Augment Code vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales (credit-based, can escalate) | Freemium; Pro $20/mo |
| Target User | Enterprise engineering teams | Individual devs to teams |
| Key Feature | Unified Agents Platform (Cosmos) with pre-built agents | Agent mode, Composer 2.5, cloud agents |
| Compliance | SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 42001 | Not mentioned |
| Latest News | Claude Fable 5 added; Cosmos platform launched | SpaceX acquisition; Auto-review; Bugbot improvements |
| Integrations | Slack, GitHub, Jira, CI | VS Code, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Vercel, Snowflake |
Choose Augment Code if you're an enterprise needing governed, multi-agent workflows across the SDLC with compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA). Choose Cursor if you're an individual dev or startup wanting an AI-native IDE with flexible pricing and autonomous coding, especially now backed by SpaceX for long-term stability.
Feature-by-feature
Augment Code offers a unified platform (Cosmos) with specialized agents like Triage Work Dispatcher, PR Author, Deep Code Review, and Tester, plus a Context Engine that reduces token usage by up to 50%. It includes human-in-the-loop escalation, incident management, and security remediation. Cursor provides agent mode, Composer 2.5 for long-horizon tasks, cloud agents with sandboxed builds, Design Mode with voice/visual prompts, and Slack integration. Cursor's multi-model support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, xAI) and VS Code compatibility lower the barrier. Recent updates show Cursor adding /automate skill, Auto-review for governance, and Bugbot (3x faster, 22% cheaper). Augment's latest addition of Claude Fable 5 for deep reasoning tasks underscores its focus on complex enterprise needs. While both offer agentic coding, Augment emphasizes orchestration and compliance; Cursor focuses on developer speed and flexibility.
Pricing compared
Augment Code uses contact-based pricing with credits that can escalate, making it suitable for enterprises with budgets to match. There's no free tier, which eliminates casual users. Cursor offers a freemium model: a limited free tier and Pro at $20/mo. This makes Cursor accessible to individual developers and small teams. Cursor's recent pricing improvements (Bugbot 22% cheaper) indicate cost optimization. For enterprises, Augment's controlled pricing may align with compliance needs, but for most users, Cursor's transparent and lower cost wins.
Who should pick which
- Enterprise engineering leadPick: Augment Code
Needs unified governance, SOC 2/HIPAA compliance, and automated PR review and incident management across the SDLC.
- Solo founderPick: Cursor
Low cost ($20/mo Pro), VS Code familiarity, and powerful agent mode for rapid prototyping without enterprise overhead.
- Security-conscious orgPick: Augment Code
Offers SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 42001 compliance and human-in-the-loop escalation, meeting strict security policies.
- Startup team (5-20 devs)Pick: Cursor
Freemium pricing, multi-model support, and cloud agents for parallel work; SpaceX acquisition suggests long-term viability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool has better code review automation?
Augment Code offers dedicated Deep Code Review, PR Author, and PR Risk Analysis agents designed for automated, governance-controlled reviews. Cursor has GitHub PR review automation but focuses more on agentic coding than formal review processes.
Can I use my own AI model?
Cursor supports multi-model selection including GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, xAI, and its own models. Augment Code uses its own model routing and recently added Claude Fable 5, but does not allow bring-your-own-model.
Is either tool SOC 2 compliant?
Only Augment Code explicitly offers SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA, and ISO 42001 compliance. Cursor does not mention compliance certifications.
How do they handle autonomous agent actions?
Both have human-in-the-loop options. Augment provides 'smart escalation' and policy controls. Cursor recently introduced 'Auto-review' to govern agent autonomy with approval workflows.
What integration with Slack is available?
Both integrate with Slack. Augment uses Slack for notifications and dispatching. Cursor allows agent collaboration in Slack channels and can trigger automations via Slack emoji.
Can I run agents in a sandboxed environment?
Cursor offers cloud agents that run in sandboxed, disposable VMs. Augment provides cloud agent hosted artifacts but does not emphasize sandboxing for security.
What recent major updates should I know about?
Augment Code launched Cosmos platform and added Claude Fable 5. Cursor is being acquired by SpaceX for $60B and introduced Auto-review, Bugbot improvements, and /automate skill.
Which is better for a strict budget?
Cursor's freemium model and $20/mo Pro is far more budget-friendly. Augment Code's contact-based pricing can escalate quickly with credit usage.
More Augment Code or Cursor comparisons
Choose Cursor if you're a developer who wants an AI agent to autonomously build features, test, and deploy—it's a full IDE replacement. Choose Claude if you need a versatile assistant for analyzing lo
If your primary need is converting Figma designs to code quickly for prototyping or handoff, Locofy is the focused choice. For developers seeking an AI-powered coding environment that assists with wri
Lovable is the clear winner for non-developers who need to rapidly prototype and deploy MVPs via chat, while Cursor is the superior choice for developers seeking an AI-powered coding assistant that bo
If your team needs a centralized command center for orchestrating multiple coding agents locally and in the cloud, Codeium's Devin Desktop is the clear choice with its unlimited SWE-1.6 model and seam
Chose Greptile if your primary need is automated, context-aware code review that catches multi-file bugs and integrates with your existing IDE. Pick Cursor if you want a full AI-native coding environm
If you work across massive multi-repo codebases and need deep context-aware assistance with robust enterprise controls, Sourcegraph Cody is the clear choice. If you want an AI-native IDE that autonomo
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.