Subscription · $49 per month

AI Visibility Report

AI visibility tracking for your tool, $49 a month: twice a week we ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity the questions your buyers actually type, and tell you whether they named you — who they recommended instead, and whether you are gaining or slipping. Cancel any time. The report observes what the engines say; it never changes anything about how your tool is listed here.

Tools tracked

8,220

Every one re-checked on a running cycle

Re-verified this week

59%

Not a month — this week

AI assistants sending visitors

ChatGPTPerplexityClaudeGemini

Real referrals, named — not a vanity count

Drop your link — we do the rest.

  • We fetch your product’s details from your link and build your listing — nothing else needed from you.
  • Every week we ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity ten questions your buyers actually type.
  • You learn whether YOU were named — and exactly which competitors were recommended instead.
  • We derive your real competitor set from your category automatically; nothing to configure.
  • The history is kept, so you see movement — gaining or slipping — not a one-day snapshot.
  • Your listing is tracked and re-verified continuously alongside. Cancel any time.

$49per month

The payment window shows $49 USD per month. Your card is charged in US dollars; your bank statement shows the converted amount.

Nothing you see is for sale — paying never changes your listing, score or ranking. Cancel any time.

The question this answers

The thing that keeps an AI-tool founder up in 2026 is no longer whether they rank on Google. It is this: when a buyer asks an assistant for the best tools in my category, is my name in the answer, or is my competitor's?

It is a hard question to answer alone. One person asking ChatGPT once gets one sample, on one day, phrased one way — and the answer varies by phrasing more than most founders expect. What you need is the same battery of questions asked repeatedly over time, and that is tedious enough that nobody does it by hand for long.

What we ask

Ten questions per cycle, built from your tool's category, phrased the way a buyer would phrase them rather than the way a marketer would. The templates include:

  • What are the best {category} tools in 2026?
  • Which {category} tool would you recommend, and why?
  • What are the top alternatives to consider for {category}?
  • Which {category} tools are best for a small startup team on a budget?
  • What is the best value-for-money {category} tool right now?

Each goes to Gemini, Perplexity and ChatGPT with web search enabled, every week. We record whether your tool was named, where it appeared relative to the others, which competitors were named instead, and which sources the engine leaned on.

What arrives in your inbox

  1. Per engine. Named or not, at what position, and how that moved since the last report.
  2. Who is recommended instead. The competitors the engines actually name in your category — usually the most uncomfortable and most useful section.
  3. Your listing here. Views, outbound clicks, saves, and how often our stack planner recommended you. Bot-filtered, seven-day window, shown in context rather than dressed up.
  4. What we re-verified. The specific fields our pipelines changed on your listing this week — proof the data behind you is alive.
  5. Sentiment pulse. What people are saying, when there is enough signal to say anything honest.

What you get for the price

Tools that monitor brand visibility in AI answers generally start around $99/month for a single engine, and the ones aimed at enterprises run into the hundreds. We watch a product we already maintain verified data about — three engines, your real competitor set, no configuration — and we price it where an indie founder can say yes without a meeting.

There is also something here the general-purpose trackers structurally cannot offer. They watch a brand. We watch a product we already maintain data about— which means we know your category, we can derive your real competitor set without asking you to type one in, and we can show you what changed on your listing alongside what changed in the answers.

What your $49 can’t buy — on purpose

Subscribing does not move you up anything. Not our rankings, not our scores, not our recommendations, not a “best of” list. The report tells you what the AI engines are saying and suggests what you could change about your own presence — better docs, coverage on the sources those engines trust, an answer to that Reddit thread. It never promises that our behaviour will change, because it will not.

“Paid and free are treated identically in all rankings and recommendations.”

AI Visibility Report — $49/month

Not listed with us yet? That’s fine — subscribe and we build your listing from your link. Nothing else is needed from you.

Subscribe — $49/mo →

Cancel any time; cancellation takes effect at the end of the paid billing cycle. Prefer a one-off? The Deep Report is $99 once — the full audit, plus a free second run a week later.

Questions

How is this different from checking ChatGPT myself?▾
You can ask once. We ask ten different buyer questions across three engines, every week, and keep the history — so you see movement rather than a single moment. A one-off check also cannot tell you whether being absent this Tuesday is normal or new, which is the only version of the question that leads to a decision.
Which AI engines do you check?▾
Gemini, Perplexity and ChatGPT in the base subscription. Claude is available as a paid add-on, because its web-search pricing is roughly ten times the others — including it in the base price would cost more per tool than the subscription itself. We would rather charge for it separately than quietly thin out everything else to absorb it.
Does subscribing change how my tool is ranked here?▾
No. The report observes; it never intervenes. Your tool is ranked, described and scored identically whether you subscribe or not, and nobody on the editorial side can see who is subscribed. The report can recommend actions to you — improve your docs, get reviewed on other platforms — but it never promises that our behaviour will change, because it will not.
Where does the citation data come from — does it depend on your traffic?▾
The core of the report — which assistants name you, and who they recommend instead — is completely independent of our traffic: that data comes from Gemini, Perplexity and ChatGPT, not from us, and it works exactly the same whether we get twenty visitors a day or twenty thousand. Your listing analytics ride alongside it as a bonus, shown in context; the citation intelligence is the part you are paying for, and it stands entirely on its own.
Is there a way to try it without subscribing?▾
Buy the one-time Deep Report: the same analysis run deeper, once, with a free second run seven days later. Paid RAC Verified submissions also receive a one-run "How AI sees you" snapshot at launch, which is a single-page preview of what this report tracks every week — and the report can be added to a RAC Verified order on the submit page.
Can I cancel?▾
Any time, in one click, and it takes effect at the end of the cycle you have already paid for — you keep receiving reports until then. We do not do retention mazes. If you would rather pause than cancel, that option is there too.
What if I just want to know once?▾
Buy the one-time Deep Report instead. It covers the same ground more deeply, arrives within 24 hours, and includes a free second run seven days later so you still see one cycle of movement.

Related: all pricing · Deep Report · RAC Verified · how we evaluate tools