Registry
Curated registry for discovering and installing authentication-gated ACP-compatible AI agents.
If you're building ACP clients or shipping an ACP agent, this registry is the launchpad you need—the authentication gate is a trust mark most directories don't offer. The pull-request curation and programmatic API make discovery and integration painless. Skip it if you're outside the ACP world; its worth hinges on the protocol's adoption.
Verified 1d ago · liveness 73/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/registry
- Developers building ACP-compatible clients seeking a reliable agent directory
- Agent creators wanting a distribution channel to reach ACP users
- Teams needing a security-conscious, authentication-gated agent source
- Open-source contributors looking to shape the ACP ecosystem
- Non-technical users wanting a visual app store experience
- Agents that don't support authentication
- Teams requiring SLA-backed support or paid tiers
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip the ACP Registry if you're not building or using ACP-compatible agents—it's a protocol-specific directory, not a general-purpose app store, and its value is directly tied to the Agent Client Protocol's adoption.
The ACP Registry is free to use and open source, fitting individual developers, startups, and enterprises equally. Since it's free, it undercuts any paid agent marketplace, but it offers no premium tiers or support, so teams needing enterprise-grade support may find it lacking.
In short
Registry — Curated registry for discovering and installing authentication-gated ACP-compatible AI agents. Best for Developers building ACP-compatible clients seeking a reliable agent directory, Agent creators wanting a distribution channel to reach ACP users, Teams needing a security-conscious, authentication-gated agent source. Free to use.
What's new in Registry
Checked yesterdayAcross the latest 5 updates: 5 changelog entries.
Elicitation Stabilized in ACP
Elicitation RFD completed, stabilizing structured form and URL-mode interactions.
ACP v2 Draft Published
ACP v2 protocol documentation and schema published in draft form.
Boolean Config Options Stabilized
Boolean config option type stabilized for native on/off controls.
Request Cancellation Stabilized
$/cancel_request notification stabilized for canceling JSON-RPC requests by ID.
Rust and TypeScript SDKs Reach 1.0
Both ACP SDKs hit 1.0.0, providing stable foundations for clients, agents, and adapters.
What people actually say about Registry — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
64 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, App Store, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
- +Curated directory with authentication requirement enhances security.
- +Open source on GitHub allows community contributions via pull requests.
- +Supports a standardized protocol (ACP) for interoperability.
- +Free to use with no pricing tiers mentioned.
- +Includes versioned agent entries for tracking updates.
- −Very limited community feedback makes it hard to evaluate.
- −No user reviews or testimonials from actual users found.
- −Potential confusion with other products named 'Registry'.
- −ACP protocol may have limited ecosystem and support.
- −No information on update frequency or maintenance activity.
- • No hidden costs identified; tool is free and open source
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Registry? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Curated catalog of 55+ authentication-gated agents
- Programmatic access via CDN JSON endpoint
- Versioned metadata for each agent listing
- Optional icon support (16x16 SVG recommended)
- Fork-based submission workflow on GitHub
- agent.json schema for standardized submissions
- Distribution info for automatic installation
- Includes agents like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Devin, Claude Agent
- Includes general-purpose, DevOps, and specialized agents
- Authentication requirement for all listed agents
- Pull-request review for quality and compliance
- Community-driven curation via GitHub
- Compatibility with ACP v1 and v2 draft
About Registry
The ACP Registry is a curated directory where developers can discover and distribute AI agents that speak the Agent Client Protocol (ACP). Every agent listed supports authentication, providing a baseline of trust that generic marketplaces often skip. It's the essential hub for building ACP clients or shipping your own agent, offering vetted tools and a standardized installation path for users. The registry currently features over 55 agents, including major coding assistants like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Devin, Claude Agent, Gemini CLI, Grok Build, and Junie AI by JetBrains, plus general-purpose, DevOps, and specialized tools. Each entry carries versioned metadata, optional icons, and distribution details for automatic installation, so you can evaluate and install with confidence. Fetching the catalog is straightforward: hit the CDN endpoint with curl to get the latest registry.json, which includes everything needed for automated setup. Submitting your own agent follows a simple fork-based workflow on GitHub: fork the repo, add a folder with your agent's ID, include an agent.json per the schema, optionally add an icon.svg, and open a pull request. The maintainers curate submissions, ensuring quality and authentication compliance. The ACP ecosystem is moving fast. The v2 draft is published, boolean config options and request cancellation are stabilized, and Rust and TypeScript SDKs have hit 1.0. If you're working within ACP, this registry is your interoperable distribution channel—outside it, you won't see the value.
