innerai.com vs Poke (Interaction Co.)
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
innerai.com or Poke (Interaction Co.): which should you choose?
| Dimension | innerai.com | Poke (Interaction Co.) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Paid; annual Lite 12x R$49,90/mo, or R$99,90/mo monthly | Freemium; Ultra at $199/mo billed monthly |
| Core interface | Web + iOS + Android app workspace | Text/voice in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram, RCS |
| Breadth vs depth | 50+ models, image/audio/slides, docs, prompts, assistants | Narrow but deep on email, calendar, reminders, automations |
| Email & calendar | Not a documented feature set | Gmail/Outlook send+labels, @poke.com address, scheduling |
| Team/admin features | Department prompts, reusable assistants, LGPD positioning | None documented — personal product |
| Language/support | Portuguese-first UI, live chat support 7 days/week | Not specified in provided data |
These only overlap on the word 'AI subscription'. If your problem is producing marketing, legal, HR or academic work across many frontier models in Portuguese with a bill your finance team can approve, Inner AI is the pick — swap five direct subscriptions for one. If your problem is that your inbox, calendar and reminders are scattered across apps you never open, Poke is the pick, and the $199/mo Ultra tier is a real-world-task spend, not a writing one. Almost nobody should be choosing between them; the deciding question is whether your work output is documents or errands.
Inner AI gives Brazilian teams one Portuguese-first subscription for 50+ AI models, from chat to image, audio and slide generation.
Visit Website
Poke is an AI personal assistant you text on Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram or RCS to run email, calendar and reminders
Visit WebsiteHow do innerai.com and Poke (Interaction Co.) compare feature by feature?
Inner AI is a production workspace built around a chat canvas: you pick from 50+ models (Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT 6, Gemini 4 Argon and others), then do document analysis, web research (Pro), email drafting, image generation across Luma/Leonardo/Ideogram/Nano Banana Pro, audio and slide generation. On top sit 250+ prompts organized by department and custom assistants for recurring jobs like contract review or data analysis (Pro), plus Inner Academy's 7 certified courses (Pro). Team-oriented on the content side, but not a collaboration-seat product.
Poke inverts this. There's no canvas: the product is a thread in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram or RCS where you text or send voice. Its depth is connective — Gmail and Outlook search, draft, send and label management, a @poke.com address you can route primary email through, event scheduling with availability checks, reminders, and proactive background automations that fire on your schedule. Poke Ultra adds real humans for reservations, calls, ordering and ride booking (June 2026), website deploys at yourname.poke.com, PDF/LaTeX generation and table/chart building from a photo of spreadsheet data. Integrations listed: Notion, Oura, Gmail, Outlook, Granola, PostHog, TripIt, Todoist.
The honest split is output type. Inner AI generates deliverables — decks, images, contracts, posts. Poke executes errands and keeps your inbox and calendar moving. Inner AI has no documented API; Poke has MCP/custom-integration extension. Pick by what you need to hand off.
Which is cheaper, innerai.com or Poke (Interaction Co.)?
Inner AI is a single paid subscription with a clear ladder: annual Lite at 12x R$49,90/mo, or R$99,90/mo paying monthly. The vendor's pitch is consolidation — five direct model subscriptions framed at roughly R$600/month versus one Inner bill. The catch is tiering: Lite caps heavy advanced-model use at 120 messages a month, unlimited chat applies only to fast models (Claude 5.5 Haiku, GPT 6 Instant, Gemini 3.5 Flash), and documents/research, custom assistants and Inner Academy sit behind Pro. 'Unlimited' plans carry fair-use throttling, so high-volume operations should size up rather than assume flat cost.
Poke is freemium with one disclosed premium tier: Ultra at $199/mo billed monthly, which carries frontier intelligence on every action, the human-assist feature, website deploys and advanced generation. Reported news puts Poke joining Cognition (July 2026), with the product working as before.
Commercially these are different budgets. Inner AI is priced in reais per seat and reads like a software line item a Brazilian team can expense; the savings argument only holds if you were genuinely paying for several model subscriptions. Poke Ultra at $199/mo is closer to a concierge retainer — defensible only if the real-world task volume (reservations, calls, orders) is high. Casual users should stay on the free tier; the company itself frames Ultra as a power-user tier.
