Augment Code vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Enterprise teams with large codebases needing deep context indexing and agentic workflows across multiple IDEs. | Professional developers and startups wanting an AI-first editor with fast autocomplete and autonomous task execution. |
| Pricing | Free plan with basic autocomplete and limited chat; Pro at $30/mo for full indexing and all models; Enterprise custom. | Free plan with 2000 completions and 50 premium requests; Pro at $20/mo (unlimited completions, 500 premium requests); Business at $40/user/mo. |
| Setup complexity | Moderate – requires installing extension(s) and indexing the full codebase; configuration for agents and Cosmos. | Low – built as a VS Code fork, familiar environment; install and start coding immediately. |
| Strongest differentiator | Context Engine indexes entire repository (code, dependencies, docs, history) for deep codebase understanding; Cosmos orchestrates human-AI agents at org level. | Composer 2 enables autonomous multi-file agentic development with reasoning and planning, all within a VS Code-like editor. |
Augment Code vs Cursor: For large enterprise codebases requiring deep context indexing and multi-IDE support, Augment Code wins with its Context Engine and Cosmos org-level agent coordination. For individual developers and small teams prioritizing speed and ease of use in a VS Code environment, Cursor is the better choice due to its lower price ($20/mo Pro vs $30/mo) and instant setup as a fork. Your decision hinges on team scale: enterprises needing custom compliance and SOC 2 should lean Augment; startups and pros wanting autonomous agents for feature building should pick Cursor.
Feature-by-feature
Core Capabilities: Augment Code vs Cursor
Augment Code focuses on deep codebase understanding through its Context Engine, which indexes the entire repository including dependencies, architecture, documentation, and revision history. This allows it to generate context-aware suggestions that respect existing patterns. Cursor, as a VS Code fork, provides AI-powered tab completion, inline editing, and codebase-aware chat. Both support multi-file edits, but Cursor’s Composer 2 can autonomously build, test, and demo features with reasoning and planning. Augment’s agentic workspace includes Intent for task planning before implementation, while Cursor offers Cloud Agents for autonomous execution. Augment Code wins for enterprise teams that need rigorous codebase context; Cursor wins for developers who want fast, autonomous feature creation.
AI/Model Approach
Augment Code supports multiple models including Gemini 3.1 Pro, giving teams flexibility to choose the best model for their tasks. Cursor also offers custom model selection, including its own optimized models. Both tools allow switching models, but Augment’s enterprise plan may include private deployment options (e.g., self-hosted models). Cursor’s models are optimized for speed and accuracy in its fork environment. Cursor ties with Augment Code on model flexibility, but Augment’s support for Gemini 3.1 Pro and custom enterprise models gives it an edge for organizations requiring specific model governance.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Augment Code integrates with VS Code, JetBrains, Git, GitHub, Slack, CLI, and MCP (Model Context Protocol). This broad IDE support is critical for teams using both JetBrains and VS Code. Cursor integrates with GitHub, GitLab, VS Code extensions, and demos for Snowflake, Vercel, and shadcn. Cursor’s deep integration with the VS Code extension ecosystem allows reuse of existing tools. Augment Code wins for multi-IDE environments; Cursor wins for teams fully within the VS Code ecosystem that want seamless extension compatibility.
Performance & Scale
Augment Code’s Context Engine indexes entire repositories, including large monorepos, and maintains context across sessions. Its Memory management with approval workflow helps teams review AI actions. Cursor is known for speed, with low-latency completions and fast agentic responses. For very large codebases, Augment’s indexing can handle dependencies and history, while Cursor relies on its understanding of the workspace. Augment Code wins for large-scale codebases and enterprise requirements; Cursor wins for quick, responsive interactions on moderately sized projects.
Developer Experience & Workflow
Augment Code offers CLI integration, Slack integration, and PR summaries with inline code review comments. Its Cosmos system coordinates human and AI agents at the organization level, ideal for teams adopting AI workflows. Cursor provides terminal command generation, Bugbot for AI code reviews on PRs, and an admin dashboard for monitoring usage (Business plan). Cursor’s VS Code fork means a familiar UI with minimal learning curve. Cursor wins on ease of adoption for individual developers; Augment Code wins for teams needing orchestrated agent workflows and org-wide governance.
