Vivid vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Vivid | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Figma component generation | 3D scanning / reality capture |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Key Feature | Figma-to-code component generation | AI photogrammetry, LiDAR, floor plans, drone scanning |
| Primary Output | React, Vue, component code | 3D models, floor plans, point clouds |
| Integrations | Figma plugin | None listed (exports to many formats) |
| Latest News Focus | Live face swap / outfit try-on (diverging from core use) | Export tutorials, HDRI lighting, library UI improvements |
Polycam and Vivid are incomparable tools for completely different jobs: Polycam is a professional 3D scanning and reality capture platform, while Vivid is a Figma plugin for generating UI components. Pick Polycam if you need to digitize physical objects, interiors, or drone footage; choose Vivid if you're a frontend developer or designer aiming to automate Figma-to-code handoff. Vivid's latest news (live face swap) suggests a pivot away from its original Figma focus, which may signal instability.

Figma plugin to generate reusable React and Vue components, but its website is down.
Visit Website
Polycam turns phone LiDAR, photos, and drone footage into 3D models, floor plans, and point clouds.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Vivid vs Polycam
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Vivid
No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Aug 26, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Vivid”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.
Polycam
68 mentions across 5 sources · 42% positive — mixed (weighted across 5 sources)
Reddit, Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store
What users praise
- • Produces usable point clouds and meshes from a plain iPhone in a single site visit
- • Genuinely fast — users report scan-to-model turnaround in minutes, not days
- • Broad export coverage: seven mesh formats plus six point cloud formats
- • Fire investigators use it for measurements, 3D models, and Meta Quest walkthrough training
What frustrates them
- • Aggressive trial auto-billing: multiple users report $400/yr charges after 7-day trials
- • Long-standing Pro users report older scans reverting to unprocessable Draft status
- • Measurements and dimensions sit behind an expensive tier above the monthly plan
- • Floor plans described as poor and measurements 'very inaccurate' by paying users
Researched Oct 7, 2026
Who should pick which
- Architect needing on-site floor plansPick: Polycam
Polycam offers automatic floor plan generation with measurements and drag-overlap fix, ideal for quick, accurate documentation.
- Frontend developer using Figma and ReactPick: Vivid
Vivid generates React components directly from Figma, reducing handoff friction. However, recent news suggests a pivot, so evaluate roadmap.
- Forensics team needing 3D scene capturePick: Polycam
Polycam's LiDAR and photogrammetry scans produce high-fidelity 3D models and point clouds usable for analysis.
- Design systems engineerPick: Vivid
Vivid extracts design tokens and variants, syncing with component frameworks. But check active development status.
- Product designer scanning prototypesPick: Polycam
Polycam's AI photogrammetry and beta AI 3D generator convert physical objects to digital models for review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Vivid vs Polycam: which should you choose?
Polycam and Vivid are incomparable tools for completely different jobs: Polycam is a professional 3D scanning and reality capture platform, while Vivid is a Figma plugin for generating UI components. Pick Polycam if you need to digitize physical objects, interiors, or drone footage; choose Vivid if you're a frontend developer or designer aiming to automate Figma-to-code handoff. Vivid's latest news (live face swap) suggests a pivot away from its original Figma focus, which may signal instability.
What is Polycam best for?
Polycam is best for professional 3D scanning of objects, interiors, floor plans, and drone imagery using AI-assisted photogrammetry and LiDAR.
What is Vivid best for?
Vivid is best for generating ready-to-use Figma components (React, Vue) to speed up design-to-development handoff.
Does Polycam have a free tier?
Yes, Polycam offers a free tier with limited scans and exports; paid plans unlock unlimited exports and high quality.
Does Vivid integrate outside Figma?
No, Vivid is a Figma plugin; it exports code for React, Vue, etc., but works only within Figma.
Is Vivid still being developed?
Latest news (July 2026) shows a live face swap demo unrelated to its core Figma features, which may indicate a pivot or reduced focus on component generation.
Can Polycam export point clouds?
Yes, Polycam exports to PLY, LAS, and other point cloud formats, suitable for georeferencing in CloudCompare.
Can Vivid handle design tokens?
Yes, Vivid extracts design tokens from Figma and maps them to component code.
Which tool is better for a solo founder?
It depends: if you need 3D scanning, Polycam's freemium model is accessible; if you need Figma-to-code, Vivid may help, but verify its current state.
More Vivid or Polycam comparisons
Don't cross-shop these. Polycam is a capture tool that turns the physical world — rooms, prototypes, job sites — into 3D models, floor plans, and point clouds you export to SketchUp, Blender, or Unity
These are not competitors and you should never be choosing between them — Polycam is a capture tool that turns a phone, drone, or LiDAR scan into a 3D model, floor plan, or point cloud, and Notion is
These two don't compete — a buyer almost never chooses between them. Polycam is a capture tool: you point a phone, drone or LiDAR at a physical space and get floor plans, meshes and point clouds you c
These two products never meet in a buying decision, and treating them as rivals would mislead you. If your problem is documenting a physical site — rooms, buildings, props, a claims scene — Polycam is
These tools don't compete — they solve unrelated problems, and no buyer shortlists both. If your problem is running open models locally (GLM, Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen3.8) for private agentic work, LM Stud
You are not choosing between these. Polycam and Sketch solve different problems for different people, and no buyer with one budget and one job shortlists both. Pick Polycam if you need to digitise a p
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026