Unstract vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionUnstractScreenplayIQ
PricingFreemium (BYO keys), usage-based scalingFree (1 analysis/mo), Pro $19/mo, Studio $49/mo
Primary Use CaseDocument data extraction from unstructured PDFs/imagesScreenplay analysis & box office prediction
Core TechnologyMulti-agent LLM extraction, LLMWhisperer OCR, Agentic Prompt StudioAI narrative analysis, market data comparison, beat sheet generation
Target AudienceDevelopers & data engineers in finance, insurance, healthcareScreenwriters, producers, studio executives
DeploymentManaged cloud, on-premise, open-sourceCloud SaaS only
Latest News2026: Multi-agent table extraction, LLMWhisperer OCR for complex formsNo recent news

Choose Unstract if you need to extract structured data from messy business documents at scale — its multi-agent OCR and prompt studio dominate complex tables and handwriting. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you write feature films and want quantitative market feedback on a script's box office potential. They serve completely different jobs, so let your actual problem (document processing vs. screenplay evaluation) guide the decision.

Unstract
Unstract

Open-source agentic document extraction that converts unstructured files into structured data

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$499/mo (monthly) or $416/mo (annual)
$2,249/mo (monthly) or $1,874/mo (annual)
Custom
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
WebAPICLI
WebAPI
Categories
📑 Document AI & Data Extraction
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Prompt Studio for crafting generic extraction prompts
Agentic Prompt Studio auto-generates schema, prompts, and validation
LLMChallenge uses two LLMs to contest each field
Single Pass Extraction reduces token usage
Summarized Extraction reduces token usage
Multi-agent table extraction with six agents plus codegen
Human-in-the-Loop verification
LLMWhisperer OCR with layout-preserving mode
Handwriting detection
Checkbox and radio button detection
Pre-built APIs: Table Extraction, PDF Splitter, Invoice, Bank Statement, Purchase Order, Bill of Lading
Unstract MCP Server for integration
ETL pipelines with connectors to cloud storage and data warehouses
Bring your own LLM, embedding model, and vector DB
Versioning and rollback for prompts
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration for pitch decks
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
n8n
Slack
PitchTrailer

What real users say: Unstract vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Unstract

50 mentions across 2 sources · 73% positive

Hacker News, YouTube

What users praise

  • Handles variable documents without templates, adapting to any layout.
  • LLMChallenge reduces hallucinations by requiring two LLMs to agree.
  • Token usage cut by up to 7x with Single Pass and Summarized modes.
  • LLMWhisperer preserves layout, great for complex tables and handwritten notes.

What frustrates them

  • Learning curve for crafting effective prompts in Prompt Studio.
  • Onboarding requires setting up your own LLM and vector DB after trial.
  • Scale-out questions unanswered: 300 docs at once? Unclear capacity.
  • Sensitive data handling unclear, lacking transparent compliance guarantees.

Researched Aug 17, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

7 mentions across 1 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • Pay-per-analysis avoids subscription lock-in.
  • Offers box office prediction, a unique feature.
  • Tailored feedback based on script length and TV options.
  • Includes character journey charts and beat sheets.

What frustrates them

  • Reported to nearly ruin a user's script feedback.
  • Expensive per analysis, up to $198.
  • No line-by-line editing, despite expectations.
  • Limited to English scripts only.

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Finance data engineer
    Pick: Unstract

    Needs to extract data from thousands of invoices and bank statements; Unstract's multi-agent table extraction and LLMWhisperer OCR handle layouts and handwriting without templates.

  • Screenwriter seeking script feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Wants quantitative analysis of narrative structure and marketability; ScreenplayIQ provides beat sheets, pacing heatmaps, and box office prediction.

  • Insurance document processing team
    Pick: Unstract

    Requires accurate extraction from complex forms with compliance needs; Unstract's on-premise deployment and Human-in-the-Loop verification ensure data sovereignty and accuracy.

  • Studio executive evaluating scripts
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Needs data-driven box office forecasts for slate decisions; ScreenplayIQ's comparative market data and genre classification support this.

  • Developer building document pipeline
    Pick: Unstract

    Prefers API-first, open-source tools with MCP Server integration; Unstract's Agentic Prompt Studio and BYO keys fit into existing stacks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Unstract vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

Choose Unstract if you need to extract structured data from messy business documents at scale — its multi-agent OCR and prompt studio dominate complex tables and handwriting. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you write feature films and want quantitative market feedback on a script's box office potential. They serve completely different jobs, so let your actual problem (document processing vs. screenplay evaluation) guide the decision.

Can Unstract handle handwritten text?

Yes, LLMWhisperer OCR includes handwritten text detection and checkbox/radio button detection, as highlighted in 2026 news.

Does ScreenplayIQ support TV scripts or short films?

No, it only supports English feature films; scripts over 150 pages have context window limitations.

Which tool offers on-premise deployment?

Unstract offers managed cloud, on-premise, and open-source deployment; ScreenplayIQ is cloud SaaS only.

How does Unstract reduce token usage?

Through Single Pass and Summarized Extraction modes, which can reduce token usage by up to 7x.

What is the Free tier of ScreenplayIQ?

It allows one analysis per month with limited features; Pro ($19/mo) offers unlimited analyses and market data.

Can I integrate Unstract with n8n?

Yes, Unstract provides an MCP Server for integration with stacks like n8n.

Does ScreenplayIQ generate pitch decks?

Yes, via PitchTrailer integration for pitch deck generation.

Which tool is better for table extraction?

Unstract, with its multi-agent table extraction (6 agents + codegen step) specifically designed for complex table layouts.

More Unstract or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026