Hama vs The New Black
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Hama or The New Black: which should you choose?
| Dimension | Hama | The New Black |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Quick photo object removal | Fashion brands designing collections |
| Key feature | AI-powered object eraser with background fill | Text-to-fashion design + tech pack export |
| Output quality | Full resolution for web/social, not print pro | High-resolution, production-ready |
| Unlimited usage | Yes (free and unlimited) | No (limits on free tier) |
| Specialization | General photo editing | Apparel & accessories only |
Choose The New Black if you're in fashion design and need AI-generated apparel concepts with tech-ready exports. Choose Hama if you need instant, unlimited object removal from photos for free. They serve completely different needs and rarely overlap.
Hama erases objects, people, text, and blemishes from photos with a single AI brush — no download needed
Visit Website
AI fashion design studio: turn product photos, sketches or prompts into on-model shots, video and factory-ready tech packs
Visit WebsiteWhat do real users say about Hama vs The New Black?
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Hama
54 mentions across 6 sources · 12% positive — critical (weighted across 6 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Single-brush, browser-based erase is genuinely fast — no download or install required
- • Runs with JPG, PNG and WEBP uploads and lets you test the tool on a built-in example first
- • One Product Hunt user removed an extra person from a panorama where Photoshop's content-aware fill was too hard
- • Clean website, clear logo and straightforward upload-first homepage lower the barrier to trying it
What frustrates them
- • Vendor advises repeated erasing, implying single-pass results often leave visible artifacts
- • No layer stack, crop or color tools — the erase brush is the entire product
- • PRO HD downloads are unreviewed, so it's unclear what free-tier resolution limits actually are
- • The mask-based API has zero public feedback on output quality, latency or uptime
Researched Oct 25, 2026
The New Black
68 mentions across 5 sources · 18% positive — critical (averaged across 5 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Purpose-built for fashion: tech packs, virtual try-on, model generation.
- • Saves costs on photoshoots and technical drafting for small brands.
- • Brand DNA ensures consistency across designs.
- • Bulk generation speeds up catalog creation.
What frustrates them
- • Very little verified community feedback outside Product Hunt.
- • Not for non-fashion creative work; limited to apparel.
- • Pricing may be opaque; credits and hidden costs not clear.
- • Learning curve for tech packs and fashion-specific features.
Researched Aug 29, 2026
Who should pick Hama, and who should pick The New Black?
- Fashion startup founderPick: The New Black
Needs quick concept-to-prototype designs with tech pack exports; The New Black's fashion-specific AI delivers production-ready outputs.
- Social media content creatorPick: Hama
Frequently removes unwanted objects or people from photos; Hama's free unlimited eraser is efficient and instant.
- Apparel brand design teamPick: The New Black
Requires brand-consistent AI models, team management, and API for workflow integration (Business tier).
- E-commerce sellerPick: Hama
Needs to clean up product photos by removing backgrounds or objects; Hama's output suitable for online listings.
- Student on a budgetPick: Hama
Needs occasional image editing; Hama's free unlimited usage fits zero-budget requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Hama vs The New Black: which should you choose?
Choose The New Black if you're in fashion design and need AI-generated apparel concepts with tech-ready exports. Choose Hama if you need instant, unlimited object removal from photos for free. They serve completely different needs and rarely overlap.
Can The New Black remove objects from photos?
No, it generates fashion designs from text; for object removal use Hama.
Is Hama suitable for fashion design?
No, it only edits existing photos; cannot generate new clothing designs.
Which tool offers API access?
The New Black Business tier includes API access; Hama does not provide API.
Are there limits on Hama?
No, it's completely free and unlimited for text/object removal.
Can I export tech packs from Hama?
No, tech packs are exclusive to The New Black.
Which tool works offline?
Neither; both require internet browser access.
Is Hama's output print-quality?
Full resolution but not intended for high-res professional printing; The New Black offers production-ready resolution.
Can I use The New Black for non-fashion designs?
No, it's purpose-built for apparel and accessories; for other design tasks, consider a general AI tool.
What else are Hama and The New Black compared with?
These are not competitors — the shortlist decision never happens, so don't shop them against each other. If you make apparel, jewelry, or accessories and want one workspace from design to a factory br
These aren't alternatives — they're different jobs. PerfectPixel is for a game developer who wants to describe a character and get a walk cycle in eight directions as an engine-ready sprite sheet, run
If you run an apparel, jewelry, or accessory brand and need on-model imagery, video, tech packs, and Shopify-ready visuals, The New Black is the clear choice. If you just need free, private background
These aren't competitors — pick based on your job title, not features. If you run a clothing, jewelry or accessory label and need on-model imagery, try-on, lookbooks, video and a factory brief without
Where can you read more about Hama and The New Black?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: