Figma vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Figma | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Use | UI/UX design & prototyping | 3D scanning & photogrammetry |
| Pricing Model | Freemium (Professional $12/editor/mo, Organization $45/editor/mo) | Freemium (Pro $79.99/yr, Business custom) |
| Key Feature | Real-time collaboration, Dev Mode, FigJam | Spatial Object, Floorplan, Aerial scanning |
| Platform | Browser, Desktop (macOS/Windows) | iOS, Android, Web, Vision Pro |
| Integration Focus | Developer handoff (code), plugins | Autodesk, Unity, Unreal, Blender |
| Best For | UI/UX design teams, product managers | AEC, forensics, product design |
Polycam and Figma serve completely different domains: Polycam for capturing real-world 3D data and Figma for designing digital interfaces. If you need high-accuracy 3D scanning, floor plans, or drone mapping, Polycam is the choice. For collaborative UI/UX design, prototyping, and design-system management, Figma leads. They are complementary, not competitive; many professionals may use both.

Collaborative interface design tool for teams to design, prototype, and build together.
Visit Website
AI-powered 3D scanning for professionals: objects, interiors, floor plans & drone aerial mapping.
Visit WebsiteFeature-by-feature
Polycam is a cross-platform AI 3D scanning tool with four capture modes: Spatial Object for object scanning, Floorplan for generating 2D floor plans from 3D captures, LiDAR room scanning, and Aerial/drone photogrammetry. It includes instant measurements, digital twin creation, and collaboration tools. Export formats include FBX, GLTF, OBJ, AutoCAD, and integration with Blender, Unity, Unreal Engine. In contrast, Figma is a cloud-based collaborative interface design tool focused on UI/UX. Key features include real-time multiplayer editing, Dev Mode for design-to-code handoff, FigJam digital whiteboarding, AI-powered design tools (Figma Make), Figma Sites for responsive websites, component libraries, and variables. Figma has a vast plugin ecosystem but limited 3D capabilities. While Polycam excels at capturing and exporting spatial data for 3D workflows, Figma dominates in digital product design and developer collaboration. The tools address different stages of the design lifecycle: Polycam for real-world capture, Figma for screen-based prototyping.
Pricing compared
Polycam offers a freemium model: free tier with limited captures, Pro at $79.99/year (with additional features like HD exports and LiDAR), and a Business plan with custom pricing (including a 7-day free trial). Figma also uses freemium: free tier for up to 3 files and a limited number of editors, Professional at $12 per editor per month (unlimited files, version history, FigJam), and Organization at $45 per editor per month (with advanced admin controls, shared plugins, and custom permissions). Polycam's pricing is per-user annually, while Figma is per editor per month. For heavy 3D scanning, Polycam's Pro is cost-effective. For design teams, Figma's Professional plan scales with team size. Both have free trials, but Polycam's free tier is more limited. Consider the value: Polycam replaces expensive 3D scanning hardware; Figma replaces multiple design tools.
Who should pick which
- AEC professional needing site documentationPick: Polycam
Polycam provides floor plan generation, LiDAR scanning, and drone mapping, which are essential for rapid site capture and measurement.
- UI/UX designer collaborating with developersPick: Figma
Figma's real-time collaboration, Dev Mode, and design systems streamline the handoff process and ensure design consistency.
- Product designer creating 3D prototypesPick: Polycam
Polycam can scan physical prototypes to create digital twins for remote collaboration and integration with CAD tools.
- Product manager running design sprintsPick: Figma
FigJam and Figma's prototyping capabilities allow PMs to participate in whiteboarding and interactive designs.
- Forensics team capturing crime scenesPick: Polycam
Polycam's fast, accurate 3D scene capture and measurement tools are ideal for documentation and evidence analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Figma generate 3D models?
No, Figma is for 2D UI/UX design and prototyping. It does not support 3D scanning or modeling.
Can Polycam be used for UI design?
No, Polycam is for 3D scanning and photogrammetry, not interface design.
Which tool integrates with AutoCAD?
Polycam offers export to AutoCAD-compatible formats (DXF, DWG). Figma can integrate via plugins but not natively for CAD data.
Do both tools support collaboration?
Yes, but differently: Polycam allows sharing 3D models and walkthroughs; Figma enables real-time multiplayer editing and commenting on designs.
Which is better for real estate agents?
Polycam, as it can create 3D tours and floor plans from scans, whereas Figma is not suited for property visualization.
How do pricing plans compare for a team of 5?
Polycam Business custom pricing likely ~$50/user/month? Figma Professional would be $60/month total (5 editors × $12). Exact Polycam Business pricing is not public.
Is there a free trial for Polycam?
Yes, a 7-day free Business trial is available. Figma offers a free tier with limited features.
Which has better developer handoff?
Figma, with Dev Mode that provides specs, code snippets, and asset export. Polycam exports 3D files for developer use but lacks design-specific handoff.
More Figma or Polycam comparisons
If you need to capture and measure the physical world in 3D, Polycam is the clear choice. If you need to build custom business apps and automate workflows without code, Airtable wins. These tools are
Polycam and Miro serve entirely different purposes. If your work involves capturing real-world 3D models, floor plans, or drone scans, Polycam is the clear choice. If you need a collaborative workspac
These tools serve entirely different domains. Polycam is best for professionals needing quick, accurate 3D scanning and floor plans from real-world environments, while Linear excels for engineering te
Polycam and Notion serve entirely different needs. Choose Polycam if you need to create 3D models and floor plans from real-world scans — it's a specialized tool for physical space capture. Choose Not
LM Studio and Polycam serve completely different domains: local LLM inference vs. 3D scanning. Choose LM Studio if you need private, offline AI language processing powered by local models on Mac or Li
Nectar Energy and Figma serve completely different domains, so the choice depends entirely on your industry and role. If you're in renewable energy operations or trading, Nectar's AI-driven forecastin