Cursor is live · free plan, paid from $8/mo · last verified 14 Nov 2026 · viability healthy
Cursor
Cursor is an agent-first coding platform that plans, builds, tests and reviews software across desktop, CLI, Slack and cloud agents.
Cursor is an agent platform that happens to ship an editor, and Premium at $30/mo is the real entry point: cloud agents, Origin hosting, Bugbot reviews and Grok Bot all start there, while the $8/mo Plus plan is an introductory Grok-only tier. Pay for it if your team ships PRs an agent can legitimately own. If you only want fast inline completion at the lowest price, GitHub Copilot is the different, cheaper purchase.
Verdict generatedVerified 2h ago · liveness 92/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/cursor
- Engineering teams that want agents planning, building and shipping features with human review
- Developers who want one subscription covering the agent-first editor, CLI, Slack and iOS
- Platform teams using Rollouts, Security Review and Bugbot to police every pull request
- Teams building internal agents as code with the Agent SDK, evals and agent-sdk deploy
- Beginners who want guided learning rather than an autonomous agent acting on their behalf
- Air-gapped or offline-only environments where cloud agents and the model router can't reach the network
- Teams that only need inline autocomplete at the lowest possible price
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Cursor if you only need inline autocomplete at the lowest possible price, or if your team has no appetite for triaging the pull requests fleets of parallel cloud agents will open.
Third-party model usage is not included in any monthly plan and is billed separately at API list price, so a heavy Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.6 session can cost more than the subscription itself
Premium at $30/mo is where Cursor becomes the product people describe: cloud agents, Origin, Bugbot and Grok Bot. Plus at $8/mo buys a Grok-only tier, and Super ($100/mo) / Ultra ($200/mo) buy usage multiples rather than features. Teams at $30+/user/month adds SSO, pooled usage and admin. Against GitHub Copilot's low-cost completion plans Cursor is the pricier, agent-heavy choice, and third-party model usage sits outside every price shown.
In short
Cursor — Cursor is an agent-first coding platform that plans, builds, tests and reviews software across desktop, CLI, Slack and cloud agents. Best for Engineering teams that want agents planning, building and shipping features with human review, Developers who want one subscription covering the agent-first editor, CLI, Slack and iOS, Platform teams using Rollouts, Security Review and Bugbot to police every pull request. Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo.
What is Cursor?
Cursor — Cursor is an agent-first coding platform that plans, builds, tests and reviews software across desktop, CLI, Slack and cloud agents. Best for Engineering teams that want agents planning, building and shipping features with human review, Developers who want one subscription covering the agent-first editor, CLI, Slack and iOS, Platform teams using Rollouts, Security Review and Bugbot to police every pull request. Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo.
Cursor is an agent-first coding platform for developers and engineering teams who would rather hand off a task than babysit inline completions. Describe the outcome and the agent plans it, edits across files, runs the build and tests on its own computer, and returns a walkthrough you can review. It runs in Cursor Desktop, Cursor CLI (cursor-agent), Slack and the Cursor iOS app, with PR reviews in GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket. The agent layer is where most of the product now sits. Cloud agents work autonomously and in parallel for hours or days. Build Live Apps in Cursor (Nov 5, 2026) lets a cloud agent scaffold a web app, stand up Postgres, wire Cursor SSO, run deterministic and agentic security checks, provision hosting and hand back a shareable link behind team sign-in. The Agent SDK (Oct 20, 2026) treats an agent as a folder — instructions.md, tools/, skills/, mcp-connections/ and channels/ — that you can eval locally and ship with agent-sdk deploy to Cursor or your own infrastructure. Real-time two-way voice chat with agents arrived Nov 6, 2026, running on Grok Voice in the Agents Window, IDE, web and iOS. Model choice is part of the pitch: the docs list Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Fable 5.2, GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.7 and Cursor's own Composer 2.5, with Auto routing per task. Governance features — Origin code hosting and its app marketplace, Rollouts per-environment change health, Security Review on PRs and Bugbot code reviews — target platform teams rather than individual coders. Against GitHub Copilot's completion-first positioning, Cursor is selling agents that open and review their own PRs; the honest evaluation is last-mile autonomy and review quality, not who wins on tab completion.
