Dexter Jp vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionDexter JpScreenplayIQ
PricingFree tier (100 API requests/mo + MCP server); Paid tiers not specifiedFree tier (1 analysis/mo); Pro $19/mo; Studio $49/mo
Target UsersJapanese equity investors, quant analysts, AI developersScreenwriters, producers, studio executives
Core FunctionFinancial research & data for Japanese listed companiesAI screenplay analysis & box office prediction
Key Features147 financial indicators, health score, AI integrated analysis, REST API (69+ endpoints), MCP server, earnings call Q&AStructural feedback, beat sheets, heatmaps, genre classification, PitchTrailer integration
Geographic FocusJapan (4,631 listed companies)English feature films only
IntegrationsClaude Desktop, Claude Code, ChatGPT, OpenAI Codex CLI, Cursor, J-Quants, Claude Fable 5, npx mcp-remotePitchTrailer

ScreenplayIQ and Dexter Jp serve entirely different markets: screenwriting vs. Japanese financial research. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a filmmaker wanting data-driven script feedback and box office predictions. Choose Dexter Jp if you're an investor or developer needing free, structured financial data on Japanese companies with API/agent integration. No direct competition.

Try Dexter JpTry ScreenplayIQ
Dexter Jp
Dexter Jp

AI-native Japanese financial data platform: 4,653 companies, 152 indicators, free API & MCP

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Paid
Paid
Plans
¥0/mo
¥1,480/mo (introductory, first 1,000 users; regular ¥2,480)
¥4,980/mo (or ¥47,800/year, effectively ¥3,983/mo)
¥29,800/mo
Custom
¥0/mo (free for researchers)
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
7 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
WebAPIPlugin
WebAPI
Categories
📈 Investing & Market Research📊 Data & Analytics
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Financial data for 4,653 Japanese listed companies (3,818 active, 835 delisted)
152 standardized financial indicators normalized from JP GAAP, IFRS, US GAAP
Rule-based Financial Health Score (0-100) with fully disclosed logic
AI-generated integrated analysis (quantitative + qualitative) via Claude
75-endpoint REST API returning JSON
MCP server for AI agent integration (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Copilot Studio)
Web dashboard with rankings, screeners, peer comparison, and stock calendar
Daily data updates at 8:00 JST from EDINET filings
Traceability to original EDINET documents via docID (one-click PDF)
Earnings call Q&A dataset for 806 companies, 12,139 sections, 29 theme tags
IR theme screeners (e.g., PBR response, DX/AI strategy)
CSV/JSON export for offline analysis
Notification rules via Email and Slack
J-Quants integration for combined price and fundamental analysis
FUDOSAN DB integration for real estate data cross-referencing
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration for pitch decks
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
Claude Desktop
Claude Code
ChatGPT
Copilot Studio
J-Quants
OpenAI Codex CLI
Cursor
PitchTrailer

What real users say: Dexter Jp vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Dexter Jp

18 mentions across 2 sources · 45% positive — mixed

GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Covers all 4,631 Japanese listed companies including 797 delisted ones.
  • • Deterministic XBRL parsing with no LLM hallucination on financial numbers.
  • • Free tier offers 100 API/MCP requests per day with no credit card.
  • • MCP server enables direct integration with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, ChatGPT.

What frustrates them

  • • TUI has a bug causing duplicate prompt submissions after interrupts.
  • • Large JSON responses overwhelm low-cost LLMs like Ollama.
  • • Sparse community feedback makes support and reliability uncertain.
  • • Web dashboard less intuitive for non-technical users.

Researched Jul 5, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

7 mentions across 1 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • • Pay-per-analysis avoids subscription lock-in.
  • • Offers box office prediction, a unique feature.
  • • Tailored feedback based on script length and TV options.
  • • Includes character journey charts and beat sheets.

