Cursor vs Greptile

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-15
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCursorGreptile
PricingFree tier: limited; Pro: $20/mo; Business: $40/mo/user; Max: $60/mo/userFree tier: 5 reviews/mo; Pro: $15/mo (50 reviews); Flex: pay-per-use
Primary Use CaseAI-native IDE for autonomous codingAI code review with multi-file context
Code ReviewBasic PR review; focused on agent-generated codeAutomated, graph-based, swarm agents, TREX auto-tests
Agentic CapabilitiesFull agent: plan, code, test, deploy in sandboxed cloudReview-focused: multi-file analysis, auto-fix, MCP integration
Context & IntegrationVS Code-like IDE, CLI, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, mobile appMulti-repo clusters, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Zapier
Latest News ImpactiOS mobile app (Jun 2026); Customize page; Bugbot; reward hacking researchTREX public beta catches 20% more bugs; new CLI; multi-repo clusters

Choose Greptile if your priority is robust, context-aware code review with auto-test generation and multi-repo support. Choose Cursor if you want an AI-native IDE that lets agents autonomously build entire features. They're complementary—Greptile reviews code, Cursor writes it. For teams wanting both, integration via MCP exists.

Try CursorTry Greptile
Cursor
Cursor

AI coding agent that plans, builds, tests, and deploys software end-to-end.

Visit Website
Greptile
Greptile

AI code review agent that reviews every PR with full codebase context, runs tests via TREX, and learns your team's standards.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$20/mo
$20/mo
$20/mo
$40/user/mo
$40/user/mo
Custom
$0/mo
$30/seat/month
Custom
Popularity
3.1k views
3.7k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
DesktopCLIMobileAPI
WebCLI
Categories
🛠️ Autonomous Coding Agents💻 Code & Development🔎 Code Review & Quality
🔎 Code Review & Quality
Features
Composer for multi-file agentic tasks
Cloud agents in sandboxed environments
Automations for scheduled or triggered tasks
CLI terminal agent with curl install
Slack integration with plan-before-acting
GitHub PR review automation with merging
iOS app with voice input and push notifications (public beta)
iPad app with full PR review experience
Google Workspace plugins for Gmail, Drive, and Calendar
Cursor Router for intelligent model routing
Team marketplace for MCP servers and internal rules
Bugbot agentic code reviews
Side Chats and Conversation Search
Codebase indexing
Privacy mode to prevent training on code
Graph-based codebase indexing (files, functions, dependencies)
Swarm of parallel agents for multi-file impact analysis
Custom rules in plain English
Learns team standards from PR comments and reactions
TREX: autonomous test generation and execution in sandbox with evidence (logs, screenshots, videos)
One-click fix to Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin
Greptile MCP connector for any AI agent
Claude Code Plugin for auto-resolve
/greploop iteration with coding agents
Greptile CLI for terminal reviews with machine-readable output
Multi-repo context via Repo Clusters
Usage Limits to cap overage spend
Severity badges (P0/P1/P2) for triage
Self-hosted deployment (air-gapped in AWS with own LLM providers)
SOC 2 compliance, SSO/SAML, audit logs, dedicated support
Integrations
Slack
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Google Drive
Gmail
Google Calendar
Jira
Linear
Notion
JetBrains
Xcode
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex
Devin
Zapier

Who should pick which

  • Solo developer building a side project
    Pick: Cursor

    Cursor's free tier and autonomous agent mode can rapidly generate code. Greptile's review focus is less useful for small solo projects.

  • Engineering team catching multi-file bugs before production
    Pick: Greptile

    Greptile's graph-based swarm analysis and TREX auto-testing are specifically designed to catch cross-file logic errors at scale.

  • Startup wanting an all-in-one AI coding assistant
    Pick: Cursor

    Cursor provides IDE, agent, CLI, and mobile oversight—everything needed to accelerate development from planning to deployment.

  • Enterprise needing SOC 2 compliant code review
    Pick: Greptile

    Greptile offers self-hosted deployment and SOC 2 compliance, plus multi-repo clusters and custom rules for enterprise standards.

  • Developer who writes code and wants AI to review PRs
    Pick: Greptile

    Greptile integrates directly with GitHub/GitLab and automatically reviews every PR with full context—no developer effort needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cursor vs Greptile: which should you choose?

Choose Greptile if your priority is robust, context-aware code review with auto-test generation and multi-repo support. Choose Cursor if you want an AI-native IDE that lets agents autonomously build entire features. They're complementary—Greptile reviews code, Cursor writes it. For teams wanting both, integration via MCP exists.

Can Greptile and Cursor be used together?

Yes—Greptile offers one-click fixes to Cursor via MCP connector, so you can review with Greptile and fix with Cursor's agent.

Which tool has better AI models?

Cursor supports GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini, and xAI—multiple frontier models. Greptile uses its own models optimized for code review.

Does Greptile support self-hosting?

Yes, Greptile offers self-hosted, SOC 2 compliant deployment for enterprises. Cursor is cloud-only.

Does Cursor have a mobile app?

Yes, as of June 2026, Cursor launched an iOS app for remote oversight, voice input, and artifact review. Greptile has no mobile app.

Which tool is better for code review?

Greptile is purpose-built for code review with graph-based indexing, swarm agents, and TREX auto-tests. Cursor's review feature is basic.

Which tool is better for writing code?

Cursor is an AI-native IDE with autonomous agents that can write entire features. Greptile is a review tool, not a code generator.

Do both tools integrate with GitHub?

Yes, both integrate with GitHub. Greptile also integrates with GitLab, while Cursor adds Bitbucket, Vercel, and Azure DevOps.

What is TREX in Greptile?

TREX (public beta as of June 2026) is Greptile's autonomous test generation and execution feature that writes targeted tests for each PR and runs them in a sandbox.

More Cursor or Greptile comparisons

Claude vs Cursor comparison

Cursor wins for engineering teams that want to offload entire features to autonomous agents with deep IDE integration and automations. Claude is better for professionals needing long-context document

Cursor vs Locofy comparison

If you live in Figma and need pixel-true UI code fast, Locofy will save you hours of CSS drudgery—just budget for manual tweaks. But if you want an AI teammate that takes a Slack message all the way t

Cursor vs Lovable comparison

If you're a founder or PM who wants to turn an idea into a deployable app by chatting, Lovable is the fastest path — no code, one-click deploy, and connectors to data warehouses. If you're an engineer

Codeium vs Cursor comparison

If you need to orchestrate multiple agents across local and cloud environments with shared context, Codeium is your command center—especially with its free SWE-1.6 tier. But if you want an AI-first ID

Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody comparison

If your team lives in large, multi-repo codebases and needs deep code understanding with enterprise controls, Sourcegraph Cody is the pragmatic pick. But if you want an AI that takes a feature from id

Augment Code vs Cursor comparison

Choose Augment Code if you're an enterprise needing governed, multi-agent workflows across the SDLC with compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA). Choose Cursor if you're an individual dev or startup wanting an AI-n

Explore each tool further

Cursor
View Cursor reviewCursor alternatives
Greptile
View Greptile reviewGreptile alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Autonomous Coding Agents toolsBest AI Code Review & Quality toolsBest AI Code & Development tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: May 12, 2026