Behind the Verdict
The ACP Registry serves a narrow but critical niche: it's the official distribution channel for agents that speak the Agent Client Protocol, and the authentication requirement sets it apart from generic agent marketplaces. For developers building ACP clients, the programmatic CDN endpoint (curl https://cdn.agentclientprotocol.com/registry/v1/latest/registry.json) provides a machine-readable catalog with versioned metadata and distribution info, making agent discovery and installation automatable. For agent authors, the fork-based submission workflow on GitHub is straightforward and community-driven, with maintainers curating for quality and authentication compliance. The registry's strength is its focus: every listed agent supports authentication, which is a meaningful trust baseline for teams that need security-conscious tooling. It's also actively evolving with the protocol—recent stabilizations of boolean config options, request cancellation, session usage updates, and message IDs in ACP v1, plus the v2 draft, show a living ecosystem. However, this focus is also its limitation. If you're not working within ACP, the registry offers little value; it's not a general-purpose app store, and it doesn't provide AI models itself—it's an index. Non-technical users may find the GitHub-based workflow and CLI-oriented fetch model intimidating. The registry also doesn't offer SLA-backed support or paid tiers, which could be a concern for enterprise teams requiring formal support. For its intended audience—developers and teams embedded in the ACP ecosystem—it's an indispensable resource. For everyone else, it's a niche tool whose relevance depends entirely on the protocol's adoption. The recent news of ACP v2 draft publication and SDK 1.0 releases suggests momentum, but it's still early days.
Researching Registry? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Registry actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Build an ACP client that needs to list available agents.
Outcome: Fetch the registry.json from the CDN endpoint, parse the metadata, and present the vetted agents to users, enabling one-click installation.
Create an ACP-compatible agent and want to distribute it.
Outcome: Fork the registry repo, add your agent folder with agent.json and optional icon, submit a pull request, and get listed for thousands of potential users.
Standardize agent installation across a team's development environments.
Outcome: Use the registry's distribution info to automate agent setup, ensuring everyone runs authenticated, vetted agents.
Use Cases
- Discover and install ACP-compatible coding agents for your development workflow.
- Publish your own ACP agent to reach a wider audience of protocol-aware clients.
- Evaluate multiple agents side-by-side using versioned listings on the registry.
- Contribute to the open-source registry by suggesting new agents that support authentication.
- Integrate agent discovery into your custom client by fetching the registry index programmatically.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-01
Limitations
- The ACP Registry is a curated directory of ACP-compatible agents that support authentication.
- The registry lists agent names, versions, and descriptions as provided by their maintainers, but detailed usage and limitations are documented per agent.
- The registry does not itself provide AI models; it is an index of agents.
as of 2026-09-01
Verification history
We have re-verified Registry 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Registry tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Developers and teams of any size who need access to a curated, authentication-gated registry of ACP agents at no cost.
What this tier adds
This is the only tier and entry point, offering full access to the registry, CDN fetch, and GitHub submission workflow for free.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Registry's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
The ACP Registry is free to use and open source, fitting individual developers, startups, and enterprises equally. Since it's free, it undercuts any paid agent marketplace, but it offers no premium tiers or support, so teams needing enterprise-grade support may find it lacking.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Registry — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For users, no setup is needed to browse the registry—just visit the page or curl the CDN endpoint. For contributors, getting your agent listed takes about 30 minutes to fork, add the folder and agent.json, and open a pull request. Integrating the registry into a client can take a couple of hours to implement the fetch and parse logic.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
Registry · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
V1 · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
Rust · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
Typescript · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
Contributing · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
- Resourceagentclientprotocol.com
Updates · Registry
Helpful link from agentclientprotocol.com
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Registry vs Spider Cloud
If you need to discover ACP-compatible agents and contribute to a secure, open ecosystem, Registry is your tool — it's free and protocol-first. If you need real-time web data for AI agents or RAG pipelines, Spider Cloud offers a powerful, pay-as-you-go scraping engine with a 99.9% success rate and extensive integrations. Choose Registry for agent discovery; choose Spider Cloud for web data extraction.
Registry vs Presto Voice
Registry and Presto Voice serve completely different markets. Pick Registry if you're a developer needing a free, open-source directory of ACP-compatible agents with authentication. Pick Presto Voice if you're a QSR chain looking to automate drive-thru orders with voice AI and boost revenue. They aren't competitors.
Registry vs Temporal Ai
If you need to discover and distribute ACP-compatible agents with authentication, pick Registry. If you need to build reliable, crash-proof AI workflows with state persistence, retries, and human-in-the-loop, pick Temporal AI. They solve different problems—Registry is a catalog, Temporal is a runtime.
Popular in MCP Servers & Agent Tooling
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Registry? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.


