Hama is live · free plan; paid price not published · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
Hama
Hama erases objects, people, text, and blemishes from photos with a single AI brush — no download needed
For a photo with one photobomber or a watermark you need gone in the next 30 seconds, Hama's zero-install brush-and-inpaint flow is hard to beat on speed. The documented image-plus-mask API is the genuinely interesting half for developers. Just size your expectations: one brush, repeated passes, and no queue mean this is a quick-fix tool, not a retouching workstation.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 63/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/hama
- Casual photographers fixing one photo in a single quick pass
- Social media creators cleaning an image right before posting
- E-commerce sellers touching up an individual product shot
- Developers who want an image-plus-mask object-removal endpoint
- Professional retouchers needing layer-based, pixel-perfect control
- Batch work across dozens of images — there's no queue
- Formats or file sizes outside the documented upload limits
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Hama if you need to process a folder of images in one sitting, work with files above 12MB, or want layer-based retouching control — the single erase brush is the whole product.
High definition exports sit behind PRO — the free path gives you the edit, but HD download is the upgrade
Hama's free entry and PRO tier for HD downloads suit individuals, creators, and small e-commerce sellers fixing images one at a time. Compare against heavier paid editors like Photoshop or Affinity Photo, which cost more but give you layers, batch processing, and pixel-level control, and against standalone object-removal apps that bundle batch queues Hama doesn't have.
In short
Hama — Hama erases objects, people, text, and blemishes from photos with a single AI brush — no download needed. Best for Casual photographers fixing one photo in a single quick pass, Social media creators cleaning an image right before posting, E-commerce sellers touching up an individual product shot. Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table.
What is Hama?
Hama — Hama erases objects, people, text, and blemishes from photos with a single AI brush — no download needed. Best for Casual photographers fixing one photo in a single quick pass, Social media creators cleaning an image right before posting, E-commerce sellers touching up an individual product shot. Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table.
Hama is a browser-based AI object removal tool from Sandoll Metalab Inc. Upload a photo, brush over whatever you want gone, and Hama inpaints the erased region with surrounding background that blends back into the scene. The homepage opens directly on an upload box with a "Try with an example" button, so you can see how the inpaint behaves on a landscape or cityscape before you commit your own file. The tool is deliberately narrow. One brush marks the area; erase repeatedly is the vendor's own advice for stubborn regions, which tells you a single pass won't always be clean. There's no layer stack, no color grading, no crop suite — the erase brush is the product. Documented removal cases include spots, freckles, pimples, wrinkles and blemishes in portraits, plus obstruction removal in landscape, cityscape and product shots. For developers, Hama documents a mask-based API: you send the original image plus a mask image, Hama processes the pair, and returns the finished image. That turns a consumer editor into an object-removal endpoint you can call from inside your own app instead of routing users to a separate tool. Vendor use cases span photo apps, template businesses, e-commerce, web builders, maps, and media. Signing up free gets you started; PRO is positioned around high definition (HD) downloads. Against general-purpose editors, Hama trades control for speed — you give up layers and pixel-level retouching to get a two-click removal in a tab.
Key features
- AI object removal that inpaints erased areas with surrounding background
- Removes people, objects, text, watermarks, and blemishes from photos
- Single-brush selection for marking the erase region
- Repeated-erase workflow advised by the vendor for stubborn areas
- Upload JPG, PNG, and WEBP files in the browser
- No software download — runs in a web browser
- Try-with-an-example demo built into the homepage
- Free signup; PRO unlocks high definition (HD) downloads
- Mask-based API: send the original image plus a mask image
- API returns the final inpainted image for use in your own product
- Portrait cleanup: spots, freckles, pimples, wrinkles, blemishes
- Obstruction removal for landscape, cityscape, and product photos
- Documented use cases across photo apps, templates, e-commerce, web builders, maps, media
Behind the verdict
Where Hama earns its place is the friction it removes before the edit. No install, no account to try it, an example image one click away. If a client sends a product shot with a stray cable in frame and you need it gone before a 3pm post, this is the tab you open. Developers should look past the consumer UI at the mask-based API. Sending an original plus a mask and getting a finished image back is a clean contract, and it means you can bolt object removal onto an existing photo app without sending users elsewhere. The vendor lists photo apps, templates, e-commerce, web builders and maps as fits — that's a realistic spread. In practice, don't expect one pass to be perfect. Sandoll Metalab's own tip is to erase repeatedly for better performance, so budget two or three rounds on busy backgrounds — foliage, patterned fabric, complex reflections. Small, isolated marks inpaint more convincingly than huge sky-sized removals. When we'd pass: professional retouchers who need layer-based, pixel-perfect control will find the single brush constraining fast. Anyone batch-processing dozens of images in a session hits a wall, because there's no queue. Offline or air-gapped work is out too — it's a browser app. The closest alternative depends on your job. For full retouching control you're better served by a layer-based desktop editor; for a pure API endpoint, weigh Hama against building your own inpaint pipeline. Pick Hama when the job is one photo, one quick fix, and you want it done in the browser.