Who should pick innerai.com, and who should pick Poke (Interaction Co.)?
- Brazilian marketing teamPick: innerai.com
Portuguese-first UI, 250+ prompts by department, image generation across four engines and slide output map directly onto social and blog production — plus live chat support seven days a week.
- Legal or HR staff reusing the same workflowsPick: innerai.com
Custom assistants for contract review and recurring writing (Pro), plus department prompt libraries, beat retyping the same request every week.
- Busy operator drowning in inbox and calendarPick: Poke (Interaction Co.)
Gmail/Outlook send-and-label, @poke.com routing, scheduling and proactive reminders arrive in the messaging app already open on their phone.
- Oura-wearing quantified-self userPick: Poke (Interaction Co.)
Oura, Todoist and Granola integrations plus background automations mean sleep and readiness insights and action items land in-thread without prompting.
- Agency needing multi-model output for clientsPick: innerai.com
Switching between Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT 6 and Gemini 4 Argon in one login with project folders is the consolidation play; Poke is documented as a personal, not shared, product.
Frequently Asked Questions
innerai.com vs Poke (Interaction Co.): which should you choose?
These only overlap on the word 'AI subscription'. If your problem is producing marketing, legal, HR or academic work across many frontier models in Portuguese with a bill your finance team can approve, Inner AI is the pick — swap five direct subscriptions for one. If your problem is that your inbox, calendar and reminders are scattered across apps you never open, Poke is the pick, and the $199/mo Ultra tier is a real-world-task spend, not a writing one. Almost nobody should be choosing between them; the deciding question is whether your work output is documents or errands.
Can I use Inner AI and Poke together?
Yes, and plenty of people will: Inner AI for deliverables like documents, images and slides, Poke as the assistant that sits in your message threads handling email and scheduling. Nothing in either dataset suggests they conflict — they occupy different apps.
Which one works in Portuguese?
Inner AI documents a Portuguese-first interface and Portuguese-language live chat support. Poke's provided data doesn't specify language support, so don't assume either way — test the free tier.
Does Poke replace Inner AI for writing?
No. Poke's documented generation is narrow — PDFs with LaTeX, tables and charts from spreadsheet data or a photo, and websites on Ultra. Inner AI covers document templates, slide decks, image generation and long-form drafting across 50+ models.
Is there a free way to try Poke?
Yes — Poke's pricing type is freemium. Ultra at $199/mo billed monthly is the disclosed paid tier and gates the human-assist feature and website building.
What happened to Poke after the Cognition deal?
Reported on 2026-07-23, the Interaction Company of California joined Cognition, the makers of Devin. Poke is reported to work exactly as before, with Cognition's models and infrastructure behind it.
Can I build on either platform?
Poke documents custom integrations and MCP servers for developers. Inner AI has no raw API access documented on its site.
Is Inner AI suitable for a team bigger than a few people?
Unknown from the data. The desk-facing feature set — department prompts, reusable assistants, LGPD-aligned positioning, one consolidated bill — fits team usage, but shared workspace/admin controls aren't documented. Poke is explicitly personal: no shared seats or admin controls.
What else are innerai.com and Poke (Interaction Co.) compared with?
These two only overlap at the surface — both are AI you talk to. Chatbot App is a cheap, single-login way to chat with GPT-5.6 Luna and other models and get drafting and summarising done; it does not
These aren't substitutes, so there's no head-to-head winner to declare. Poke is for someone who wants email, calendar and reminders handled inside a messaging thread and will pay $199/mo billed monthl
You are not choosing between these — they do unrelated jobs. Pick Decide if your team makes recurring bets (hiring, build vs. buy) and never checks whether they worked; it forces the log-and-review lo
These aren't competitors, so there's no single winner — pick by the problem you have. If you're a Mac user who wants a free, hackable ChatGPT prompt bar that floats over whatever you're doing, macOS C
These aren't substitutes — a buyer would never shortlist both. Poke is a messaging-native assistant that handles your email, calendar, reminders and background automations, with real-world human help
These aren't competitors — they solve different problems for different buyers. If you're a creator monetizing an audience, Beacons AI is the relevant pick: a link page plus store, courses and Beam for
Where can you read more about innerai.com and Poke (Interaction Co.)?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: