Registry vs Temporal AI
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Registry | Temporal AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open source) | Freemium (Cloud with usage-based billing; self-hosted open source) |
| Core Function | Curated agent discovery catalog (ACP protocol) | Durable execution engine for workflows & agents |
| Key Feature | Versioned agent index, authentication requirement, JSON API | Automatic state capture, retries, human-in-the-loop, serverless workers |
| Integrations | GitHub, Zed Industries, JetBrains | OpenAI Agents SDK, Google ADK, Slack, NVIDIA, Salesforce, Twilio |
| Target User | Devs building ACP-compatible clients; agent creators | Teams needing crash-proof, durable agent workflows |
| Latest News | Logout & session close methods stabilized (May/Jun 2026) | Serverless Workers, Standalone Activities, Workflow Streams announced (Replay 2026); usage-based billing with Custom Roles pre-release (Jun 2026) |
If you need to discover and distribute ACP-compatible agents with authentication, pick Registry. If you need to build reliable, crash-proof AI workflows with state persistence, retries, and human-in-the-loop, pick Temporal AI. They solve different problems—Registry is a catalog, Temporal is a runtime.
Curated registry for discovering and installing authentication-gated ACP-compatible AI agents.
Visit Website
Durable execution platform keeping AI agents and workflows running through failures with automatic state capture and retries.
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- ACP agent developerPick: Registry
You need a distribution channel to list your ACP-compatible agent with authentication; Registry's curated index and JSON endpoint help clients discover your agent.
- AI agent workflow builderPick: Temporal AI
You need durable execution with retries, state persistence, and human-in-the-loop for mission-critical agent workflows; Temporal's SDKs and serverless workers are built for that.
- Client developer (ACP client)Pick: Registry
You need a programmatic way to find and install ACP agents; Registry's JSON endpoint and versioned entries make integration easy.
- Open source contributorPick: Registry
You can contribute agent listings via GitHub pull requests; Registry is community-driven and free.
- SaaS builder with multi-step flowsPick: Temporal AI
You need to orchestrate microservices with compensating transactions (Saga pattern) and long-running processes; Temporal's durability and visibility UI excel here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Registry vs Temporal AI: which should you choose?
If you need to discover and distribute ACP-compatible agents with authentication, pick Registry. If you need to build reliable, crash-proof AI workflows with state persistence, retries, and human-in-the-loop, pick Temporal AI. They solve different problems—Registry is a catalog, Temporal is a runtime.
Can I use Registry to run agents?
No, Registry is only a discovery catalog—you need an ACP-compatible client to actually run the agents.
Does Temporal AI support human-in-the-loop workflows?
Yes, via signals and pause/resume mechanisms, allowing a human to intervene mid-workflow.
Is Registry only for coding agents?
No, it supports multiple agent types, including general-purpose, though many listed agents are coding-focused.
What is the latest major feature in Temporal AI?
At Replay 2026, Temporal announced Serverless Workers (no worker management), Standalone Activities, and Workflow Streams for real-time interactivity.
Do I need to pay for Registry?
No, it's entirely free and open source.
Can Temporal AI replace a message queue?
Not directly; Temporal uses task queues internally but also provides workflow orchestration beyond queuing.
Does Registry have an API?
Yes, it provides a JSON endpoint for programmatic access: https://cdn.agentclientprotocol.com/registry/v1/latest/registry.json
What's the recent news about Registry's session management?
As of May/June 2026, the Logout method (ending authenticated state) and Session Close (canceling in-flight work) have been stabilized.
More Registry or Temporal AI comparisons
If you need to catch and fix production errors with AI-assisted root cause analysis and auto-remediation, Sentry is the right choice. If you're building AI agents or multi-step workflows that must sur
If you need to build reliable AI agents or durable multi-step workflows that survive failures, choose Temporal AI. If your primary need is API design, testing, and management with modern AI assistance
Temporal AI and Jira serve entirely different purposes. Temporal is a durable execution engine for building fault-tolerant AI agents and workflows, while Jira is an agile project management tool. Choo
Choose Temporal AI if your priority is rock-solid durability for long-running, stateful AI agents and microservices orchestration, especially where automatic retries and human-in-the-loop are critical
Pick Netlify if you need to deploy and host web applications fast, with built-in AI agent integrations and a database—perfect for prototyping and shipping. Choose Temporal AI if you're building missio
Temporal AI and Lift address completely different problems — durable orchestration vs. document parsing. If you're building AI agents or multi-step workflows that must survive failures, Temporal is th
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026