Adam

Adam

AI CAD copilot that makes editing, BOM cleanup, sourcing and RFQ work show up as finished artifacts, not suggestions.

77/100Safe BetFree · from $40/moFreemium

Adam is one of the few AI CAD tools that hands back a branched model edit instead of a paragraph of advice, and the Fusion SOLID-tab button plus streaming follow-ups make it feel less like a chat window bolted onto CAD. Onshape assembly mate editing, Rhino 8 as a built-in connector and GPT-6-Astra in the catalog are real 2026 progress. The catch is stack dependency — if you're not on Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks or Rhino with a PLM like Arena to match, there is little here for you. Pilot it on a BOM cleanup or a supplier comparison before you let it near a released drawing. If your work is PCB or EDA, look elsewhere.

Verified 3d ago · liveness 77/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/adam

Best for
  • Mechanical design engineers automating repetitive CAD edits, drawing updates, and BOM cleanup
  • Hardware startups that need sourcing, RFQs, and ECOs handled without adding headcount
  • Engineering managers assembling design review briefs and tracking build blockers by owner and date
  • Manufacturing engineers packaging factory handoffs with drawings, BOM, and a QA checklist
Not ideal for
  • Teams whose CAD lives outside the supported stack — Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks, and Rhino are the connected systems
  • PCB or electronic design automation work, which falls outside what Adam is built for
  • Shops with no CAD or PLM system for Adam to read geometry, BOMs, and revisions from
Visit Website

IntermediateSolo engineer: connect Onshape or Fusion and you can send a first task in about 10-15 minutes; the Free tier's guided setup walks you through Codex configuration before the CAD connection prompt. Small team: allow an hour or two to connect CAD, PLM (Arena), Slack and Drive, since Adam reads geometry, BOMs and revisions from each connected system before the first useful BOM or RFQ run. DesktopWeb · PluginAPI availableVerified 3d ago
Pricing
Free · from $40/mo
FreemiumFree tier4 plans4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Solo engineer: connect Onshape or Fusion and you can send a first task in about 10-15 minutes; the Free tier's guided setup walks you through Codex configuration before the CAD connection prompt. Small team: allow an hour or two to connect CAD, PLM (Arena), Slack and Drive, since Adam reads geometry, BOMs and revisions from each connected system before the first useful BOM or RFQ run. Desktop
Runs on
WebPlugin
API available · 15 integrations
Who it's for
Mechanical design engineer at a hardware startupSupply chain leadEngineering manager preparing a design review
Live sentiment
Is Adam actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Adam if your CAD isn't Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks, or Rhino — or if your work is PCB/EDA rather than mechanical — because the whole product depends on reading geometry, BOMs, and revisions from a connected, supported stack.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Free and Starter tiers carry usage ceilings, so heavy design weeks can push you toward the $200/mo Pro tier faster than the price list suggests.

Price reality

Adam's published ladder runs $0/mo Free, $40/mo Starter for one engineer, $200/mo Pro for active design work, and $1,000/mo Max for the top individual tier — so it's priced for a professional mechanical engineer rather than a prosumer. Solo engineers should start at Starter; small hardware teams comparing per-seat cost against a dedicated sourcing or drafting hire will find Pro reasonable, while Max is only worth it if your CAD and sourcing volume is genuinely heavy.

In short

Adam — AI CAD copilot that makes editing, BOM cleanup, sourcing and RFQ work show up as finished artifacts, not suggestions. Best for Mechanical design engineers automating repetitive CAD edits, drawing updates, and BOM cleanup, Hardware startups that need sourcing, RFQs, and ECOs handled without adding headcount, Engineering managers assembling design review briefs and tracking build blockers by owner and date. Free to start; paid plans from $40/mo.

What's new in Adam

Checked 3 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 4 feature updates and 1 changelog entry.

What people actually say about Adam — is it worth it?

We scanned public community sources for Adam on Aug 19, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.

