PlanetScale vs Spider Cloud
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | PlanetScale | Spider Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Managed Postgres & Vitess MySQL (database) | Web scraping/crawl API for agents & RAG |
| Pricing model | Freemium — usage-based; Enterprise multi-region SLA | Freemium — pay-as-you-go + flat-rate Unlimited (geo targeting not on Unlimited) |
| Killer feature | Branch-per-environment with deploy requests & online schema changes | Crawl whole sites streamed as JSONL; unblocker + CAPTCHA handling |
| Storage/perf basis | Locally-attached NVMe, unlimited IOPS; 99.99% single-region SLA | Own browser + 215M+ residential/ISP exits across 199 countries |
| Notable integrations | Terraform, PgBouncer, AWS/GCP Marketplace, MCP | LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, Zapier, Claude Code, Cursor, MCP |
| Recent move | Neki (sharded Postgres) extensions via Terraform/CLI; per-shard Vitess sizing | Provider router in scrape/crawl bodies routes to outside providers on your keys |

PlanetScale: managed Vitess and Neki for horizontal sharding plus Postgres with NVMe speed
Visit Website
Spider Cloud is a web scraping, crawling, and search API that streams live pages as markdown or JSON for AI agents and RAG pipelines.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: PlanetScale vs Spider Cloud
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
PlanetScale
86 mentions across 5 sources · 63% positive — mixed (averaged across 5 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Blazing NVMe drives with unlimited IOPS for high-performance workloads.
- • Vitess horizontal sharding scales writes seamlessly for massive databases.
- • Branch-per-environment enables safe, revertable schema changes.
- • Automated failover across three availability zones for high availability.
What frustrates them
- • Vendor lock-in makes migration away from Vitess difficult.
- • DeWitt clause historically discouraged independent benchmarking.
- • Postgres feature set still lags behind MySQL/Vitess sharding.
- • Complexity of sharding and VSchema management can be overwhelming.
Researched Jul 26, 2026
Spider Cloud
No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Oct 14, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Spider Cloud”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.
Feature-by-feature
PlanetScale solves data storage and scale: managed Postgres plus Vitess, the MySQL-compatible sharding system, on locally-attached NVMe with unlimited IOPS, one primary and two replicas across three availability zones with automated failover, PgBouncer pooling on port 6432, read replicas, automated backups, Database Traffic Control query budgets, and Query Insights. Its signature workflow is branch-per-environment with deploy requests and online schema changes with revert — safe, reversible migrations. Recent releases extend this: Neki, its sharded Postgres, now supports extension management by name in Terraform and the pscale CLI, Vitess gets per-shard VTTablet sizing, and external MySQL databases can be attached as Vitess keyspaces without importing data. Spider Cloud solves data acquisition: one POST renders a page (scripts run, lazy images load, infinite scroll completes) into markdown, JSON, HTML, or text; crawls whole sites with pages streaming back as JSONL; offers a web search endpoint returning SERP results plus scraped pages and AI extraction in one call; and runs full browser sessions with anti-detection and CAPTCHA solving. The unblocker handles bot walls and geo checks with retries, backed by a 215M+ residential/ISP proxy network across 199 countries. Both expose an MCP server, and both let you script operations, but the overlap ends there — PlanetScale manages your persistence layer; Spider Cloud pulls the outside web into your pipeline, with a new provider router object routing requests to outside providers on your own keys.
Pricing compared
Both are freemium, but the meters measure completely different things. PlanetScale charges for a managed database — compute and storage for Postgres or Vitess, with a 99.99% single-region SLA and 99.999% multi-region on Enterprise. It's sold through self-serve and AWS/GCP Marketplaces, so real cost scales with cluster size, replicas, and regions rather than request count; there's no per-request meter to game. Spider Cloud charges per request on pay-as-you-go, or flat-rate on Unlimited, where concurrency is effectively unlimited and high-volume crawls beat metered billing — with two important caveats from the current data: geo-targeting isn't available on Unlimited (so geo-fenced crawls stay on pay-as-you-go), and residential/ISP proxy pools and AI extraction bill separately from base request pricing. Its own published alternatives research compares cost at 100,000 pages, which is the right unit for that product. Because the units differ — cluster hours versus pages fetched — a line-item price comparison is meaningless. Budget on intended use: PlanetScale is an infrastructure line item that grows with data and traffic served; Spider Cloud is a data-acquisition line item that grows with pages and browser sessions consumed.
