ADE is live · free · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability healthy
ADE
ADE runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other AI coding agents side by side in one synced agentic development environment
ADE earns its disk space the moment you're paying for two coding agents and tired of alt-tabbing between them. Lane-per-worktree isolation plus stacked PR review turns parallel runs into something you can audit, and v1.2.128's cross-machine commands and shared sign-ins make a multi-device setup feel like one box. Single-agent, single-machine developers will find the orchestration mostly ceremony.
Verdict generatedVerified 23d ago · liveness 72/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/ade
- Developers already paying for two or more AI coding agents who want one workspace
- Indie developers moving between a Mac, a PC, a phone and a server
- Small teams that want agent PRs reviewed, checked and merged without leaving the app
- Developers running parallel agent tasks who need worktree isolation and stacked branches
- Developers running one agent on one machine — the orchestration buys little
- Windows-only shops unwilling to run a beta build as their daily driver
- Teams needing the full GUI on Linux desktops, where ADE ships as a headless runtime
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip ADE if you run a single agent on a single machine — the worktree-per-task lane model only pays off once you're juggling two or more agents, and a Windows-only shop would be on the beta build.
ADE itself is open source and free, so the real bill is your agent subscriptions — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the rest are billed by their own vendors on top.
ADE is open source and free to install on macOS, with the runtime also distributed for Windows beta, headless Linux and iOS. That makes it the cheap layer: your spend sits in the agent subscriptions it orchestrates. Compared with a single-agent IDE subscription, ADE adds no seat cost of its own but assumes you're already paying two or more vendors — teams consolidating to one agent get little value from the orchestration layer.
In short
ADE — ADE runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other AI coding agents side by side in one synced agentic development environment. Best for Developers already paying for two or more AI coding agents who want one workspace, Indie developers moving between a Mac, a PC, a phone and a server, Small teams that want agent PRs reviewed, checked and merged without leaving the app. Free to use.
What is ADE?
ADE — ADE runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other AI coding agents side by side in one synced agentic development environment. Best for Developers already paying for two or more AI coding agents who want one workspace, Indie developers moving between a Mac, a PC, a phone and a server, Small teams that want agent PRs reviewed, checked and merged without leaving the app. Free to use.
ADE is a free, open-source agentic development environment for developers who already juggle more than one AI coding agent. Rather than crowning a single harness, it puts Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode and Factory Droid behind one picker, paired with a source and model per task across 200+ model providers. The unit of work is the lane: every task gets its own git worktree with its own chats, commits and changes, so parallel agent runs stay isolated. From there you stack pull requests, review checks and merge in order without leaving the app, and PR watch can wake an agent when a new review or failed check lands. A grid view tiles many chats when you want to watch the whole fleet at once. The same conversation follows you across desktop, the web app, the terminal via ade code, and the iPhone app. A headless brain option lets ADE run on a screenless server joined to your other machines. Verification tooling rounds it out: simulators and a private Mac desktop for Apple work, a private Windows desktop, an in-app browser carrying your sign-ins for screenshots and element picking, and video proof filed alongside each chat. Around the core sit a full file editor, history graph, Linear/Jira/GitHub issues, spend tracking, scheduled automations and chat import. Version 1.2.128 pushes the setup across machines: run commands and simulators on your other computers, use every harness on existing sign-ins, and handle restarts through one dialog across all machines. It suits indie developers bouncing between a Mac, a PC, a phone and a server, and small teams that want agent PRs reviewed and merged in one place. Where Cursor and GitHub's agent surfaces want to be your only agent, ADE assumes you run several and gives them shared ground — you bring your own subscriptions and models.
Key features
- Run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode and Factory Droid from one picker
- Pair any harness with any source and model across 200+ model providers
- Give every task its own git worktree lane with isolated chats and commits
- Stack PRs on top of each other and merge in order
- Review PR checks, comments and merge inside ADE without opening GitHub
- Wake an agent on new reviews or failed checks with PR watch
- Trigger agents on a schedule or from PRs, issues and webhooks with automations
- Sync the same chats across desktop, web app, terminal and iPhone
- Drive chats, lanes and PRs from the shell with ade code
- Run ADE headless on a Linux server that joins your other machines
- Run commands and simulators on your other computers (v1.2.128)
- Use every harness on existing sign-ins (v1.2.128)
- Handle restarts via one dialog across all machines (v1.2.128)
- Open side chats and subagent chats in the actions pane
- Live voice narration plus dictate and talk to an agent out loud
Behind the verdict
Most AI coding tools ask you to commit: one harness, one editor, one vendor's idea of how agents should work. ADE takes the opposite bet. It assumes you already pay for Claude Code and maybe Codex too, and it spends its effort making them coexist rather than replacing them. That framing is either exactly what you need or a lot of scaffolding you'll ignore. Pick ADE when parallel agent work is your daily reality. The lane model — a git worktree per task with its own chats, commits and changes — is the part that matters. Without it, running three agents at once turns into a merge-conflict lottery. Stacked PRs and in-app check review close the loop, so you're not bouncing to GitHub for every failed build. The v1.2.128 release is the one that makes a multi-machine setup coherent. Running commands and simulators on your other computers, using every harness on existing sign-ins, and restarting everything from one dialog all point at the same idea: your laptop, desktop and headless Linux box behave like one workspace. If you split time between a Mac and a PC, or keep a server running agents overnight, that's a real quality-of-life gain. Where it bites: ADE does not include agent subscriptions. You bring your own plans and models, so the $0 price tag is the floor, not the bill. Windows-only teams should weigh running a beta build as their daily driver, and Linux desktop users get a headless runtime rather than the full GUI — fine for a server, not a replacement for your editor if you want the interface locally. If you run one agent on one machine, skip it. The orchestration buys you little and adds concepts — lanes, pickers, stacked PRs — you'd have to learn for no payoff. The same goes for developers who want a single agent plus editor. ADE is a floor for a fleet, not a
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-02
Limitations
- ADE runs natively on macOS 13+ and Windows 10/11 x64; on Linux it runs headless and is driven from a Mac, phone, or the web.