Key features
- Agentic coding in Cursor Desktop: hand off a task and review an editable multi-file result
- Cloud agents that build, test and demo features end to end on their own computers
- Build Live Apps in Cursor: agent scaffolds the app, sets up Postgres and Cursor SSO, runs security checks, provisions hosting and returns a shareable link (Nov 5, 2026)
- Realtime two-way voice chat with agents powered by Grok Voice, in the Agents Window, IDE, web and iOS (Nov 6, 2026)
- Agent SDK: define an agent as a folder with instructions.md, tools/, skills/, mcp-connections/ and channels/
- Agent SDK evals run locally or in CI; agent-sdk deploy publishes an agent to Cursor or your own infrastructure
- Grok Bot: bots that sign in to your tools, use them and return finished work
- Launch fleets of parallel cloud agents working for hours or days across repos
- Model picker across Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.7 and Composer 2.5, with Auto routing
- Code hosting via Origin with deployments, CI and a 20+ app marketplace including Cloudflare, Vercel, Sentry and Linear
- Bugbot AI code reviews and Security Review checks on pull requests
- Rollouts reports change health per environment on every PR
- Cursor CLI (cursor-agent) for terminal and headless/CI agent work
- Cursor iOS app to view and reply to local agents remotely, plus 'Hey Siri, call Cursor' to start a voice call
- Cmd+Shift+Space dictation in the IDE (separate from voice chat)
Behind the verdict
Cursor's pitch has moved almost entirely away from the editor. The three things shipped in the last month — Build Live Apps (Nov 5, 2026), the Agent SDK (Oct 20, 2026) and voice chat on Grok Voice (Nov 6, 2026) — are all about delegation, not typing assistance. Build Live Apps is the most concrete win: a cloud agent scaffolds the app, spins up Postgres, puts it behind Cursor SSO, runs secret-scanning and agentic security checks, then provisions hosting and returns a link. Nothing goes live until the checks pass and you publish, and admins can see every app and secret on the team. That is a genuine internal-tools story for ops, sales, legal and finance, not just engineering. The Agent SDK is the more strategic play: an agent is a folder with instructions.md, tools/, skills/, mcp-connections/ and channels/, testable with evals locally or in CI and deployable with a single command. Teams that already run Bugbot and Security Review on PRs get a coherent governance story on top. Where it gets expensive and complicated is the model layer. The Free tier is limited to constrained agent and chat requests. Plus at $8/mo is Grok-only — Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine and Build plus Grok API access — with no cloud agents, Origin or Bugbot. Third-party models only appear from Premium ($30/mo) up, and they are billed separately at API list price on top of the subscription at every level, including Super ($100/mo) and Ultra ($200/mo). Usage pools are expressed as multiples of Plus (4x, 15x, 50x), which makes cost forecasting fuzzy until you watch real usage. Prices exclude VAT and similar fees, and you must cancel at least 24 hours before renewal to avoid another charge. The operational risk is review debt. Fleets of parallel cloud agents working for hours or days produce pull requests faster than most teams can triage them, and Cursor gives you Rollouts, Security Review and Bugbot as the answer — but you have to actually run those gates. Buy Cursor if you have engineers or platform teams ready to own that review queue, and if internal tooling built by non-engineers behind SSO is a real need. Skip it if you want guided onboarding, need an air-gapped setup, or simply want autocomplete at the lowest possible price.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-13
Limitations
- Model availability is gated by plan: Free gives limited agent and chat requests, Plus ($8/mo) lists only Grok models, and third-party models appear from Premium ($30/mo) up — billed separately by usage at API list price on top of the subscription, on every tier including Super and Ultra.
- Each paid plan carries a fixed usage pool expressed as a multiple of Plus (Basic, 4x, 15x, 50x, or 4-50x pooled for Teams).
- Prices exclude taxes or fees such as VAT, and you must cancel at least 24 hours before renewal to avoid additional charges.
- Build Live Apps deploys from Cursor Origin and GitHub; the changelog says support for other git providers like GitLab is coming soon.
- Voice chat is a two-way conversation on Grok Voice and is distinct from dictation, which still just turns speech into text in the chat input.
as of 2026-11-14
Researching Cursor? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Cursor still active?
Cursor is live · free plan, paid from $8/mo · last verified 14 Nov 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Cursor? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What's new in Cursor
Checked todayAcross the latest 4 updates: 3 feature updates and 1 launch.
Voice Chat with Agents
Realtime two-way voice conversations with agents, powered by Grok Voice, available in the Agents Window, IDE, web and Cursor for iOS; dictation stays a separate feature.
Build Live Apps in Cursor
Cloud agents scaffold an app, set up Postgres and Cursor SSO, run security checks, provision hosting and return a shareable link, on paid plans with cloud agents.