Viability Score

77/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Adam? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
10
What the vendor publishes
60

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Natural-language CAD editing (thicken, draft, fillet, shell) via Slack, email, or in-CAD palettes
  • Model edits that respect the feature tree and flag parent-child breaks instead of forcing a rebuild
  • Onshape assembly mate and relation creation, including suppressing and unsuppressing mates
  • BOM reconciliation against released revisions with part-number and rev mismatch flags
  • Duplicate part-number consolidation with suggested standard replacements
  • Drawing detailing with GD&T callouts, H7 fits, datums, and ISO 2768-mK tolerances
  • RFQ drafting with tolerances, finish, quantity breaks, and target delivery, plus attached STEP and DXF
  • Supplier comparison by cost drivers, lead time, risk, and stock across distributor catalogs
  • Pin-compatible component alternate finding with firmware and supply-chain tradeoffs
  • ECO packet creation from revision notes with affected parts, risks, and approvals
  • CMF direction staging with pantone specs and renders tracking the latest geometry
  • Photoreal hero renders and exploded views with leader callouts
  • Collision-resolved exploded assembly view with a Spread slider in the CAD viewer
  • Design review brief generation pulling build notes, open issues, and CAD screenshots
  • Password-protected share links with friendly passcodes, plus dictation alongside typing

About Adam

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · Plugin

Adam is an AI CAD copilot for hardware teams, backed by Y Combinator. Instead of exporting a STEP file to ask a chatbot a question, you connect Onshape, Autodesk Fusion, SolidWorks, Arena PLM and supplier catalogs — plus 3,000 more tools including Google Drive, Jira, Linear, Notion, Airtable, Slack and Gmail — and Adam reads your geometry, BOMs, drawings and revisions into one connected graph. You message it from Slack, email, or the palette inside Onshape and Fusion (there is now a dedicated Adam button on Fusion's SOLID tab; Rhino 8 is a built-in desktop connector preset as of September 2026). What comes back is the finished artifact: a branched model edit that respects the feature tree and flags parent-child breaks, a reconciled BOM with rev mismatches and duplicate part numbers consolidated, a detail drawing with H7 fits and ISO 2768-mK title-block tolerances, a supplier comparison, an ECO packet, or a factory handoff folder. Recent releases added Onshape assembly mate creation and suppression, GPT-6-Astra to the connector catalog, Codex-guided setup, live streaming of follow-up messages, password-protected share links with friendly passcodes, dictation alongside typing, faster STEP viewer preloading, and browser notifications when a task finishes. Mechanical design engineers, hardware startups and supply chain teams are the core audience; industrial designers get pinched fillets rebuilt as curvature-continuous blends. Where Adam differs from a generic assistant is that it works through your CAD file on your connected stack rather than handing you advice.

Behind the Verdict

Adam's core bet is that hardware engineers don't want another chat box — they want the artifact. Every worked example on its site ends in something you can hand off: a boss wall thinned to 1.6 mm with a gusset rib and 1.0° draft toward the A-side with the drawing dims updated to match; a 47-line-item BOM with six WIP revs flagged, a gasket referencing rev B against a released rev C, two duplicate screws consolidated to a McMaster part number, released items pushed to Arena; a baseplate drawing with H7 fits, Ø0.05 true position on the dowel bores and an over-constrained dimension chain rebased from datum B; an RFQ to two sheet-metal shops with rev C STEP, flat-pattern DXF, 5052-H32 at 2.0 mm, 8 bends and clear chromate per MIL-DTL-5541 Type II Class 3 — with your target price deliberately left out so you don't anchor the shops. That specificity is the product's selling point and, from the scrape, it's backed by real workflow plumbing rather than prompt gymnastics. The 2026 changelog is where the substantive engineering shows. Adam can now create and edit assembly mates and relations inside Onshape, including suppressing and unsuppressing mates; the connector catalog picked up GPT-6-Astra; model choices are organized into Lite, Pro and Ultra families with live model names and reasoning-effort controls; Rhino 8 landed as a built-in desktop connector preset with its plug-in and MCP server bundled. There is an MCP layer and a beta API, which matters if you want Adam inside your own tooling rather than only inside its UI. Browser notifications when a task finishes, toasts when a chat is waiting on an approval, and streaming follow-up messages during a run all address the practical problem with long-running CAD agents — you can't babysit a tab. Strengths: it edits rather than advises; it works on your connected stack with no exported copies of your IP; the integrations list covers the real hardware toolchain (Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks, Arena, McMaster-Carr, Digi-Key, Xometry, Google Drive, Google Sheets, Jira, Linear, Notion, Airtable, Slack, Gmail); and renders, CMF direction with pantone codes, and vendor email drafting are bundled rather than bolted on as separate subscriptions. Weaknesses and honest limits: stack dependency is the big one. Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks and now Rhino cover a lot of mechanical work but not all of it, and PLM support leans on Arena. PCB and EDA work is out of scope. Pure 2D drafting with no 3D geometry has nothing for Adam to work against. Some workflows still require you to accept changes inside the connected CAD application, and while oversized attachments are auto-sized so they don't break a turn, extremely large uploads remain a risk. Nothing in the scrape documents on-prem or offline operation — this is a cloud product and the docs assume an internet connection. Where it fits: a mechanical engineer who spends Friday afternoons on BOM cleanup, drawing dims and RFQ emails. A hardware startup that needs sourcing

