Crit vs Poke (Interaction Co.)

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCritPoke (Interaction Co.)
PricingFree (open-source-friendly)Free tier; Pro $19/mo; Ultra $199/mo
Primary UseLocal-first review tool for AI coding agent outputAI assistant in messaging apps for tasks & automations
PlatformLocal web app (browser)Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram, RCS
Target UserSolo developers, teams using AI coding agentsIndividuals, health enthusiasts, power users
Key IntegrationsClaude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, plus 10+ other coding agentsNotion, Oura, Gmail, Outlook, Todoist, TripIt
Latest News ImpactCrit v0.17.1 adds Chrome DevTools cookie sharing for live mode; v0.17.0 adds session finish hooksPoke now available on Apple Messages with rich actions; @poke.com email addresses

If you want an AI assistant that lives in your messaging apps to manage emails, calendar, and health data, Poke is the clear choice — especially with its new Apple Messages integration. If you need a dedicated review interface for AI-generated code (plans, diffs, live apps) and want to iterate faster with your coding agent, Crit is purpose-built and free. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you need task automation or code review.

Crit
Crit

PR-style line-level review for AI agent output — point at the line, tell the agent to fix it.

Visit Website
Poke (Interaction Co.)
Poke (Interaction Co.)

AI personal assistant that lives in your texts — Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram, and RCS

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$0/mo
$19/mo
$199/mo
Popularity
2 views
7.2k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Beginner-friendly
API Available
Platforms
CLIWeb
WebMobileAPI
Categories
🔎 Code Review & Quality
Productivity🤖 AI Assistants
Features
Line-level commenting on plans, diffs, live apps, and HTML
Markdown rendering for plans and docs
Branch and PR diff review with syntax highlighting
Stacked PR support for Git, jj, sapling
Live app proxy with DOM element commenting
Automatic reload in live mode
Static HTML iframe preview with asset sibling serving
No dev server needed for static HTML
One-click shareable reviews for async collaboration
Vim keybindings for keyboard-driven workflow
Chrome DevTools cookie sharing for live mode
Session finish hooks for custom agent instructions
File-based protocol for agent integration without API/plugins
GitLab merge request integration
Customizable keyboard shortcuts
Apple Messages integration (first verified AI product)
WhatsApp messaging with read receipts, typing indicators, and inline replies
Telegram messaging (excluding Italy and Brazil)
RCS messaging support
Email management: read, search, draft, send (Gmail & Outlook)
Calendar management: schedule, check availability, recurring events
Reminders via text or voice messages
Web search with verified sources
Notion integration: pages, databases, docs
Oura integration: sleep, readiness, activity
TripIt automation for travel plans
Generate tables and charts from data or images
PDF generation and editing with LaTeX formatting
Poke Recipes for automations and integration setup
Poke Kitchen for custom developer integrations
Integrations
Claude Code
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
OpenCode
Codex
Gemini CLI
Qwen Code
Hermes
Pi
Grok
Amp
Windsurf
Cline
Aider
GitLab
Notion
Oura
Gmail
Microsoft Outlook
Apple Messages
WhatsApp
Telegram
TripIt
Todoist
PostHog
Granola

What real users say: Crit vs Poke (Interaction Co.)

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Crit

97 mentions across 5 sources · 18% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube, Bluesky, Stack Overflow, Lemmy

What users praise

  • Local-first, no data leaves your machine unless shared.
  • Inline comments on plans, code diffs, live apps, and static HTML.
  • Four review modes cover plans, branches, live apps, and HTML artifacts.
  • Active development with frequent updates and responsive maintainer.

What frustrates them

  • Community feedback is extremely sparse beyond a few HN threads.
  • No evidence of enterprise reliability or large-scale use.
  • Browser-based workflow may not suit terminal/IDE purists.
  • Little to no discussion on Reddit, Product Hunt, or App Store.

Researched Jul 6, 2026

Poke (Interaction Co.)

19 mentions across 1 sources · 7% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • Integrates directly into iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram, and RCS.
  • Handles email, calendar, reminders, and web search from chat.
  • Verified source citations for web results increase trust.
  • Deep integrations with Notion, Oura, Gmail, Outlook, TripIt.

What frustrates them

  • No community feedback on Reddit, HN, or other major platforms.
  • Premium pricing at $19-$199/month may be steep.
  • Workflow setup (Poke Recipes) may confuse new users.
  • Edge-case file handling like spreadsheets is unproven.

Researched Jul 17, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Busy professional managing email and calendar
    Pick: Poke (Interaction Co.)

    Poke integrates directly into messaging apps (Apple Messages, WhatsApp) to manage Gmail/Outlook, schedule meetings, and set reminders — all via chat.

  • Solo developer using AI coding agents
    Pick: Crit

    Crit provides a local, browser-based review interface for agent-generated code diffs, plans, and live apps, with inline commenting and session finish hooks.

  • Health enthusiast tracking sleep and activity
    Pick: Poke (Interaction Co.)

    Poke's Oura integration lets you check sleep, readiness, and activity data without opening the Oura app.

  • Team iterating on AI-generated code
    Pick: Crit

    Crit's shareable reviews and one-click sharing enable async collaboration on agent output, with no data leaving local machine unless shared.

  • User wanting proactive automations
    Pick: Poke (Interaction Co.)

    Poke's Pro/Ultra plans offer proactive automations via Recipes, enabling hands-free task management.

Frequently Asked Questions

Crit vs Poke (Interaction Co.): which should you choose?

If you want an AI assistant that lives in your messaging apps to manage emails, calendar, and health data, Poke is the clear choice — especially with its new Apple Messages integration. If you need a dedicated review interface for AI-generated code (plans, diffs, live apps) and want to iterate faster with your coding agent, Crit is purpose-built and free. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you need task automation or code review.

Can I use Poke for code review?

No — Poke is a task assistant for messaging apps, not a code review tool. Use Crit for that.

Is Crit available on mobile?

Crit is a local web app that runs in a browser on your desktop; no mobile app.

Does Poke work with Apple Messages?

Yes — as of June 2026, Poke is available on Apple Messages with rich actions, verified as the first AI product on the platform.

Does Crit require an internet connection?

Crit is local-first — all processing happens on your machine unless you share a review.

Which coding agents does Crit support?

Crit integrates with Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode, Codex, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Hermes, Pi, Grok, Windsurf, Cline, and Aider.

Does Poke have a free tier?

Yes — a free tier with limited messages and no proactive automations.

Can I use Crit for non-AI diffs?

Yes — Crit works with any git diff, but is designed for the AI agent iteration loop.

Does Poke support Telegram?

Yes — as of February 2026, Poke works with Telegram (except in Italy and Brazil).

More Crit or Poke (Interaction Co.) comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026