Agent SDK
Agents are defined as a folder of code with instructions.md, tools/, skills/, mcp-connections/ and channels/, testable with evals and deployable via agent-sdk deploy.
Origin App Marketplace
Origin opens an app marketplace with 20+ apps for deployments, CI, code review, security, monitoring and project management from partners including Cloudflare, Vercel, Sentry and Linear.
What do users say about Cursor?
What people actually say about Cursor — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 8 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Bluesky, Stack Overflow, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Nov 13, 2026.
Weighted by the 119 posts each of 8 sources contributed.
- +Works as a genuine multi-model harness — run Claude, Grok, Gemini or Composer in one place
- +Cloud agents keep working while you're away, letting you ship from phone or laptop
- +Reviewers report it comprehends complex requirements and produces well-formatted solutions
- +Granular file-by-file control in the IDE appeals to developers who don't want full autonomy
- +Familiar VS Code foundation eases onboarding for existing editor users
- −Spending is opaque — reviewers warn it's easy to burn budget with no direction
- −Unified Cursor/Grok subscription cut limits and spiked effective cost
- −Mobile app loses long prompts and has persistent input glitches
- −GitHub sign-in 500 error left users locked out for over a week
- −First run silently scans the full Home folder without warning
- • No in-app spend dashboard — reviewers say usage is easy to burn through blind
- • The bundled Grok subscription is described by reviewers as effectively quadrupling cost with reduced limits
- • Premium models (Opus 5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol) consume allotments faster than Composer
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Cursor — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 14 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Cursor 128 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed pricing fit, our verdict, switching out, description, hidden costs, setup time, switching in, features, summary, integrations, who should skip it, models, pricing tiers, limitations
- — changed who should skip it, pricing tiers, features, description, integrations, our verdict, who it suits
- — changed limitations, models
- — changed who should skip it, use cases, features, hidden costs, switching in, pricing fit, summary, models, our verdict, switching out, limitations, description, setup time
- — changed who it suits, our verdict, pricing tiers, summary, integrations, features, description, platforms, models, limitations, pricing page
- — changed pricing page, limitations
Showing the 6 most recent of 128 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Cursor cost in 2026?
Cursor: Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo. Pricing last verified 14 Nov 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Cursor tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | A solo developer who wants to try agent edits before spending anything and can live with limited agent and chat requestsAdds: Free entry point: limited AI usage, limited agent and chat requests, limited Grok Chat, Imagine and Grok Build |
| Plus | $8/mo | monthly | A developer who mostly wants Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine and Build plus Grok API access at the lowest paid priceAdds: Adds a shared AI usage pool, full Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine and Build, and Grok API access — but only Grok models, with no cloud agents, Origin or Bugbot |
| Premium | $30/mo | monthly | An engineer or small team lead who wants cloud agents, hosted apps and automated PR review and can absorb third-party model chargesAdds: Adds 4x more usage than Plus, cloud agents and automations, Origin code hosting, Bugbot reviews, Grok Bot, video generation, faster chat responses and access to third-party models at API list price |
| Super | $100/mo | monthly | A heavy daily user running several cloud agents at once who needs priority access when models are contendedAdds: Adds 15x more usage than Plus and priority model access at peak times over Premium, with third-party models still billed separately |
| Ultra | $200/mo | monthly | A power user or small studio pushing parallel agents continuously and wanting new products and models firstAdds: Adds 50x more usage than Plus and earliest access to all products and models over Super, with third-party models still billed separately |
| Teams | From $30/user/moVendor: “$30+/user/mo” | monthly, per seat | An engineering org of any size that needs SSO, pooled usage, centralized billing and a marketplace for internal rules and pluginsAdds: Adds a pooled 4-50x Plus usage pool, centralized billing and administration, usage analytics, team-wide privacy settings, custom chat data retention, SAML/OIDC SSO, mix-and-match seats and invoice/PO billing |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | Large organizations that need enterprise security and scale reviewed with sales rather than self-serveAdds: Adds enterprise security and scale on top of Teams; the pricing page lists it as Custom via contact sales |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Cursor's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Premium at $30/mo is where Cursor becomes the product people describe: cloud agents, Origin, Bugbot and Grok Bot. Plus at $8/mo buys a Grok-only tier, and Super ($100/mo) / Ultra ($200/mo) buy usage multiples rather than features. Teams at $30+/user/month adds SSO, pooled usage and admin. Against GitHub Copilot's low-cost completion plans Cursor is the pricier, agent-heavy choice, and third-party model usage sits outside every price shown.
