Filevine vs Harvey

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-29
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionFilevineHarvey
Pricingfreemium · from LOIS Free Trial $0contact
Best forHigh-volume personal injury firms, Mass torts teamsLarge law firms running high-volume document review, due diligence, and discovery, In-house legal teams managing contract portfolios and outside counsel relationships
Standout featuresFirm-wide AI agents running across every matter via LOIS Console · Structured Legal Graph built on 40M+ matters · Read/Write AI that sets tasks, moves deadlines, and generates documentsAgentic workflows that execute complex legal tasks end-to-end · Agents automatically route tasks to the right specialized agent · Vault: store, organize, and bulk-analyze thousands of legal documents
Viability score79/10072/100
APIYesYes

Filevine is the stronger pick for high-volume personal injury firms; Harvey fits better for large law firms running high-volume document review, due diligence, and discovery.

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-09-29.

Filevine
Filevine

Filevine's LOIS is an AI-native legal operating system whose firm-wide agents read your matters and execute legal work, not just chat.

Visit Website
Harvey
Harvey

Harvey runs agentic AI for legal work: agents that execute complex tasks end-to-end for law firms and in-house teams.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Contact Sales
Plans
$0
Custom
Custom
—
Popularity
4.9k views
6.0k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
Web
WebMobile
Categories
⚖️ Contracts, E-Signature & Legal
⚖️ Contracts, E-Signature & Legal
Features
Firm-wide AI agents running across every matter via LOIS Console
Structured Legal Graph built on 40M+ matters
Read/Write AI that sets tasks, moves deadlines, and generates documents
Ask LOIS natural-language questions with traceable, source-linked answers
AI Drafting with context-driven, fact-level accuracy and human-verified output
LOIS for Word: in-document drafting and standards-enforced redlining
Depo Copilot: live deposition transcription with goal-based guidance
Depo Summaries: AI deposition summaries surfacing admissions
Depo Library: searchable AI-transcribed testimony with clip-level video access
MedChron: automated medical timelines from unstructured records
LOIS Legal Research grounding arguments in traceable case law
Matter management with task tracking, contacts, and deadlines
Document management with advanced search and secure sharing
Leads and client intake module
Billing, time-keeping, and payment processing
Agentic workflows that execute complex legal tasks end-to-end
Agents automatically route tasks to the right specialized agent
Vault: store, organize, and bulk-analyze thousands of legal documents
Knowledge: research legal, regulatory, and tax questions across domains
Contract Intelligence: surface portfolio-wide negotiation insights
Spaces: shared workspaces for firms, clients, and co-counsel
Ethical walls and governance controls for sensitive matters
Command Center: usage analytics and benchmarking across teams and offices
Memory: preferences carried across Harvey for consistent responses
Harvey Mobile for access away from the desk
Harvey II: the vendor's current, more capable generation of agents
Harvey Academy: on-demand training and step-by-step guided workflows
ROI calculators for law firms and in-house teams
Regional availability in the US, EU, and AU
Enterprise-grade security and compliance controls
Integrations
Microsoft Word
Google Calendar
Google Drive
Microsoft Office

What real users say: Filevine vs Harvey

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Filevine

45 mentions across 4 sources · 29% positive — critical (averaged across 4 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Bluesky, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Firm-wide AI agents that read, write, and act on cases.
  • • Depo Copilot provides real-time deposition analysis.
  • • Integrated eSignatures with Vinesign for faster workflows.
  • • AI drafting and redlining via LOIS for Word.

What frustrates them

  • • 24-day delay to fix critical data exposure vulnerability.
  • • Not engineering-focused; code quality and security questioned.
  • • Very poor user experience for case tracking and notes.
  • • AI features feel bolted on, not deeply integrated.

Researched Jul 25, 2026

Harvey

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Jul 25, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Harvey”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Filevine or Harvey?

The best choice between Filevine and Harvey depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Filevine and Harvey?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Filevine or Harvey?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Filevine or Harvey comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: May 12, 2026