Weave vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionWeaveScreenplayIQ
PricingFreemium with paid tiers (undisclosed pricing)Free (1 analysis/mo), Pro $19/mo, Studio $49/mo
Target UserEngineering leaders, CTOs, VPs of EngineeringScreenwriters, producers, studio execs
Core FeatureEngineering intelligence with AI attributionAI screenplay analysis & box office prediction
IntegrationsGitHub, GitLab, Jira, Slack, etc.PitchTrailer
Latest NewsWeave Router open-sourced; Isaac 1 robot launchedNo recent news
Best ForEngineering teams using AI coding toolsFeature film marketability assessment

ScreenplayIQ is purpose-built for screenwriters and producers needing data-driven box office forecasts, while Weave targets engineering leaders measuring AI-assisted development. They serve completely different domains, so the choice depends entirely on your role: script analysis vs. engineering productivity. Neither tool overlaps, so pick the one that matches your industry.

Weave
Weave

AI engineering intelligence: measure developer output and AI ROI from prompt to production

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$0
$50/engineer/mo
Custom
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
4 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
Web
WebAPI
Categories
🔎 Code Review & Quality🚦 LLM Gateways & Model Routers
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Attribution of contributions to humans vs AI agents
Output score calibrated to expert benchmarks
AI health, AI impact, AI ROI metrics
Agent observability for Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot
Prompt Router auto-routes to cost-efficient models (DeepSeek V4, GPT-5 Codex, Claude Sonnet 5)
Token intelligence with benchmarking across 1000+ orgs
Wooly AI agent answers natural-language questions (in-app and via MCP)
DORA metrics: deployment frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate
Real-time team tracking dashboards
Code intelligence: output, quality, reviews, turnover
Dev FinOps: engineering cost-to-value analysis
SSO (SAML & OIDC) and SCIM provisioning
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA compliance
Integrations with 50+ AI tools
Prompt Router CLI and SDK (npx @workweave/router, API)
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
GitHub
GitLab
Slack
Jira
Cursor
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
Anthropic
OpenAI
Google
PitchTrailer

Who should pick which

  • Screenwriter seeking market feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Provides AI structural analysis and box office prediction, directly helping writers gauge commercial potential of their feature scripts.

  • Producer evaluating script slate
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Comparative market data and performance predictions assist producers in selecting scripts with higher ROI potential.

  • CTO of tech organization adopting AI coding tools
    Pick: Weave

    Weave offers AI attribution, DORA metrics, and agent observability to measure productivity and ROI from AI-assisted development.

  • Engineering team using multiple AI coding agents
    Pick: Weave

    Agent observability for Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot gives unified visibility into AI contributions alongside human work.

  • Hobbyist writer on a budget
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Free tier provides 1 analysis per month, enough for occasional feedback without cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

Weave vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

ScreenplayIQ is purpose-built for screenwriters and producers needing data-driven box office forecasts, while Weave targets engineering leaders measuring AI-assisted development. They serve completely different domains, so the choice depends entirely on your role: script analysis vs. engineering productivity. Neither tool overlaps, so pick the one that matches your industry.

Can ScreenplayIQ analyze TV scripts or short films?

No, it only supports feature-length English screenplays; TV and short films are not supported.

Does Weave provide grammar or style checks for code?

Weave focuses on engineering metrics and AI attribution, not code quality checks; use linters for that.

What integrations does ScreenplayIQ offer besides PitchTrailer?

ScreenplayIQ only integrates with PitchTrailer for pitch deck generation; no other integrations are listed.

Is Weave suitable for small teams not using AI coding tools?

Weave is best for teams with 5+ engineers already using AI coding tools; small teams without AI use may not benefit.

Does ScreenplayIQ have an API?

Yes, API access is available on the Studio plan ($49/mo) for custom integrations.

What recent updates have happened for Weave?

In 2026, Weave open-sourced Weave Router for smart model routing and launched Isaac 1, a $7,999 home robot (unrelated to platform).

Can Weave track individual developer productivity?

Yes, Weave provides PR drill-down with individual and team stats, plus role-based permissions.

Is there a free trial for ScreenplayIQ?

Yes, the Free tier includes 1 analysis per month, effectively a free trial.

More Weave or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026