Has Cursor's pricing changed?
No plan price for Cursor has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Cursor?
Pick Cursor if you are Engineering teams that want agents planning, building and shipping features with human review, Developers who want one subscription covering the agent-first editor, CLI, Slack and iOS, Platform teams using Rollouts, Security Review and Bugbot to police every pull request, Teams building internal agents as code with the Agent SDK, evals and agent-sdk deploy.
Look elsewhere if you are Beginners who want guided learning rather than an autonomous agent acting on their behalf, Air-gapped or offline-only environments where cloud agents and the model router can't reach the network, Teams that only need inline autocomplete at the lowest possible price, Teams unwilling to own triage for parallel agents' pull requests and review debt.
Skip it if Skip Cursor if you only need inline autocomplete at the lowest possible price, or if your team has no appetite for triaging the pull requests fleets of parallel cloud agents will open.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Cursor actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You point a cloud agent at the repo, ask for the auth token rotation change, and watch it open a PR with tests; Bugbot reviews the diff, Security Review flags an exposed credential in a config file, and Rollouts posts a per-environment health verdict on the PR before you merge.
Outcome: The change lands with review artifacts attached instead of a bare diff, and the security flag gets fixed by the agent before merge.
You start a cloud agent and tell it to build an event registration and desk seating tool, then supply the warehouse secret it asks for; it scaffolds the app, creates Postgres, puts it behind Cursor SSO, and returns a link you share with the team.
Outcome: An internal tool goes live behind team sign-in without a ticket to engineering, and admins can see the app and its secrets in the team console.
You keep a Project coordinator working across parallel subagents for days, and when you want a status check you start a voice call on the Agents Window, hear the progress notes, and ask what changed in a specific diff.
Outcome: You stay oriented on long-running work without reading every intermediate message, and can interrupt with a spoken correction.
Use cases
- Build an internal ops tool — event registration, desk seating, pipeline dashboards — and publish it behind Cursor SSO with a link
- Refactor a large codebase across hundreds of files with agent multi-file edits
- Run a months-long migration through a Project whose coordinator delegates to parallel subagents
- Automate PR review, security review and bug detection through Bugbot, Security Review and GitHub
- Watch each deploy with Rollouts and get per-environment health verdicts posted on the pull request
- Trigger agents from a Slack bug-report channel so incoming bugs get delegated automatically
- Define a security reviewer or Linear triager as an Agent SDK template and deploy it from your repo
- Talk through a change out loud with voice chat while the coding agent runs in the background
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Cursor — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
A Developer gets to a first agent edit in an afternoon: install Cursor Desktop or run the CLI install script, point it at a repo and hand it one task. A Platform engineer should budget a week to wire Bugbot, Security Review and Rollouts into the PR flow. An Ops lead building a live app needs minutes to describe the app but should expect a round of back-and-forth on secrets and security checks
Switching to or from Cursor
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From GitHub Copilot: install Cursor Desktop, sign in, open the same repo and start using Agent instead of inline completions — the models picker covers the same third-party providers
- →From VS Code: import settings and extensions through Cursor's VS Code-based onboarding, then move team rules into Cursor Rules and skills
- →From a terminal-only agent CLI: keep the script and swap in the cursor-agent CLI for headless and CI work
- ↗To GitHub Copilot: return to completion-first workflows in VS Code and re-point PR review at Copilot's review features, since Bugbot and Security Review don't follow you
- ↗To a bare model API: export agent definitions from the Agent SDK folder structure (instructions.md, tools/, skills/) and deploy them on your own infrastructure with agent-sdk deploy
Integrations
Resources & guides
- Documentationcursor.com
Cursor Docs — Agent, Rules, MCP, Skills & CLI
Official Cursor documentation. Covers Agent mode, Rules, Skills, MCP servers, CLI, models, and Teams & Enterprise setup. Start building in minutes.
- Resourcecursor.com
What's New in Cursor — Latest Updates & Release Notes
New updates and improvements.
- Resourcecursor.com
Blog
Latest updates and insights from the Cursor team. Learn about AI-powered coding, product updates, and development tips.
- Learncursor.com
Learn Cursor — Official Tutorials
Official Cursor tutorials. Learn AI foundations, coding with agents, and reviewing & testing code.
- Resourceforum.cursor.com
Community Forum
A place to discuss Cursor (bugs, feedback, ideas, etc.)
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Cursor”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Cursor” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Cursor.