Researching Adam? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Adam actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Mechanical design engineer at a hardware startup

The M3 boss keeps sinking on the molded part. Connect Onshape and message Adam from Slack asking it to thicken the boss and add draft.

Outcome: Adam thins the boss wall to 1.6 mm, ties it to the floor with a gusset rib, adds a 0.5 mm root fillet and 1.0° draft toward the A-side as a branched model edit you approve, with the drawing dims updated to match.

Supply chain lead

The Omron limit switch on the v3 goes end-of-life and you need a drop-in replacement before the next build.

Outcome: Adam browses Digi-Key, Mouser and Newark, finds the Panasonic AVL3 matching the 6.5 N force and footprint in stock at $0.62 for 250 qty, and logs the top three options in a Google Sheet.

Engineering manager preparing a design review

You need a design review brief for tomorrow with build notes, open issues and CAD screenshots pulled together.

Outcome: Adam assembles the brief from your bring-up channel and CAD, turning blockers into owners, next steps and dates, and notifies you in the browser when the task finishes.

Use Cases

  • Thicken a sinking molded boss, add a gusset rib, fillet and draft from one Slack message, with drawing dims updated to match.
  • Build a complete BOM for a v3 assembly, fill missing MPNs, and flag line items still on WIP revisions.
  • Reconcile a gasket referencing rev B against a released rev C and push the released items to Arena.
  • Draft an RFQ for an anodized aluminum enclosure with tolerances, finish, quantity breaks, and lead time.
  • Detail a machined baseplate drawing with H7 fits, Ø0.05 true position on dowel bores, and ISO 2768-mK tolerances.
  • Create an ECO packet from revision notes with affected parts, risks, and supplier instructions.
  • Compare three suppliers for a custom part across cost drivers, lead times, and risk.
  • Find pin-compatible alternatives for a backordered MCU and explain the firmware tradeoffs.

Models Under the Hood

GPT-6-Astra

as of 2026-09-28

Limitations

  • Adam requires connecting to supported CAD tools (Onshape, Autodesk Fusion, SolidWorks, Rhino) and PLM systems such as Arena, plus an internet connection.
  • It cannot work directly on unsupported CAD formats without a desktop connector, and some workflows still require you to accept changes in your connected CAD application.
  • Larger attachments are auto-sized so a big image or PDF doesn't fail the message it was sent with, but extremely large uploads may still be problematic.
  • PCB and EDA work sits outside the product.
  • Nothing in the documentation describes on-prem, offline, or desktop-only CAD editing.

as of 2026-10-05

Verification history

We have re-verified Adam 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Adam tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

A single engineer who wants to try Adam on a real CAD or BOM task before paying anything

What this tier adds

Free entry point: connect supported CAD, PLM, and supplier catalogs, and message Adam from Slack, email, or the in-CAD palettes.

