Tines vs Torq

Core Capabilities: Tines vs Torq

Tines offers a no-code storyboard builder for creating workflows across security and IT, with a universal AI copilot (Workbench) that can generate workflows from natural language. It also includes built-in case management (Cases) and autonomous agents for workflow activity. Torq is built specifically for security automation, featuring a no-code workflow builder with AI agents for autonomous triage, natural language query via Socrates, and agentic threat hunting. Both platforms support human-in-the-loop oversight. Tines wins in versatility (IT + security), while Torq wins in depth for SOC use cases.

AI/Model Approach: Tines vs Torq

Tines integrates AI via Workbench (universal copilot) and AI agents that can interact with workflows and users. It supports AI integration within workflows and leverages OpenAI among its integrations. Torq offers agentic AI that autonomously triages alerts, conducts threat hunts, and uses natural language (Socrates) for querying. Torq’s AI is purpose-built for security operations, providing automated investigation and response. Tines’ AI is more general-purpose, while Torq’s AI is specialized for SOC tasks. Ties for AI functionality within their respective domains.

Integrations & Ecosystem: Tines vs Torq

Tines connects with any tool that has an API, listing specific integrations like Slack, Jira, CrowdStrike, Okta, OpenAI, and GreyNoise. It provides a pre-built workflow library with hundreds of stories. Torq integrates with 150+ tools including CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Splunk, ServiceNow, and AWS, and offers a custom integration builder via the Torq Store. Torq has a larger number of pre-built integrations, but Tines’ API-based approach theoretically covers any tool. Torq wins for breadth of pre-built security integrations; Tines wins for flexibility across domains.

Performance & Scale: Tines vs Torq

Tines supports nested folders for organization, monitoring dashboards, and role-based access control. It offers self-hosting options on Business/Enterprise plans and is used by large companies like Canva and Snowflake. Torq provides parallel workflow execution, real-time API monitoring, and audit logging. Torq is designed for hyperautomation in enterprise SOCs. Both scale well, but Tines’ self-hosting and community edition give it an edge for organizations that require on-premise deployment or low-cost scaling. Tines wins for deployment flexibility.

Developer Experience & Workflow: Tines vs Torq

Tines provides a visual storyboard builder, formula engine for data transformation, and pre-built workflow library. It also offers Tines University for certification and learning paths, plus Slack community support. Torq has a no-code builder with AI agents, natural language query, and a custom integration builder. Torq’s focus is on rapid security workflow creation with AI assistance. Tines’ learning resources and community are more extensive, making it easier for new users to get started. Tines wins for developer onboarding and community support.

Tines pricing (2026)

Tines offers a freemium model with a Community Edition at $0 per month, a Starter plan at $600 per month, and custom-priced Business and Enterprise plans. The Community Edition allows free exploration of workflows and automation with limitations. The Starter plan provides more features for growing teams. Business and Enterprise include self-hosting options and dedicated support. No overage fees or contract terms are publicly mentioned, but custom plans likely involve annual commitments.

Torq pricing (2026)

Torq offers only an Enterprise plan with custom pricing. There is no free tier, no self-service signup, and no published pricing for smaller teams. The plan includes security automation, AI workflows, incident response, and integrations. Pricing requires contacting sales, which may exclude smaller organizations. The lack of transparent pricing could be a barrier for teams wanting to evaluate the platform without commitment.

Value-per-dollar: Tines vs Torq

For most teams, Tines offers better value-per-dollar due to its freemium entry point and transparent Starter pricing. Torq’s custom-only pricing makes it less accessible for small to mid-size teams. Tines wins for cost-conscious teams and those wanting to start small and scale. However, Torq may provide faster time-to-value for dedicated SOC teams that can justify higher investment through improved incident response efficiency. For security-only use cases in large enterprises, Torq’s specialized feature set may offset its higher cost.