Official links
What are the best Cursor alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Cursor we list are GitHub Copilot, Claude Code and Windsurf. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Claude Code | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
| Windsurf | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Cursor
View allGitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding agent that starts work from the issue or pull request already in your repo.
Claude Code
Anthropic's agentic coding assistant that reads your repo, edits across files, runs tests and keeps working until the ticket is closed.
Tools that pair well with Cursor
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Cursor, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding agent that starts work from the issue or pull request already in your repo.
Claude Code
Anthropic's agentic coding assistant that reads your repo, edits across files, runs tests and keeps working until the ticket is closed.
Windsurf
Windsurf is now Devin Desktop: a command center for running local and cloud coding agents from one place.
Cursor vs its closest rival
Cursor's closest head-to-head is with Claude — If you want an agent that plans, builds, tests, and ships features autonomously—especially for engineering teams ready to supervise cloud agents and automate CI fixes—pick Cursor. If you need deep document analysis, enterprise-safe AI, and a CRM/coding assistant that lives in Slack and Chrome, Claude is the better fit. Both have free tiers; choose based on workflow, not just price. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Claude vs Cursor
If you want an agent that plans, builds, tests, and ships features autonomously—especially for engineering teams ready to supervise cloud agents and automate CI fixes—pick Cursor. If you need deep document analysis, enterprise-safe AI, and a CRM/coding assistant that lives in Slack and Chrome, Claude is the better fit. Both have free tiers; choose based on workflow, not just price.
GeneratedCursor vs Locofy
If you live in Figma and need pixel-true UI code fast, Locofy will save you hours of CSS drudgery—just budget for manual tweaks. But if you want an AI teammate that takes a Slack message all the way to a merged PR, Cursor’s agentic depth and context awareness are unmatched. Choose based on your bottleneck: design-to-code handoff vs. end-to-end feature delivery.
GeneratedCursor vs Lovable
Pick Lovable if the deliverable is a deployed product — you want hosting, auth, payments and a live preview wired from a chat prompt without owning the code. Pick Cursor if the deliverable is code in your repo — you want an agent that plans, edits across files, runs tests, and returns reviewable PRs across Desktop, CLI, Slack and iOS. A founder validating an MVP against a deadline leans Lovable; a team that already has engineers and a codebase leans Cursor. They overlap only at the edge where Cursor's 'Build Live Apps' produces a shareable hosted app.
GeneratedCursor vs Greptile
If you're a team that already produces code and needs a rigorous validation layer, Greptile is the safety net — it learns your standards and runs tests to catch what static review misses. If you want to delegate whole features from idea to deployment, Cursor's cloud agents and origin hosting make it the more complete builder. Pick Greptile to protect quality, Cursor to accelerate creation.
GeneratedCursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Augment Code vs Cursor
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Cursor vs Github Copilot
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Cursor vs Jetbrains Ai
If you want an agent that can autonomously plan, build, test, and ship features—even from scratch in a cloud VM—and you collaborate via Slack or GitHub, Cursor is the obvious pick despite the higher team cost. But if you live in IntelliJ or PyCharm and want AI that respects your codebase's patterns without leaving your IDE, JetBrains AI delivers that depth natively, including offline capability—just be ready to pay and skip the free tier.
GeneratedCursor vs Tabnine
If your priority is airtight data sovereignty, custom fine-tuning on proprietary code, and enterprise governance, Tabnine is the safe, compliant choice. But if you want AI to autonomously plan, code, and ship entire features—and you're comfortable with cloud dependency—Cursor is the power play.
GeneratedCursor vs Warp
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Aider vs Cursor
If you live in the terminal and want transparent, cost-effective AI pair programming with Git-native checks, Aider is the pick — you control models and costs via API. If you need an end-to-end agent that plans, builds, and deploys autonomously — and you're willing to pay for the convenience — Cursor is the stronger choice, especially for teams. Choose based on comfort with the command line and the level of autonomy you actually want.
GeneratedCursor vs Windsurf
If you live in the editor and want to command a fleet of agents—local and cloud—without leaving your workflow, Windsurf (Devin Desktop) is your mission control. If you want an AI that takes a feature from zero to shipped—planning, coding, testing, even deploying—and you're okay supervising from Slack or your phone, Cursor is the autonomous powerhouse. Both are freemium, so try the free tiers: Windsurf for orchestration, Cursor for delegation.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Best-of guides
For makers of Cursor
- Get a Verified Listing for Cursor ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used Cursor? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.