Cursor vs Windsurf Editor
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Cursor | Windsurf Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $0/month (Hobby) / $20/month (Pro) / $40/user/month (Teams) | $0/month (Free) / $20/month (Pro) / Custom (Teams) |
| Target User | Developers and teams building complex features with autonomous agents | Engineering teams coordinating multiple agents on large codebases |
| Core Platform | AI-native IDE built on VS Code (fork) | Independent IDE (formerly Windsurf) with Agent Command Center |
| Agent Orchestration | Agent mode + Composer 2.5; cloud agents in sandboxed VMs | Multi-agent sessions via Sessions Board; local + cloud agents via Devin |
| Model Support | GPT-5.5, Claude Opus, Gemini, xAI, others | SWE-1.6, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, more via ACP |
| Latest News (June 2026) | SpaceX acquires Cursor for $60B; new /automate skill; Auto-review governance | Rebranded to Devin Desktop; v3.2.16 plugin system; .devinignore |
If you manage a team juggling multiple coding agents on large monorepos, pickup Windsurf Editor (now Devin Desktop) for its multi-agent orchestration, local+cloud flexibility, and deep context retrieval. For individual developers wanting an AI-first IDE that replaces VS Code with strong autonomous features and a massive ecosystem, go with Cursor—its recent $60B acquisition by SpaceX signals stability, but its cloud-only assumption may not suit air-gapped teams.
Feature-by-feature
Windsurf Editor (Devin Desktop) shines in multi-agent orchestration: its Sessions Board lets you track multiple agents simultaneously, and the Agent Client Protocol (ACP) supports diverse models like SWE-1.6, Claude Opus 4.7, and GPT-5.5. Fast Context delivers millisecond codebase retrieval, and Diff Review enables safe merging. The platform also offers local agents (Devin Local) with cloud handoff (Devin Cloud) if you close your laptop. Recent v3.2.16 introduces a plugin system for Devin Local and subagent MCP tool access. Cursor focuses on autonomous end-to-end task execution via Agent mode and Composer 2.5, which handles long-horizon multi-file work. Cloud agents run in sandboxed remote environments, and the June 2026 update added /automate skill for natural-language workflow creation and Auto-review to govern agent autonomy. Cursor’s integration with VS Code extensions (though it's a fork) appeals to existing VS Code users. Both support multiple models, but Windsurf’s ACP is explicitly designed for model diversity. Windsurf integrates with Slack, Teams, Linear, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket; Cursor integrates with Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and the new Cursor SDK for custom tools. Windsurf’s “not for” includes solo developers; Cursor’s “not for” includes beginners and air-gapped environments.
Pricing compared
Windsurf Editor offers a Free tier (basic IDE plus limited agent usage), a Pro tier at $20/month (full agent orchestration, cloud agents, Fast Context), and custom Teams pricing. Cursor has a Hobby tier (free, limited usage), Pro at $20/month, and Teams at $40/user/month with admin controls, audit logs, and prioritized support. Windsurf’s free tier is more generous for multi-agent experimentation, while Cursor’s free Hobby tier is more restrictive. For teams, Cursor’s per-user pricing is standard, but Windsurf’s custom Teams may be negotiable for larger deployments. Neither has a discount for annual billing on public tiers. Consider total cost: Windsurf’s Teams pricing is opaque, so evaluate if custom fit justifies slower procurement.
Who should pick which
- Engineering team lead on a large monorepoPick: Windsurf Editor
Sessions Board for multi-agent tracking, Fast Context for millisecond codebase retrieval, and local+cloud agent flexibility fit large-scale coordination.
- Full-stack developer building complex features soloPick: Cursor
Composer 2.5 handles long-horizon multi-file tasks autonomously, and the VS Code-like interface offers low switching cost.
- Solo founder on a tight budgetPick: Cursor
Free Hobby tier covers basic agent usage; Pro at $20/mo is reasonable. Windsurf's free tier is comparable but less focused on autonomous task completion.
- Enterprise needing air-gapped compliancePick: Windsurf Editor
Local agents run on your machine without internet; Cursor’s cloud agents require connectivity.
- Team wanting to automate PR review and mergesPick: Cursor
GitHub PR review automation with merging and Auto-review governance are built-in; Windsurf relies on Diff Review and manual approval.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is better for multi-model flexibility?
Windsurf Editor via Agent Client Protocol (ACP) natively supports SWE-1.6, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and more, while Cursor supports GPT-5.5, Claude Opus, Gemini, xAI—but not as many specialized models.
Can I use either tool offline?
Windsurf Editor supports local agents (Devin Local) that run without internet; Cursor’s cloud agents require connectivity. Cursor’s basic IDE may work offline but agent features need internet.
Which has better VS Code compatibility?
Cursor is a VS Code fork with deep compatibility; Windsurf Editor is a standalone IDE (formerly Windsurf) now rebranded as Devin Desktop, so VS Code extensions may not work directly.
How do their free tiers compare?
Windsurf Free offers basic IDE + limited agent usage; Cursor Hobby offers limited agent usage. Both are sufficient for light experimentation.
Which tool is best for automated debugging?
Cursor has Bugbot (3x faster, 22% cheaper); Windsurf relies on general agent capabilities and doesn’t offer a dedicated debugging agent.
What does the latest Windsurf rebranding mean?
As of June 2026, Windsurf Editor is now called Devin Desktop. The product remains the same; the name aligns with the Devin agent ecosystem.
Is Cursor stable after the SpaceX acquisition?
The $60B acquisition (announced June 2026) indicates strong financial backing, but product changes may follow—monitor for future shifts in pricing or features.
Which tool is better for team collaboration?
Windsurf Editor offers Sessions Board for multi-agent tracking and integration with Slack, Teams, Linear, Jira; Cursor has Slack integration and GitHub reviews but less multi-agent visibility.
More Cursor or Windsurf Editor comparisons
Choose Cursor if you're a developer who wants an AI agent to autonomously build features, test, and deploy—it's a full IDE replacement. Choose Claude if you need a versatile assistant for analyzing lo
If your primary need is converting Figma designs to code quickly for prototyping or handoff, Locofy is the focused choice. For developers seeking an AI-powered coding environment that assists with wri
Lovable is the clear winner for non-developers who need to rapidly prototype and deploy MVPs via chat, while Cursor is the superior choice for developers seeking an AI-powered coding assistant that bo
If your team needs a centralized command center for orchestrating multiple coding agents locally and in the cloud, Codeium's Devin Desktop is the clear choice with its unlimited SWE-1.6 model and seam
Chose Greptile if your primary need is automated, context-aware code review that catches multi-file bugs and integrates with your existing IDE. Pick Cursor if you want a full AI-native coding environm
If you work across massive multi-repo codebases and need deep context-aware assistance with robust enterprise controls, Sourcegraph Cody is the clear choice. If you want an AI-native IDE that autonomo
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.