Starter

$40/mo

Ideal for

One engineer doing regular design work who needs model edits, BOM reconciliation, and RFQ drafting

What this tier adds

Adds natural-language model edits, BOM reconciliation, RFQ drafting, render generation, and supplier comparison on top of the free tier.

Pro

$200/mo

Ideal for

An active design engineer or small team whose weekly CAD, drawing, and sourcing volume outgrows Starter

What this tier adds

Raises the usage ceiling and unlocks full geometry, BOM, drawing, and sourcing workflows plus design review briefs, ECO packets, and factory handoff packaging.

Max

$1,000/mo

Ideal for

A heavy individual user running constant CAD edits, sourcing research, and render generation

What this tier adds

Top individual tier: all Adam skills across geometry, BOMs, docs, vendors, and renders, plus password-protected share links and priority access to newer capabilities.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Free and Starter tiers carry usage ceilings, so heavy design weeks can push you toward the $200/mo Pro tier faster than the price list suggests.
  • Shared add-on funds sit at the team level even though assigned-seat usage follows each member's own plan, so one busy engineer can drain a shared pool.
  • Running models at the Fast setting bills at the Fast rate — Adam shipped a fix so requests can no longer silently run standard-speed while billing at that premium, but the premium itself still applies.
  • Per-seat pricing means a design team of five on Pro lands at $1,000/mo before any add-ons, which is a real step from the $40/mo single-engineer Starter tier.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Adam's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Adam's published ladder runs $0/mo Free, $40/mo Starter for one engineer, $200/mo Pro for active design work, and $1,000/mo Max for the top individual tier — so it's priced for a professional mechanical engineer rather than a prosumer. Solo engineers should start at Starter; small hardware teams comparing per-seat cost against a dedicated sourcing or drafting hire will find Pro reasonable, while Max is only worth it if your CAD and sourcing volume is genuinely heavy.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Adam — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Solo engineer: connect Onshape or Fusion and you can send a first task in about 10-15 minutes; the Free tier's guided setup walks you through Codex configuration before the CAD connection prompt. Small team: allow an hour or two to connect CAD, PLM (Arena), Slack and Drive, since Adam reads geometry, BOMs and revisions from each connected system before the first useful BOM or RFQ run. Desktop

Switching to or from Adam

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From manual CAD work: connect Onshape, Fusion, SolidWorks, or Rhino and start with a single BOM cleanup before handing Adam model edits.
  • →From Arena-record-only workflows: connect Arena PLM so Adam reads items, BOMs, suppliers, files, and changes rather than just writing to them.
  • →From Google Sheets BOMs: point Adam at the sheet and the connected CAD so it can reconcile line items against released revisions.
  • →From spreadsheet-based RFQ drafting: connect Gmail so Adam can stage quote requests in your drafts with STEP and DXF attached.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a generic AI assistant: you lose feature-tree-aware model edits and would export STEP files to ask questions instead.
  • ↗To manual CAD editing: BOM reconciliation, duplicate part-number consolidation, and rev mismatch flagging become hand work again.
  • ↗To a point solution for renders only: you keep hero shots and exploded views but give up the connected BOM, drawing, and sourcing graph.

Integrations

OnshapeAutodesk FusionSolidWorksRhinoArenaMcMaster-CarrDigi-KeyMouserNewarkXometryGoogle DriveGoogle SheetsJiraLinearNotion

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Adam”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Adam” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Adam.

Tools that pair well with Adam

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Adam, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Adam

View all
Finch 3D

Finch 3D

AI-native floor plan generation for architects, planners, and AEC teams

FreemiumTry
Fusion 360

Fusion 360

Autodesk Fusion unifies 3D CAD, CAM, CAE, and PCB design in one cloud workspace for product teams

FreemiumTry
mnml AI

mnml AI

mnml AI turns sketches, photos and SketchUp, Revit or Rhino views into photoreal architectural renders with a guided Studio workspace and a collaborative Flow

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Adam? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.