Paloma vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionPalomaScreenplayIQ
Target UsersReal economy operations teamsScreenwriters & film industry
Core FunctionCustom AI-native software for physical operationsAI screenplay analysis & box office prediction
Pricing ModelCustom quote (contact sales)Free tier + Pro $19/mo + Studio $49/mo
Key IntegrationERP, email, chat, spreadsheetsPitchTrailer
Highlight FeatureNatural language query with traceable answersBox office performance prediction
LimitationNo self-service; requires consultationOnly English feature films under 150 pages

Paloma and ScreenplayIQ serve completely different industries: Paloma is for manufacturing and logistics teams needing custom operational AI, while ScreenplayIQ is for screenwriters and film studios predicting box office success. Choose Paloma if you run physical operations and need AI tailored to your workflows; choose ScreenplayIQ if you're in filmmaking and want data-driven script feedback. They are not substitutes.

Paloma
Paloma

Custom AI-native software for manufacturing and logistics operations.

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Paid
Plans
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
1 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
Web
WebAPI
Categories
🚚 Supply Chain & Logistics📊 Data & Analytics🧮 Business Intelligence
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Natural language querying of operational data
Traceable calculations with real math on real data
Full audit trail with timestamps and user attribution
Custom internal tool development
Automated data movement between ERP, email, chat, and reports
Digitization of pen-and-paper field data
Compliance checking across 15 languages
OEE tracking pulling from shop floor data
Inventory and logistics cost analysis
Data cleanup for messy records
Operational diagnostic to map core processes
Human-in-the-loop control for autonomous actions
Contextual AI learning business terminology and rules
WhatsApp order extraction into ERP
No-code integration with ERP, spreadsheets, emails, and chats
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration for pitch decks
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
PitchTrailer

What real users say: Paloma vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Paloma

62 mentions across 6 sources · 47% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • Promises math-based computation, not language prediction for accuracy.
  • Claims full audit trail with timestamps and user attribution.
  • Tailors AI to business-specific terminology and rules.
  • Offers trial engagement on highest-impact problem first.

What frustrates them

  • No real community validation or user reviews exist.
  • Hacker News suggests it's part of a 'scraping the bottom' YC batch.
  • Product Hunt listing appears to be for a different product.
  • GitHub repository is an old, unrelated Rails gem.

Researched Jul 26, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

7 mentions across 1 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • Pay-per-analysis avoids subscription lock-in.
  • Offers box office prediction, a unique feature.
  • Tailored feedback based on script length and TV options.
  • Includes character journey charts and beat sheets.

What frustrates them

  • Reported to nearly ruin a user's script feedback.
  • Expensive per analysis, up to $198.
  • No line-by-line editing, despite expectations.
  • Limited to English scripts only.

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Manufacturing ops manager
    Pick: Paloma

    Paloma is built for real economy teams needing custom AI to query inventory, costs, and automate workflows without in-house devs.

  • Screenwriter seeking market feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ provides data-driven structural analysis and box office prediction, essential for improving script marketability.

  • Logistics team tracing cost spikes
    Pick: Paloma

    Paloma can connect to ERP and emails to answer natural language questions about cost increases with traceability.

  • Film studio executive evaluating scripts
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ's comparative market data and box office predictions help slate decisions and quantify potential returns.

  • Operations leader without engineering team
    Pick: Paloma

    Paloma builds bespoke AI tools for you, leveraging its operational diagnostic to target the highest-impact problem first.

Frequently Asked Questions

Paloma vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

Paloma and ScreenplayIQ serve completely different industries: Paloma is for manufacturing and logistics teams needing custom operational AI, while ScreenplayIQ is for screenwriters and film studios predicting box office success. Choose Paloma if you run physical operations and need AI tailored to your workflows; choose ScreenplayIQ if you're in filmmaking and want data-driven script feedback. They are not substitutes.

Can Paloma help me analyze a screenplay?

No, Paloma is designed for manufacturing and logistics operations, not creative writing. Use ScreenplayIQ for screenplay analysis.

Does ScreenplayIQ integrate with my ERP system?

No, ScreenplayIQ only integrates with PitchTrailer. It cannot connect to operational systems like ERP. Paloma is the tool for that.

Do either tool offer a free trial?

ScreenplayIQ has a free tier (1 analysis/month). Paloma does not offer self-service free trial; it begins with a paid operational diagnostic.

How does Paloma handle data privacy?

Paloma includes audit trails and human-in-the-loop control, but specific privacy terms are not detailed in the provided facts. Contact Paloma for details.

Can ScreenplayIQ analyze scripts longer than 150 pages?

No, the AI context window limits analysis to scripts under 150 pages.

Which tool is better for a solo founder?

ScreenplayIQ is better for a solo screenwriter; Paloma is for real economy businesses, but requires team and budget.

Do either tools support real-time collaboration?

ScreenplayIQ Studio plan allows collaboration for up to 5 users. Paloma builds custom tools; collaboration features depend on custom solution.

Are there any recent pricing changes?

No recent news on pricing changes for either tool. ScreenplayIQ pricing remains at Free/Pro $19/Studio $49; Paloma is contact-based.

More Paloma or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026