Fenic vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionFenicScreenplayIQ
PricingFree (open-source framework)Free tier (1 analysis/mo), Pro $19/mo, Studio $49/mo
Target userData scientists, AI engineers, agent developersScreenwriters, producers, studio execs
Core capabilitySemantic DataFrames for unstructured data using LLMsAI screenplay analysis with box office prediction
IntegrationMultiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenRouter)PitchTrailer
Key limitationPython-only, no no-code GUIFeature films only, English, max 150 pages
Latest news highlightsv0.7.0 adds Gemini 3 Flash with thinking levels; v0.6.0 adds LLM caching, 20+ new opsNone

ScreenplayIQ and Fenic target completely different problems: one is a specialized screenplay analyzer for the film industry, the other a Python framework for any unstructured data processing. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you need script-level marketability insights and box office predictions; choose Fenic if you want to build custom LLM data pipelines for semantic extraction and transformation. They are not substitutes.

Fenic
Fenic

Open-source Python framework turning messy text into typed, queryable Semantic DataFrames

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Paid
Plans
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
4 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
CLI
WebAPI
Categories
📊 Data & Analytics📦 LLM App Frameworks & SDKs
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Semantic DataFrames for unstructured text
LLM-powered extraction, classification, embedding
Join datasets by semantic similarity
Lineage tracking and explainability per operation
Cost tracking per LLM call
Persistent LLM response caching (0.6.0)
Cached execution plans to avoid redo
Support for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenRouter
Claude 4.5, GPT-5.1, Gemini 3 Pro support (0.6.0)
Gemini 3 Flash with four thinking levels (0.7.0)
Optional usage summary suppression (0.7.0)
Over 20 DataFrame operations (0.6.0)
PDF parsing with multiple backends (OpenAI, OpenRouter)
Promote data to tables or MCP tools
Rust expression plugins for Polars text ops (chunking, prompt templating)
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
OpenRouter
Polars
PitchTrailer

Who should pick which

  • Screenwriter seeking market validation
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ directly predicts box office performance and provides structural feedback tailored to feature films.

  • Producer evaluating multiple scripts
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    The comparative market data and collaborative workspace (Studio) help compare scripts efficiently.

  • Data scientist processing unstructured text
    Pick: Fenic

    Fenic's Semantic DataFrames with LLM-powered extraction and caching are built for this task.

  • AI engineer building agent data pipelines
    Pick: Fenic

    Fenic's lineage tracking, MCP tool export, and support for multiple LLMs fit agent development needs.

  • Hobbyist writer wanting occasional feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Free tier offers 1 analysis per month, enough for casual use without cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

Fenic vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

ScreenplayIQ and Fenic target completely different problems: one is a specialized screenplay analyzer for the film industry, the other a Python framework for any unstructured data processing. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you need script-level marketability insights and box office predictions; choose Fenic if you want to build custom LLM data pipelines for semantic extraction and transformation. They are not substitutes.

Can Fenic analyze screenplays like ScreenplayIQ?

No. Fenic is a generic data processing framework; it has no screenplay-specific analysis or box office prediction.

Does ScreenplayIQ support TV scripts or short films?

No, only feature films (max 150 pages).

Can I use Fenic without coding?

No. Fenic is a Python library; you need to write Python code to use it.

Does ScreenplayIQ offer a free trial?

Yes, there is a Free tier with 1 analysis per month.

Which tool handles PDFs better?

Fenic has dedicated PDF parsing backends and supports extracting data from multiple PDFs. ScreenplayIQ only accepts script uploads (likely PDF) but focuses on structural analysis.

Do both tools integrate with other platforms?

ScreenplayIQ integrates with PitchTrailer only. Fenic integrates with multiple LLM providers and can export to MCP tools.

Can ScreenplayIQ be used for collaborative script coverage?

Yes, the Studio tier supports up to 5 users collaborating. Fenic has no collaboration features.

Which tool is more cost-effective for heavy use?

Fenic is free but requires LLM API costs. ScreenplayIQ's Pro tier at $19/mo includes unlimited analyses, which may be cheaper if LLM costs exceed $19 monthly.

More Fenic or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026