Pricing compared
Augment Code pricing (2026)
Augment Code offers a free plan with basic autocomplete and limited chat. The Pro plan is $30/month, which includes full codebase indexing and access to all models. Enterprise pricing is custom, with features like SSO and private deployment. As of 2026, there is no public tier between Pro and Enterprise for teams that need higher usage without custom enterprise features. Overage fees or usage limits beyond indexed repositories are not publicly documented.
Cursor pricing (2026)
Cursor’s free plan includes 2000 completions and 50 premium requests per month. The Pro plan costs $20/month (unlimited completions, 500 premium requests). The Business plan is $40/user/month and includes an admin dashboard, SSO, and usage analytics. Enterprise plan pricing is custom with SAML/OIDC SSO and privacy mode. Note that premium requests are used for agentic features like Composer, which may be a limiting factor for heavy users. Cursor’s pricing is transparent and scales predictably.
Value-per-dollar: Augment Code vs Cursor
For solo developers or small teams on a budget, Cursor’s Pro at $20/month offers more value with unlimited completions and 500 premium requests, compared to Augment’s Pro at $30/month. For larger teams, Cursor’s Business plan at $40/user/month is competitive, but Augment’s Enterprise plan may be more cost-effective if private deployment and SOC 2 compliance are required. Cursor wins for cost-conscious professionals; Augment Code wins for enterprises needing custom security and deployment options.
Who should pick which
- Enterprise engineering team (50+ devs) with a large monorepoPick: Augment Code
Augment Code's Context Engine indexes the entire repository, including dependencies and history, and Cosmos enables org-level agent coordination. Enterprise plan offers SSO and private deployment.
- Solo startup founder building an MVP quicklyPick: Cursor
Cursor's Composer 2 autonomously builds features, and the Pro plan at $20/mo is budget-friendly. Low setup as a VS Code fork allows immediate productivity.
- Mid-size team using both VS Code and JetBrains IDEsPick: Augment Code
Augment Code supports VS Code and JetBrains natively, while Cursor is only a VS Code fork. This avoids forcing a switch for JetBrains users.
- Professional developer who needs fast autocomplete and occasional AI agentsPick: Cursor
Cursor's tab completion is fast and accurate, and its Pro plan includes 500 premium requests per month for Composer, sufficient for most solo work.
- Regulated industry team requiring on-premises deployment and SOC 2Pick: Augment Code
Augment Code's Enterprise plan offers private deployment and SOC 2 (as per vendor claims). Cursor does not offer on-premises hosting.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Augment Code offer a free tier?
Yes, Augment Code has a free plan with basic autocomplete and limited chat. For full codebase indexing and all models, you need the $30/mo Pro plan.
Does Cursor have a free version?
Yes, Cursor offers a free plan including 2000 completions and 50 premium requests per month. Upgrading to Pro ($20/mo) gives unlimited completions and 500 premium requests.
Can I use Augment Code with JetBrains IDEs?
Yes, Augment Code integrates with JetBrains IDEs as well as VS Code, CLI, and Slack. Cursor is a VS Code fork and does not support JetBrains natively.
Which tool is better for large codebases?
Augment Code is better for large codebases because its Context Engine indexes the entire repository including dependencies, architecture, and history, maintaining deep context across sessions.
Can Cursor be used for enterprise with SSO?
Yes, Cursor Business plan at $40/user/mo includes SSO and admin dashboard. Enterprise plan adds SAML/OIDC SSO and privacy mode, but does not include on-premises hosting.
What is Cosmos in Augment Code?
Cosmos is an operating system for coordinating human and AI agents at the organizational level, enabling complex workflows and approval processes.
Is Cursor a fork of VS Code?
Yes, Cursor is a fork of VS Code, meaning the UI and most extensions are compatible. You can use existing VS Code extensions within Cursor.
Can I switch from Cursor to Augment Code easily?
Switching from Cursor to Augment Code requires installing Augment extensions in your IDE (VS Code, JetBrains) and setting up the Context Engine indexing. If you rely on VS Code extensions, Augment supports VS Code, but you may need to adjust to its agentic workflow (Intent, Cosmos).
Which tool is better for autonomous feature development?
Cursor's Composer 2 is specifically designed for autonomous multi-file feature building with reasoning and planning, making it superior for quickly creating features from scratch.
Do these tools support PR review comments?
Yes, both support PR review. Augment Code provides PR summaries and inline code review comments. Cursor offers Bugbot for AI code reviews on pull requests.
Last reviewed: May 12, 2026