Deep Report

The section that justifies the price

Every AI-visibility product on the market can tell you that you were mentioned two times out of fifteen. None of them answer the question you actually have next: why them and not me?

When an assistant answers a buyer's question, it both cites sources and reads sources, and we record both. So the Deep Report can say something concrete: when Perplexity recommended a competitor for “best presentation tools”, it leaned on a G2 listing, a Reddit thread in r/SaaS, and a TechCrunch article — and you appear on none of the three. That is not a diagnosis, it is a to-do list, and it is the part founders tell us they cannot get anywhere else.

What you get

1. The verdict, first. Cited or not, per engine, with your position among the tools that were named. No preamble.
2. Who is recommended instead, ordered by how often each competitor appears.
3. The source gap — the sites each engine trusted, and which of them you are missing from.
4. Your listing here, in context and bot-filtered.
5. What we verified on your listing, field by field.
6. An ordered action list— specific things to change about your own site and presence. Never “buy something else from us”.

Two deliberate design choices

It arrives as a private page, not a PDF. An unlisted, unguessable link you can forward to a co-founder or an investor. PDFs get downloaded once and lost in a folder; a link gets read by three people and comes up in a meeting. It exports to PDF if you need one, but the page is the product.

You get a second one, free, seven days later. A single snapshot cannot tell you whether being absent is normal or new, which is the only version of the question worth acting on. So we run the identical sweep again a week after the first and send you what moved. It costs us very little and it turns a receipt into something alive.

Where it sits

At the cheap end of this market there are $9 one-shot audits that ask a single question and format the answer nicely. At the other end, brand-monitoring platforms start near $99 a month and enterprise analytics runs into tens of thousands a year. This sits deliberately in between: roughly the price of one month of the cheapest serious tracker, buying something none of them sell.

And if you decide you want to watch it over time rather than know it once, the AI Visibility Report ($49/month) runs this same analysis twice a week. We would rather you subscribe than buy this twice.

What a report looks like

A sample, with demo data for an imaginary tool. Yours has the same three parts, built from your real category and competitors.

No score. Receipts.

Most AI-visibility products hand you a proprietary score and ask you to trust it. This report contains no score at all: it shows the assistants’ actual answers to each question, verbatim, and the actual sources each one cited. Every claim in it can be checked by asking the same assistant the same question yourself — and we would rather you did. A number you cannot verify is marketing; an answer you can re-run is evidence.

What it does not do

It does not change anything about your listing here — not your ranking, not your score, not our verdict. It reports on what the AI engines say and recommends what you could change about your own presence. Buying one has no effect whatsoever on how your tool is treated in our catalogue, and that is not a limitation we are apologising for; it is the reason our catalogue is worth appearing in.

“Paid and free are treated identically in all rankings and recommendations.”