Cursor vs Locofy

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Updated
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCursorLocofy
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Target userProfessional developersFrontend developers, designers
Primary functionAI coding agent & environmentDesign-to-code from Figma
Key integrationsGitHub, Slack, CLI, multiple AI modelsFigma, React, Vue, HTML/CSS
Best forBuilding production software with AI assistanceRapid prototyping from Figma designs
Not forJunior developers wanting to learn fundamentalsPixel-perfect production code without tweaks

If your primary need is converting Figma designs to code quickly for prototyping or handoff, Locofy is the focused choice. For developers seeking an AI-powered coding environment that assists with writing, editing, and debugging code across the full stack, Cursor is more versatile. Choose Locofy for design-to-code speed; choose Cursor for end-to-end AI-assisted development.

Cursor
Cursor

AI-native coding agent for autonomous software development

Visit Website
Locofy
Locofy

Convert Figma designs to production-ready frontend code with AI.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$20/mo
$40/user/mo
Custom
$0/mo
$25/mo
Custom
Popularity
3.1k views
3.1k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
Desktop
Web
Categories
💻 Code & Development
💻 Code & Development🎭 Design & UI
Features
Agent mode for autonomous task planning and execution
Composer 2.5 for long-horizon multi-file agentic tasks
Cloud agents with sandboxed remote environments
Cloud environment setup in under 10 minutes with reusable snapshots
CLI for terminal-based automation
Slack integration for agent collaboration
GitHub PR review automation with merging
Auto-review to govern agent autonomy with approval workflows
Bugbot automated debugging (3x faster, 22% cheaper)
Support for multiple AI models: GPT-5.5, Claude Opus, Gemini, xAI
Secure codebase indexing with semantic search
Customize page for plugins, skills, MCPs with marketplace leaderboard
Plugin canvases for visual plugin configuration
/automate skill for creating automations via plain language
Cloud subagents spawned via /in-cloud for parallel work
AI-powered Figma to code conversion
One-click export to React, Vue, Next.js, Gatsby, Angular, React Native, HTML/CSS
Intelligent component detection
Responsive and mobile-friendly layout generation
Live browser editing of generated code
Design system creation for consistent UI components
Automatic asset optimization
Agent Mode for iterative code refinement
GitHub Sync for version control
Figma and Penpot plugin support
CLI for terminal-based conversion
MCP (Model Context Protocol) for AI-native workflows
Import from Figma URL without plugin
Component mapping to match existing codebase tokens
Integrations
VS Code
Slack
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Vercel
Snowflake
Azure DevOps
Terminal/CLI
Figma
Penpot
React
Vue
Next.js
Gatsby
Angular
React Native
HTML/CSS
Supabase
Hygraph

Feature-by-feature

Locofy and Cursor serve different stages of development. Locofy excels at converting Figma designs to production-ready code (React, Vue, HTML/CSS) with features like intelligent component detection, responsive layout generation, and design system creation. It is ideal for frontend developers and designers who want to accelerate the handoff from design to code. Cursor, on the other hand, is an AI-native coding environment that provides context-aware code completions, autonomous multi-file editing via Agent mode (Composer 2.5), and cloud agents for end-to-end builds. It integrates with GitHub for PR review, Slack for collaboration, CLI for command-line assistance, and supports multiple AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, xAI). While Locofy focuses on the design-to-code pipeline, Cursor assists with the entire development lifecycle, including code generation, editing, debugging, and deployment. Both tools have free tiers; Locofy’s free tier allows quick experimentation with Figma-to-code, while Cursor’s free tier offers limited AI features. The choice depends on whether your bottleneck is design implementation or general coding productivity.

Pricing compared

Both Locofy and Cursor offer freemium pricing models, but their paid tiers cater to different needs. Locofy’s free tier enables basic Figma-to-code conversion with limited exports, while its paid plans (typically based on usage or monthly subscription) unlock higher export limits, design system creation, and team collaboration. Cursor’s free tier includes basic code completions and limited agent usage; its Pro plan (around $20/month) adds unlimited completions, Agent mode, and cloud agents. For enterprise teams, Cursor offers customized pricing with additional features like security controls and dedicated support. Locofy’s pricing is more transaction-based (per project or export), whereas Cursor’s is subscription-based with a focus on developer productivity. Neither tool is expensive for individual developers, but Cursor’s Pro plan offers more value for developers who write code daily, while Locofy is cost-effective for teams that frequently convert Figma designs to code.

Who should pick which

  • Frontend developer building from Figma
    Pick: Locofy

    Locofy directly converts Figma designs to React/Vue/HTML code, saving hours of manual conversion.

  • Full-stack developer shipping features fast
    Pick: Cursor

    Cursor’s Agent mode and cloud agents allow autonomous multi-file edits, ideal for rapid feature development.

  • Design team needing quick handoff
    Pick: Locofy

    Locofy’s one-click export and design system creation streamline designer-to-developer handoff.

  • Solo developer managing multiple projects
    Pick: Cursor

    Cursor’s CLI integration and Slack bot help manage coding tasks across projects efficiently.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Locofy without Figma?

No, Locofy requires a Figma design as input; it does not support other design tools.

Does Cursor support non-VS Code editors?

No, Cursor is a fork of VS Code; it is not available as a plugin for other IDEs.

Which tool is better for production code?

Cursor is better for writing and maintaining production code across the stack; Locofy generates frontend code that often requires manual tweaks.

Can Locofy handle Vue.js?

Yes, Locofy supports export to Vue, React, and HTML/CSS.

Does Cursor have a free tier?

Yes, Cursor offers a free tier with limited completions and agent usage; Pro unlocks full features.

Is Locofy suitable for large enterprise apps?

Not ideal; Locofy outputs code that may need significant refactoring for complex state management and scalability.

Does Cursor integrate with GitHub?

Yes, Cursor integrates with GitHub for PR review and inline AI code review.

Which tool is more beginner-friendly?

Locofy is easier for beginners who work with Figma; Cursor assumes familiarity with VS Code and coding.

More Cursor or Locofy comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.