Activepieces vs n8n
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Activepieces | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier: 10 active flows; $5/active flow/month | Free tier: 5 active workflows (cloud); self-hosted free; paid cloud plans from $10/month |
| Integrations | 700+ integrations | 500+ pre-built integrations + custom API nodes |
| AI Features | AI agents with custom instructions; AI agent library (Lead Scorer, Deal Closer) | AI agent builder supporting multi-agent and RAG; AI evaluation; MCP support |
| Target User | Non-technical teams, sales, marketing, support | Technical teams: IT Ops, Dev, SecOps |
| Self-Hosting | Yes (Docker, Helm, any cloud) | Yes (Docker, on-prem, cloud) |
| Latest News | 2026-04 guides on AI agent security and B2B sales automation | 2026-06 coverage of A2A protocol and data leak prevention node |
If you're a sales or marketing team wanting a no-code, AI-first automation platform with predictable pricing, pick Activepieces. If you're a technical team needing flexible, code-friendly workflows with advanced AI orchestration (multi-agent, RAG), n8n is the better choice. Activepieces is cheaper for many flows ($5/flow vs n8n's tiered pricing) but n8n offers deeper customization and developer control.
Open-source AI-first automation platform for teams building workflows and agents visually
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- Sales/Marketing teamPick: Activepieces
Activepieces offers pre-built AI agents for lead scoring and sales automation, plus 700+ integrations (HubSpot, Gmail, Stripe) and a simpler drag-and-drop builder.
- IT Ops / DevSecOps teamPick: n8n
n8n provides advanced code support, version control, LDAP, and multi-agent/RAG capabilities needed for complex enterprise automation and incident response.
- Solo founder building AI workflowsPick: Activepieces
Activepieces' free tier (10 flows) and low per-flow cost are budget-friendly, and its AI agent library accelerates common automation tasks without coding.
- Enterprise needing on-prem AI orchestrationPick: n8n
n8n's full source availability, git-based diffs, and MCP support enable deep customization and integration into existing DevOps pipelines with strong security controls.
- Non-technical team automating HR/onboardingPick: Activepieces
Activepieces' gamification and simpler UI are better for driving adoption among non-technical users, and its 700+ integrations cover common HR tools.
Frequently Asked Questions
Activepieces vs n8n: which should you choose?
If you're a sales or marketing team wanting a no-code, AI-first automation platform with predictable pricing, pick Activepieces. If you're a technical team needing flexible, code-friendly workflows with advanced AI orchestration (multi-agent, RAG), n8n is the better choice. Activepieces is cheaper for many flows ($5/flow vs n8n's tiered pricing) but n8n offers deeper customization and developer control.
Which platform has more integrations?
Activepieces boasts 700+ integrations, while n8n offers 500+ pre-built integrations plus custom API nodes for any service. Activepieces covers more popular apps out of the box.
Can I self-host both tools?
Yes, both support self-hosting. Activepieces can be deployed via Docker, Helm, or any cloud. n8n offers Docker-based self-hosting and full source code on GitHub.
Which is better for AI agents?
Activepieces provides easy-to-use pre-built AI agents (Lead Scorer, Deal Closer) and custom instructions. n8n supports multi-agent orchestration, RAG, and AI evaluation, giving more control to developers.
Which is cheaper for 50 active flows?
Activepieces would cost $250/month (50 flows × $5). n8n's cloud pricing varies: the Pro plan ($20/month) covers 20 workflows, so you'd need multiple accounts or self-host. Self-hosting n8n is free but requires infrastructure.
Do both support human approvals?
Yes, both have human-in-the-loop approvals. Activepieces includes it as a standard feature; n8n also offers approval steps and human-in-the-loop guardrails.
Which is better for non-technical users?
Activepieces is more beginner-friendly with a simpler drag-and-drop builder, pre-built AI agents, and gamification to drive adoption. n8n has a steeper learning curve but offers more flexibility for technical users.
What are the latest notable features?
For Activepieces: recent guides on AI agent security and B2B sales automation. For n8n: support for Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol and a community node for data leak prevention within the execution graph.
Which has better enterprise security features?
Both offer RBAC, SSO/SAML, and audit logs. Activepieces adds SCIM provisioning and advanced RBAC. n8n adds LDAP, encrypted secrets, and log streaming, making it stronger for strict compliance environments.
More Activepieces or n8n comparisons
If you're a large enterprise already on ServiceNow and need a compliant, omnichannel assistant that deflects tickets out of the box, Moveworks is the obvious choice—but expect a sales cycle and enterp
Choose Dify if your primary need is building RAG-powered AI agents and workflows with a visual builder, especially for customer support chatbots requiring human review and team template sharing. Choos
If you're automating processes, connecting 500+ services, or orchestrating AI agents with full traceability, pick n8n. If you're building internal CRUD apps and dashboards on your own data, Appsmith i
If you run an enterprise SOC drowning in 1000+ daily alerts and want autonomous triage with a learning memory, Torq is built for you—but you'll pay enterprise prices. If you're a technical team needin
For business teams wanting a polished, no-code canvas to connect thousands of SaaS apps with advanced visual logic, Make is the safer bet. For engineers and IT/SecOps teams who need self-hosting, code
If you’re an executive, sales, or marketing person who wants to fuel an AI agent from a chat prompt without dealing with code or infrastructure, choose AutoGPT — it even lands in Discord/Telegram now.
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: May 12, 2026