technical users and small businesses needing a vast integration library (2000+) and intuitive scenario design, Make remains the better choice due to its lower learning curve and pre-built templates. The deciding factor is your team's technical capacity and need for AI automation – Activepieces leads there.
Feature-by-feature
Activepieces vs Make: Core Automation Capabilities
Both platforms offer visual workflow builders, but their approaches differ. Activepieces provides a flow builder with AI agent capabilities, allowing users to create agents that score leads or summarize meetings. It includes human approval steps and custom logic branching. Make excels in complex multi-step scenarios with sub-scenarios, error handling, and data transformation tools. For pure automation complexity, Make wins here because it allows modular design and reusable modules that handle intricate business logic without coding.
AI/Model Approach: Activepieces vs Make
Activepieces is AI-first, featuring a dedicated AI agent builder, AI adoption analytics, and gamification to drive team usage. It supports MCP servers and tables for extending AI functionality. Make offers AI modules (e.g., OpenAI) for tasks like content generation, but lacks a native agent builder. Activepieces wins for teams wanting to build and deploy AI agents, as of 2026.
Integrations & Ecosystem: Activepieces vs Make
Make offers over 2000 app integrations (Google Workspace, Shopify, HubSpot, etc.) and a large community. Activepieces has 704+ integrations but compensates with a community pieces marketplace and open-source extensibility. Self-hosting allows custom integrations. Make wins on sheer integration count and breadth, making it better for connecting many niche apps.
Performance & Scale: Activepieces versus Make
Activepieces' self-hosted edition supports unlimited tasks, making it scalable for high-volume needs, but performance depends on infrastructure. Make's cloud platform handles up to millions of operations, but free and low-tier plans have operation limits. Activepieces' self-hosting offers better scalability for enterprises with control, while Make's cloud is simpler for small businesses.
Developer Experience: Activepieces compared to Make
Activepieces is open-source (MIT), appealing to developers who want to modify the code, contribute, or self-host. It provides enterprise features like SSO, RBAC, and audit logs. Make offers custom functions and API connections but is closed-source. Developers preferring flexibility and control will favor Activepieces; non-developers find Make's interface more accessible.
Pricing compared
Activepieces pricing (2026)
Activepieces offers a freemium model with three tiers: Free ($0 – 1,000 tasks/month, community pieces, cloud hosted); Pro ($10/month – 10,000 tasks, premium support, custom domains); Self-Hosted ($0 – unlimited tasks, full control, community support). No overage fees are mentioned for the self-hosted plan; cloud plans may have additional costs for exceeding task limits. The free tier allows up to 10 active flows.
Make pricing (2026)
Make also uses freemium pricing: Free ($0 – 1,000 operations/month, 2 scenarios); Core ($9/month – 10,000 operations, unlimited scenarios); Pro ($16/month – custom functions, priority support). No hidden costs are listed, but operation overages likely apply. The free tier severely restricts scenario count.
Value-per-dollar: Activepieces vs Make
For budget-conscious users, Activepieces' self-hosted plan offers unlimited tasks at $0, unmatched value. However, it requires infrastructure. For cloud users, Make's Pro at $16/month provides custom functions and more operations (10k) than Activepieces Pro (10k tasks at $10). Activepieces wins for teamss that self-host. Make wins for non-technical users needing cheap cloud automation with more operations per dollar, as of 2026.
Who should pick which
- Developer team needing self-hosted AI agentsPick: Activepieces
Activepieces open-source self-hosted edition gives unlimited tasks and full control, plus a built-in AI agent builder for custom AI workflows.
- Small business owner automating marketing workflowsPick: Make
Make's 2000+ integrations and intuitive visual builder let non-technical users connect tools like Facebook Ads and Mailchimp without coding.
- Enterprise IT with compliance requirementsPick: Activepieces
Activepieces offers enterprise SSO, RBAC, audit logs, and self-hosting, meeting data governance needs.
- Freelancer building complex multi-step scenariosPick: Make
Make's sub-scenarios, error handling, and custom functions handle intricate logic at $16/month.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Activepieces and Make?
Activepieces is an open-source, AI-first platform ideal for developers and enterprises needing self-hosting and AI agents. Make is a closed-source visual automation platform with 2000+ integrations, better for non-technical users.
Which is cheaper: Activepieces or Make?
If you self-host, Activepieces is free with unlimited tasks. For cloud, Make's Core ($9/mo for 10k ops) is slightly cheaper than Activepieces Pro ($10/mo for 10k tasks). But Activepieces Pro includes premium support and custom domains.
Can I self-host Activepieces?
Yes, Activepieces offers a free Community Edition (MIT license) for self-hosting, giving full data control and unlimited tasks.
Does Make support AI agents?
Make offers AI modules (e.g., OpenAI) for tasks like content generation, but it does not have a dedicated AI agent builder like Activepieces.
Which platform has more integrations?
Make has over 2000 app integrations, while Activepieces has 704+. However, Activepieces' open-source community and marketplace allow expanding integrations.
Is Activepieces suitable for non-technical users?
Activepieces has a visual builder but is geared toward developers and teams comfortable with self-hosting. Make is more beginner-friendly for non-technical users.
Can I migrate workflows from Make to Activepieces?
There is no built-in migration tool. Workflows would need to be recreated manually in Activepieces' visual builder.
Which platform is better for enterprise compliance?
Activepieces wins with enterprise SSO, RBAC, audit logs, and self-hosting. Make lacks these features, making Activepieces the choice for regulated industries.
What are the free tier limits?
Activepieces Free: 1,000 tasks/month, 10 active flows. Make Free: 1,000 operations/month, 2 scenarios.
Which tool is better for AI-powered automation in 2026?
Activepieces is the clear winner for AI-first automation due to its AI agent builder, adoption analytics, and gamification features.
Last reviewed: May 12, 2026