Who should pick which
- Team shipping a high-traffic Postgres appPick: PlanetScale
NVMe-backed unlimited IOPS, PgBouncer pooling, read replicas, and multi-AZ failover target exactly this.
- Engineers who need safe schema migrationsPick: PlanetScale
Branch-per-environment with deploy requests and online schema changes with revert make risky migrations reversible.
- Company migrating off Aurora or RDSPick: PlanetScale
Positioned for lower latency and cost on NVMe storage, with Vitess for MySQL-compatible horizontal sharding.
- AI agent builder needing live web pagesPick: Spider Cloud
Renders pages as markdown or structured JSON on demand, with unblocker and CAPTCHA handling built into the request.
- RAG pipeline ingesting whole doc sitesPick: Spider Cloud
Streams crawl pages back as JSONL and exposes MCP plus LangChain/LlamaIndex integrations for minimal glue code.
Frequently Asked Questions
Would I ever use both?
Yes, and that's the more common pattern than choosing. Spider Cloud fetches and structures outside web data; PlanetScale stores your application's own Postgres or Vitess data. They sit at different layers, so there's no migration path from one to the other.
Which has a real free tier?
Both are listed as freemium. What each free tier meters is different — database cluster resources on PlanetScale, request/browser consumption on Spider Cloud — so check consumption limits against your expected page volume or cluster size before committing.
Does Spider Cloud's Unlimited plan cover everything?
No. The current data flags two exclusions: geo-targeting isn't available on Unlimited (geo-fenced crawls stay on pay-as-you-go), and residential/ISP proxy pools plus AI extraction bill separately from base request pricing. It also expects your client to handle HTTP 429s by backing off.
Can PlanetScale host data for a scraping pipeline?
It can store the results, but it does nothing on the acquisition side — rendering, proxies, CAPTCHAs, and crawling are entirely out of scope. You'd pair it with a fetcher like Spider Cloud, not use it as one.
Does Spider Cloud manage databases?
No. It has no managed Postgres, Vitess, failover, or schema-branching features. For persistence with branch-per-environment and deploy requests, look at PlanetScale.
What's newest on each side?
PlanetScale shipped Neki extension management via Terraform and the pscale CLI, per-shard Vitess sizing, and external keyspace attachment. Spider Cloud added a provider router object to scrape and crawl bodies that routes requests to outside providers on your own keys.
More PlanetScale or Spider Cloud comparisons
These aren't competitors, so there's no either/or decision here — most teams building agent products end up using both. If your problem is shipping and operating a web app or agent backend, Vercel is
These are not competitors. Power BI is a governed BI layer for Microsoft-centric organizations; Spider Cloud is HTTP plumbing that returns rendered web pages to agents and retrieval pipelines. If you
These are not competitors — they are two halves of a stack, and nobody should be choosing one over the other. Pick LM Studio if your problem is where inference runs: you want open models and the Bioni
These are not competitors — don't frame this as a pick-one decision. Spider Cloud is infrastructure you buy to get live web pages into an agent or retrieval pipeline; Amplitude is the analytics layer
These aren't competitors — pick based on the problem, not the price. If you need dashboards, governed self-service exploration, and agentic analytics on top of data you already store, Tableau is the b
These tools are not competitors — they solve different problems for different buyers. Spider Cloud is a developer API for pulling live web data into agents and RAG pipelines, with a freemium entry poi
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: September 26, 2026