Screenshot To Code vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Screenshot To Code | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open source; API usage costs) | Freemium ($0 free tier, Pro ~$34/mo annual) |
| Best For | Converting screenshots/designs to code | 3D scanning, floor plans, digital twins |
| Output Format | HTML+Tailwind, React+Tailwind, Vue+Tailwind, Bootstrap, Ionic+Tailwind | GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, STL, etc. |
| Key Feature | AI code generation from screenshots, recordings, Figma | LiDAR + photogrammetry + floor plan generation |
| Open Source | Yes (MIT license, 73k+ GitHub stars) | No |
| Latest News | No recent updates captured | HDRI lighting (5 presets), better library UI, floor plan editor improvements |
Polycam is for professionals needing accurate 3D scans and floor plans from real-world spaces; Screenshot to Code is for developers wanting to turn visual designs into code instantly. Choose Polycam if you work with physical environments (architecture, forensics, product design). Choose Screenshot to Code if you're a frontend developer or designer who needs rapid prototyping from screenshots or mockups.
AI-powered 3D scanning, floor plans, and reality capture for mobile, drones, and teams.
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- Architect/EngineerPick: Polycam
Needs accurate floor plans, measurements, and 3D models from on-site scans; Polycam's LiDAR and photogrammetry are purpose-built for this.
- Frontend DeveloperPick: Screenshot To Code
Rapidly prototypes UI from screenshots or Figma designs; Screenshot to Code generates clean, editable code for multiple frameworks.
- Forensics InvestigatorPick: Polycam
Fast scene documentation with LiDAR and photogrammetry; exports to point clouds (PLY, LAS) and integrates with analysis tools like CloudCompare.
- Product DesignerPick: Screenshot To Code
Converts mockups to code for developer handoff; supports Figma imports and multiple frontend stacks.
- Media Creator / VFX ArtistPick: Polycam
Scans props and sets for 3D assets; exports to USDZ, OBJ, FBX for game engines or VFX pipelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Screenshot To Code vs Polycam: which should you choose?
Polycam is for professionals needing accurate 3D scans and floor plans from real-world spaces; Screenshot to Code is for developers wanting to turn visual designs into code instantly. Choose Polycam if you work with physical environments (architecture, forensics, product design). Choose Screenshot to Code if you're a frontend developer or designer who needs rapid prototyping from screenshots or mockups.
Does Polycam support Android?
Yes, Polycam works on iOS (LiDAR), Android (ARCore), and web.
Can Screenshot to Code run offline?
Yes, you can run it locally via Docker or manual setup (FastAPI + React/Vite).
What file formats does Polycam export?
GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, LAS, STL, DAE, ESX, DXF, and point clouds.
Is Screenshot to Code truly free?
The code is free (MIT license), but you incur API costs for AI models and image generation services.
Does Polycam have a free tier?
Yes, with limited exports and credits per month.
Can Screenshot to Code convert screen recordings?
Yes, it has a video mode to convert screen recordings into functional prototypes.
Which is better for floor plans?
Polycam, which has automatic floor plan generation with measurements and a dedicated editor.
Does Screenshot to Code support Bootstrap?
Yes, it supports Bootstrap alongside Tailwind and other frameworks.
More Screenshot To Code or Polycam comparisons
Polycam and Airtable serve completely different needs: Polycam is a dedicated 3D scanning and reality capture tool for AEC and media professionals, while Airtable is a collaborative database platform
Polycam and Notion serve completely different purposes. Polycam is a specialized 3D scanning tool for professionals needing photogrammetry, floor plans, and drone mapping, while Notion is a general-pu
Polycam and Miro serve entirely different needs: Polycam is a specialized tool for capturing real-world 3D data (scanning, floor plans, drone mapping) while Miro is a broad collaboration platform for
Choosing between LM Studio and Polycam is straightforward: they solve completely different problems. LM Studio is ideal for developers who need private, offline LLM inference on their own hardware, wh
If you need reality capture and 3D scanning for architecture, construction, or forensics, Polycam is the clear choice. For product development teams seeking AI-native issue tracking, triage, and agent
Choose Polycam if you need reality capture—3D scanning objects, interiors, or floor plans for AEC, forensics, or game dev. Choose Sketch if you’re a macOS UI/UX designer who values native performance,
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026