Screenshot To Code vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Screenshot To Code | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Converting screenshots/designs to code | 3D scanning, floor plans, digital twins |
| Output Format | HTML+Tailwind, React+Tailwind, Vue+Tailwind, Bootstrap, Ionic+Tailwind | GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, STL, etc. |
| Key Feature | AI code generation from screenshots, recordings, Figma | LiDAR + photogrammetry + floor plan generation |
| Open Source | Yes (MIT license, 73k+ GitHub stars) | No |
| Latest News | No recent updates captured | HDRI lighting (5 presets), better library UI, floor plan editor improvements |
Polycam is for professionals needing accurate 3D scans and floor plans from real-world spaces; Screenshot to Code is for developers wanting to turn visual designs into code instantly. Choose Polycam if you work with physical environments (architecture, forensics, product design). Choose Screenshot to Code if you're a frontend developer or designer who needs rapid prototyping from screenshots or mockups.
Screenshot to Code converts screenshots, Figma files, and screen recordings into HTML, React, or Vue frontends you can actually run.
Visit Website
Polycam turns phone LiDAR, photos and drone footage into 3D models, floor plans and point clouds for AEC and real estate teams.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Screenshot To Code vs Polycam
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Screenshot To Code
20 mentions across 3 sources · 50% positive — mixed (averaged across 3 sources)
Hacker News, Product Hunt, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Free and open source with MIT license.
- • Converts screenshots to multiple frameworks including React, Vue, Bootstrap.
- • Active GitHub community with 73k+ stars and frequent updates.
- • Supports Figma designs, not just screenshots.
What frustrates them
- • Fails to capture animations, loading states, or transitions.
- • Static output—only layout, no interactive behavior.
- • Quality varies with the AI model used.
- • Limited community discussion outside of GitHub.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Polycam
64 mentions across 5 sources · 49% positive — mixed (weighted across 5 sources)
Reddit, Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store
What users praise
- • Fast one-visit site capture with phone LiDAR — no dedicated scanner hardware required
- • Floor plan generation with editable walls, fixtures, and room labels is genuinely useful for AEC walkthroughs
- • Wide export coverage: seven mesh formats plus six point cloud formats including LAS and Geo-LAS
- • Cross-platform (iOS, Android, web) means teams can scan on the phone they already carry
What frustrates them
- • Auto-renew after the 7-day trial has produced multiple 1-star 'scam' App Store reviews
- • Support is 'slow' and 'the worst' per Reddit — no phone line, weeks of silence on billing issues
- • Measurement accuracy is inconsistent — one App Store reviewer calls results 'very inaccurate'
- • Free tier feels like adware: 3 AI captures, 150 images, features that used to be free are paywalled
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- Architect/EngineerPick: Polycam
Needs accurate floor plans, measurements, and 3D models from on-site scans; Polycam's LiDAR and photogrammetry are purpose-built for this.
- Frontend DeveloperPick: Screenshot To Code
Rapidly prototypes UI from screenshots or Figma designs; Screenshot to Code generates clean, editable code for multiple frameworks.
- Forensics InvestigatorPick: Polycam
Fast scene documentation with LiDAR and photogrammetry; exports to point clouds (PLY, LAS) and integrates with analysis tools like CloudCompare.
- Product DesignerPick: Screenshot To Code
Converts mockups to code for developer handoff; supports Figma imports and multiple frontend stacks.
- Media Creator / VFX ArtistPick: Polycam
Scans props and sets for 3D assets; exports to USDZ, OBJ, FBX for game engines or VFX pipelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Screenshot To Code vs Polycam: which should you choose?
Polycam is for professionals needing accurate 3D scans and floor plans from real-world spaces; Screenshot to Code is for developers wanting to turn visual designs into code instantly. Choose Polycam if you work with physical environments (architecture, forensics, product design). Choose Screenshot to Code if you're a frontend developer or designer who needs rapid prototyping from screenshots or mockups.
Does Polycam support Android?
Yes, Polycam works on iOS (LiDAR), Android (ARCore), and web.
Can Screenshot to Code run offline?
Yes, you can run it locally via Docker or manual setup (FastAPI + React/Vite).
What file formats does Polycam export?
GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, LAS, STL, DAE, ESX, DXF, and point clouds.
Is Screenshot to Code truly free?
The code is free (MIT license), but you incur API costs for AI models and image generation services.
Does Polycam have a free tier?
Yes, with limited exports and credits per month.
Can Screenshot to Code convert screen recordings?
Yes, it has a video mode to convert screen recordings into functional prototypes.
Which is better for floor plans?
Polycam, which has automatic floor plan generation with measurements and a dedicated editor.
Does Screenshot to Code support Bootstrap?
Yes, it supports Bootstrap alongside Tailwind and other frameworks.
More Screenshot To Code or Polycam comparisons
Don't cross-shop these. Polycam is a capture tool that turns the physical world — rooms, prototypes, job sites — into 3D models, floor plans, and point clouds you export to SketchUp, Blender, or Unity
These are not competitors and you should never be choosing between them — Polycam is a capture tool that turns a phone, drone, or LiDAR scan into a 3D model, floor plan, or point cloud, and Notion is
These two don't compete — a buyer almost never chooses between them. Polycam is a capture tool: you point a phone, drone or LiDAR at a physical space and get floor plans, meshes and point clouds you c
These two products never meet in a buying decision, and treating them as rivals would mislead you. If your problem is documenting a physical site — rooms, buildings, props, a claims scene — Polycam is
These tools don't compete — they solve unrelated problems, and no buyer shortlists both. If your problem is running open models locally (GLM, Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen3.8) for private agentic work, LM Stud
You are not choosing between these. Polycam and Sketch solve different problems for different people, and no buyer with one budget and one job shortlists both. Pick Polycam if you need to digitise a p
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026