What frustrates them

  • • Reported to nearly ruin a user's script feedback.
  • • Expensive per analysis, up to $198.
  • • No line-by-line editing, despite expectations.
  • • Limited to English scripts only.

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Screenwriter seeking script feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ provides AI-driven structural analysis, beat sheets, and pacing heatmaps specifically designed for feature film scripts, plus box office prediction.

  • Japanese equity investor
    Pick: Dexter Jp

    Dexter Jp offers free access to 147 financial indicators, health scores, and AI analysis for all 4,631 Japanese listed companies, with daily updates and full traceability.

  • AI developer building financial agents
    Pick: Dexter Jp

    Dexter Jp's REST API (69+ endpoints) and MCP server enable seamless integration with AI agents like Claude and ChatGPT for Japanese financial data.

  • Producer evaluating script marketability
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ's box office prediction and comparative market data help producers assess potential financial returns of scripts.

  • Quant analyst needing fundamental data
    Pick: Dexter Jp

    Dexter Jp provides standardized financial indicators across JP GAAP, IFRS, and US GAAP, with 6 years of history and a rule-based health score.

Frequently Asked Questions

Dexter Jp vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

ScreenplayIQ and Dexter Jp serve entirely different markets: screenwriting vs. Japanese financial research. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a filmmaker wanting data-driven script feedback and box office predictions. Choose Dexter Jp if you're an investor or developer needing free, structured financial data on Japanese companies with API/agent integration. No direct competition.

Can ScreenplayIQ analyze TV scripts or short films?

No. ScreenplayIQ only supports English feature films, not TV or shorts.

Does Dexter Jp cover companies outside Japan?

No. It covers only Japanese listed companies (4,631 total, including delisted).

Does ScreenplayIQ offer a free trial?

Yes, there is a Free tier with 1 analysis per month.

Is Dexter Jp's API completely free?

The free tier includes 100 API requests per month. Higher usage may require a paid plan (details not specified).

Can I use Dexter Jp with Claude Desktop?

Yes, Dexter Jp offers an MCP server compatible with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and other AI tools.

Does ScreenplayIQ integrate with any scriptwriting software?

It integrates with PitchTrailer for pitch deck generation, but no direct integration with Final Draft or other screenwriting tools is mentioned.

What financial standards does Dexter Jp support?

It normalizes across JP GAAP, IFRS, and US GAAP into 147 standardized fields.

Can ScreenplayIQ predict box office for indie films?

It uses comparative market data against top-grossing films, so predictions may be less reliable for low-budget or niche films.

More Dexter Jp or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Tableau vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

ScreenplayIQ and Tableau serve entirely different domains: one is a niche AI tool for screenplay analysis with box office prediction, while the other is a general-purpose data visualization platform.

Amplitude vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

ScreenplayIQ and Amplitude serve entirely different domains. If you need data-driven feedback on a screenplay's commercial potential, ScreenplayIQ's AI analysis and box office predictions are uniquely

Power BI vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

If you're a business analyst or enterprise user in a Microsoft shop, Power BI's freemium desktop plus affordable Pro licensing is a no-brainer for interactive dashboards. For screenwriters and produce

Looker vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a film industry professional needing predictive financial analytics on scripts. Choose Looker if you're an enterprise on Google Cloud requiring a governed, AI-driven BI p

Datadog vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Datadog and ScreenplayIQ serve entirely different markets. Datadog is a comprehensive observability platform for tech teams managing complex cloud infrastructures, while ScreenplayIQ is a niche AI too

Neon vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Neon and ScreenplayIQ serve entirely different markets. Neon is a serverless database platform for developers building scalable apps, while ScreenplayIQ is a niche AI tool for film industry profession

Explore each tool further

Dexter Jp
View Dexter Jp reviewDexter Jp alternatives
ScreenplayIQ
View ScreenplayIQ reviewScreenplayIQ alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Investing & Market Research toolsBest AI Fiction & Screenwriting toolsBest AI Data & Analytics tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 5, 2026