Limitations
- Uploads are capped at 12MB, so large raw files need downsizing first.
- Complex scenes with intricate textures or overlapping objects can produce visible artifacts, because inpainting guesses at what should be behind the removed element.
- There is no batch queue, so cleaning a folder of images means one at a time.
- Hama is browser-only, with no offline or desktop mode.
- Edits are erase-and-inpaint only: no layer system, no colour grading, no precision retouching controls.
- The homepage itself advises erasing repeatedly for better performance, an acknowledgement that one pass is not always clean.
- Portraits and product shots work best; heavily layered scenes are where it struggles.
as of 2026-10-15
Researching Hama? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Hama still active?
Hama is live · free plan; paid price not published · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Hama? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Hama?
What people actually say about Hama — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 6 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy) · researched Oct 25, 2026.
Weighted by the 54 posts each of 6 sources contributed.
- +Single-brush, browser-based erase is genuinely fast — no download or install required
- +Runs with JPG, PNG and WEBP uploads and lets you test the tool on a built-in example first
- +One Product Hunt user removed an extra person from a panorama where Photoshop's content-aware fill was too hard
- +Clean website, clear logo and straightforward upload-first homepage lower the barrier to trying it
- +Free signup tier makes casual object removal accessible with no upfront cost
- −Vendor advises repeated erasing, implying single-pass results often leave visible artifacts
- −No layer stack, crop or color tools — the erase brush is the entire product
- −PRO HD downloads are unreviewed, so it's unclear what free-tier resolution limits actually are
- −The mask-based API has zero public feedback on output quality, latency or uptime
- −The 'Hama' name collides with a major accessory brand, burying genuine reviews in search
- • Free-tier resolution limits aren't documented in community feedback, so upgrade pressure may only appear at export
- • The API's pricing and rate limits are not disclosed in the available data
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Hama— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 25 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Hama 10 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed our verdict, who it suits, who should skip it, summary, description, pricing tiers, features
- — changed use cases, who should skip it, pricing fit, our verdict, setup time, summary, features, hidden costs, description, limitations, switching in, switching out, who it suits
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed who should skip it, pricing tiers, who it suits, features, summary, our verdict, description
- — changed setup time, who it suits, description, our verdict, features, hidden costs, limitations, switching in, switching out, who should skip it, pricing tiers, pricing fit, summary, use cases
- — changed SSL certificate, domain expiry
Showing the 6 most recent of 10 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Hama cost in 2026?
Hama: Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table. Pricing last verified 25 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Hama tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Casual photographers, social media creators, and anyone fixing a single image who doesn't want to install software or create an account to tryAdds: Starting free entry point: upload JPG, PNG, or WEBP up to 12MB, brush-based object removal, no account required to try |
| PRO | Not disclosed on page | — | Creators and e-commerce sellers who need the final edit at full quality for a listing, post, or client-facing imageAdds: Adds high definition (HD) downloads for full-quality export of edited images over the free path |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Hama's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Hama's free entry and PRO tier for HD downloads suit individuals, creators, and small e-commerce sellers fixing images one at a time. Compare against heavier paid editors like Photoshop or Affinity Photo, which cost more but give you layers, batch processing, and pixel-level control, and against standalone object-removal apps that bundle batch queues Hama doesn't have.
Has Hama's pricing changed?
No plan price for Hama has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Hama?
Pick Hama if you are Casual photographers fixing one photo in a single quick pass, Social media creators cleaning an image right before posting, E-commerce sellers touching up an individual product shot, Developers who want an image-plus-mask object-removal endpoint.
Look elsewhere if you are Professional retouchers needing layer-based, pixel-perfect control, Batch work across dozens of images — there's no queue, Formats or file sizes outside the documented upload limits, Offline or air-gapped editing — Hama runs in the browser.
