Vivid vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Vivid | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Figma component generation | 3D scanning / reality capture |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Key Feature | Figma-to-code component generation | AI photogrammetry, LiDAR, floor plans, drone scanning |
| Primary Output | React, Vue, component code | 3D models, floor plans, point clouds |
| Integrations | Figma plugin | None listed (exports to many formats) |
| Latest News Focus | Live face swap / outfit try-on (diverging from core use) | Export tutorials, HDRI lighting, library UI improvements |
Polycam and Vivid are incomparable tools for completely different jobs: Polycam is a professional 3D scanning and reality capture platform, while Vivid is a Figma plugin for generating UI components. Pick Polycam if you need to digitize physical objects, interiors, or drone footage; choose Vivid if you're a frontend developer or designer aiming to automate Figma-to-code handoff. Vivid's latest news (live face swap) suggests a pivot away from its original Figma focus, which may signal instability.

AI-powered 3D scanning, floor plans, and reality capture for mobile, drones, and teams.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Vivid vs Polycam
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Vivid
44 mentions across 3 sources · 0% positive — critical
Hacker News, Product Hunt, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Generates ready-to-use components for React, Vue, and other frameworks.
- • Designed to reduce design-to-development handoff friction.
- • Works inside Figma, keeping designers in their existing workflow.
- • Handles design token extraction and variant mapping.
What frustrates them
- • No community feedback or user reviews available.
- • Tool appears to be currently suspended or inactive.
- • Lacks transparent pricing and feature comparisons.
- • Limited integrations documented (none listed).
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Polycam
61 mentions across 4 sources · 55% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store
What users praise
- • Fast, easy LiDAR scans with minimal learning curve.
- • Generates mesh, floor plan, and idealized model from one scan.
- • Cross-platform with iOS, Android, and web support.
- • Free tier includes valuable tools like AI generator and Gaussian splat.
What frustrates them
- • Scan reliability is spotty: failed uploads, lost tracking, backdrop capture.
- • Dimensions and full floor plans locked behind $400 paywall.
- • Curved walls and stairs render angular, forcing Matterport for pros.
- • Confusing free/paid feature split, feels like dark patterns.
Researched Aug 18, 2026
Who should pick which
- Architect needing on-site floor plansPick: Polycam
Polycam offers automatic floor plan generation with measurements and drag-overlap fix, ideal for quick, accurate documentation.
- Frontend developer using Figma and ReactPick: Vivid
Vivid generates React components directly from Figma, reducing handoff friction. However, recent news suggests a pivot, so evaluate roadmap.
- Forensics team needing 3D scene capturePick: Polycam
Polycam's LiDAR and photogrammetry scans produce high-fidelity 3D models and point clouds usable for analysis.
- Design systems engineerPick: Vivid
Vivid extracts design tokens and variants, syncing with component frameworks. But check active development status.
- Product designer scanning prototypesPick: Polycam
Polycam's AI photogrammetry and beta AI 3D generator convert physical objects to digital models for review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Vivid vs Polycam: which should you choose?
Polycam and Vivid are incomparable tools for completely different jobs: Polycam is a professional 3D scanning and reality capture platform, while Vivid is a Figma plugin for generating UI components. Pick Polycam if you need to digitize physical objects, interiors, or drone footage; choose Vivid if you're a frontend developer or designer aiming to automate Figma-to-code handoff. Vivid's latest news (live face swap) suggests a pivot away from its original Figma focus, which may signal instability.
What is Polycam best for?
Polycam is best for professional 3D scanning of objects, interiors, floor plans, and drone imagery using AI-assisted photogrammetry and LiDAR.
What is Vivid best for?
Vivid is best for generating ready-to-use Figma components (React, Vue) to speed up design-to-development handoff.
Does Polycam have a free tier?
Yes, Polycam offers a free tier with limited scans and exports; paid plans unlock unlimited exports and high quality.
Does Vivid integrate outside Figma?
No, Vivid is a Figma plugin; it exports code for React, Vue, etc., but works only within Figma.
Is Vivid still being developed?
Latest news (July 2026) shows a live face swap demo unrelated to its core Figma features, which may indicate a pivot or reduced focus on component generation.
Can Polycam export point clouds?
Yes, Polycam exports to PLY, LAS, and other point cloud formats, suitable for georeferencing in CloudCompare.
Can Vivid handle design tokens?
Yes, Vivid extracts design tokens from Figma and maps them to component code.
Which tool is better for a solo founder?
It depends: if you need 3D scanning, Polycam's freemium model is accessible; if you need Figma-to-code, Vivid may help, but verify its current state.
More Vivid or Polycam comparisons
Polycam and Airtable serve completely different needs: Polycam is a dedicated 3D scanning and reality capture tool for AEC and media professionals, while Airtable is a collaborative database platform
Polycam and Notion serve completely different purposes. Polycam is a specialized 3D scanning tool for professionals needing photogrammetry, floor plans, and drone mapping, while Notion is a general-pu
Polycam and Miro serve entirely different needs: Polycam is a specialized tool for capturing real-world 3D data (scanning, floor plans, drone mapping) while Miro is a broad collaboration platform for
Choosing between LM Studio and Polycam is straightforward: they solve completely different problems. LM Studio is ideal for developers who need private, offline LLM inference on their own hardware, wh
If you need reality capture and 3D scanning for architecture, construction, or forensics, Polycam is the clear choice. For product development teams seeking AI-native issue tracking, triage, and agent
Choose Polycam if you need reality capture—3D scanning objects, interiors, or floor plans for AEC, forensics, or game dev. Choose Sketch if you’re a macOS UI/UX designer who values native performance,
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026