Skip it if Skip Hama if you need to process a folder of images in one sitting, work with files above 12MB, or want layer-based retouching control — the single erase brush is the whole product.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Hama actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You shot a product flat-lay and a stray cable is in frame. You open Hama in the browser, upload the JPG, brush over the cable, and let it inpaint the background.
Outcome: A clean image in a couple of minutes with no install and no account required to try, and the vendor's advice to erase repeatedly cleans up any leftover edge.
A listing photo has dust and a small logo on the packaging. You upload the file, brush each spot, and export for the product page.
Outcome: Cleaner listing imagery without opening a full editor, though each image is handled one at a time since there is no batch queue.
Your app needs object removal without sending users to a separate editor. You send the original image and a mask image to the documented Hama API.
Outcome: Hama processes the pair and returns the final image, so removal becomes a step inside your own product instead of a detour.
Use cases
- Remove a photobomber from a vacation photo with one brush stroke
- Clean up product shots by erasing dust, logos, or background clutter
- Delete unwanted text or a watermark from an image
- Fix scanned photos by brushing out scratches and blemishes
- Retouch a portrait by removing spots, freckles, pimples, and wrinkles
- Prep a social media image by removing distracting background elements
- Call the mask-based API from your own photo-editing app instead of routing users elsewhere
- Clean up a screenshot before sharing it in documentation or chat
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Hama — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
No install and no account needed to try — casual users reach first value in under five minutes: open the site, upload a JPG, PNG, or WEBP up to 12MB, brush the object, and download. Developers wiring the mask-based API should add time for producing mask images and integrating the send-image-plus-mask call into their pipeline.
Switching to or from Hama
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Photoshop or Affinity Photo: for single quick removals, skip the install and layers and brush the object out in the browser instead
- →From manual clone-stamp retouching: upload the photo, brush the area, and let Hama inpaint the background behind it
- →From routing users to a separate editor: call the documented mask-based API (original image plus mask) from inside your product
- ↗To Photoshop or Affinity Photo: when you need layers, batch actions, and pixel-perfect retouching control beyond erase-and-inpaint
- ↗To a batch-capable object-removal pipeline: when you are processing folders of images and Hama's one-at-a-time workflow becomes the bottleneck
- ↗To a desktop editor: when you need to work offline or on files larger than the 12MB upload cap
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Hama”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Hama” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Hama.
Official links
What are the best Hama alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Hama we list are Cleanup.pictures, Magic-Eraser and Image Object Removal API. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cleanup.pictures | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Magic-Eraser | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Image Object Removal API | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Hama
View all
Cleanup.pictures
Browser-based AI inpainting that removes people, text, and defects from photos in seconds, with no account needed for 720p exports.
Magic-Eraser
Magic-Eraser is a browser-based AI eraser for removing watermarks, logos, objects, people, and text from photos and video.
Image Object Removal API
Image object removal API that erases unwanted objects from photos with LaMa inpainting masks for roughly $0.00085 per run.
Tools that pair well with Hama
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Hama, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Cleanup.pictures
Browser-based AI inpainting that removes people, text, and defects from photos in seconds, with no account needed for 720p exports.
Magic-Eraser
Magic-Eraser is a browser-based AI eraser for removing watermarks, logos, objects, people, and text from photos and video.
Image Object Removal API
Image object removal API that erases unwanted objects from photos with LaMa inpainting masks for roughly $0.00085 per run.
Hama vs its closest rival
Hama's closest head-to-head is with Qoves — If you want a scientifically-backed, non-surgical facial improvement plan and are willing to pay for it, QOVES is your tool. If you need free, unlimited photo object removal with no frills, Hama is the clear choice. They serve completely different needs. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Hama vs Qoves
If you want a scientifically-backed, non-surgical facial improvement plan and are willing to pay for it, QOVES is your tool. If you need free, unlimited photo object removal with no frills, Hama is the clear choice. They serve completely different needs.
GeneratedHama vs The New Black
Choose The New Black if you're in fashion design and need AI-generated apparel concepts with tech-ready exports. Choose Hama if you need instant, unlimited object removal from photos for free. They serve completely different needs and rarely overlap.
GeneratedHama vs Adobe Firefly Services
Choose Hama for quick, free, unlimited object removal on single images—it's perfect for casual users and social media creators. Pick Adobe Firefly Services if you need enterprise-grade generative AI APIs to automate content creation at scale, with compliance and integration into Adobe's ecosystem; its usage-based pricing suits organizations with predictable volume.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Categories
Topics
Used Hama? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.