- The iOS companion installs through TestFlight rather than the App Store.
- Every task gets its own git worktree lane, so workflows that don't fit a branch-per-task model may not get the parallelism benefit.
- Bringing in third-party agents still requires connecting each agent's own provider and credentials.
as of 2026-10-17
Researching ADE? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is ADE still active?
ADE is live · free · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is ADE? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What's new in ADE
Checked 8 days agoAcross the latest 1 update: 1 changelog entry.
What do users say about ADE?
What people actually say about ADE — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 26, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about ADE — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 22 Oct 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified ADE 13 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed pricing tiers, summary, our verdict, description
- — changed description, features, summary, pricing tiers, our verdict
- — changed description, our verdict, pricing tiers
- — changed description, summary, our verdict, pricing tiers, platforms, pricing page, limitations, models
- — changed pricing tiers, who should skip it, description, features, who it suits, summary, our verdict, integrations
- — changed limitations, pricing page
Showing the 6 most recent of 13 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does ADE cost in 2026?
ADE: Free to use. Pricing last verified 22 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published ADE tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Indie developers and small teams already paying for two or more AI coding agents who want one workspace across Mac, Windows beta, Linux headless and iOS.Adds: Free entry point — the app, iOS companion, terminal client and unlimited lanes at no charge; agent subscriptions are billed separately by their vendors. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where ADE's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
ADE is open source and free to install on macOS, with the runtime also distributed for Windows beta, headless Linux and iOS. That makes it the cheap layer: your spend sits in the agent subscriptions it orchestrates. Compared with a single-agent IDE subscription, ADE adds no seat cost of its own but assumes you're already paying two or more vendors — teams consolidating to one agent get little value from the orchestration layer.
Has ADE's pricing changed?
No plan price for ADE has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick ADE?
Pick ADE if you are Developers already paying for two or more AI coding agents who want one workspace, Indie developers moving between a Mac, a PC, a phone and a server, Small teams that want agent PRs reviewed, checked and merged without leaving the app, Developers running parallel agent tasks who need worktree isolation and stacked branches.
Look elsewhere if you are Developers running one agent on one machine — the orchestration buys little, Windows-only shops unwilling to run a beta build as their daily driver, Teams needing the full GUI on Linux desktops, where ADE ships as a headless runtime, Anyone expecting ADE to include agent subscriptions — you bring your own plans and models.
Skip it if Skip ADE if you run a single agent on a single machine — the worktree-per-task lane model only pays off once you're juggling two or more agents, and a Windows-only shop would be on the beta build.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas ADE actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Open the repo in ADE, create a lane for a narrow change, then create a second lane for a refactor. Launch Claude Code in one and Codex in the other, tile both in grid view, and approve diffs as they land without stashing anything.
Outcome: Two agents work side by side on isolated worktrees with no file collisions, and each finished chat turns into a PR with CI status and a merge button inside ADE.
Point ADE at a headless Linux server as the runtime, start a long agent task from the Mac desktop app, then check messages, tool calls and proof artifacts on the iOS companion from the road and approve the diff there.
Outcome: Session continuity across surfaces — the same lanes and chats follow you from desktop to phone, so a run doesn't stall while you're away from the keyboard.
Pull a Linear issue into ADE, hand the plan to a lead agent that dispatches subagents, track each worker in grid view, then review the resulting PR with CI checks and set auto-merge when green.
Outcome: The issue-to-PR loop stays in one app — no GitHub tab, no copy-paste between Linear and the editor, and each PR is linked back to the issue that asked for it.
Use cases
- Run several coding agents in parallel on one repo without file collisions, each in its own lane with its own worktree
- Start an agent task on a Mac, approve the diff from an iPhone, finish in the terminal
- Turn a finished agent chat into a pull request with diff, CI checks and merge without opening GitHub
- Set up a headless Linux server as the agent runtime and drive it from a laptop, phone or the web
- Hand one lead agent a plan and track each dispatched worker live in grid view
- Do web QA and element inspection in the built-in browser next to the chat the agent is working from
- Pull Linear issues into the same app, move them through states and link the PRs that resolve them
- Embed a slim ADE runtime in your own product as a sidecar and present agent chat as durable named threads
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of ADE — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Installs with a single shell command on macOS and Linux or a PowerShell line on Windows. Budget roughly 10–15 minutes for a first run: install, connect an AI provider, open a repository, create one lane and run one narrow agent task — the docs recommend starting with one lane, one agent and one review pass. Standing up a headless Linux remote runtime to drive from a Mac or phone is an afternoon
Switching to or from ADE
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a bare terminal: install ADE, open the same repository and create a lane — ADE creates local project state under .ade/ and leaves your source tree under Git's control.
- →From Cursor's agent mode: keep Cursor installed, configure it as an agent in ADE and run it against ADE lanes instead of the Cursor editor's own workspace.
- →From GitHub's web PR flow: connect GitHub in ADE so agent-opened PRs land inside the app with diff, CI and merge controls.
- →From Linear issue tracking: connect Linear in ADE to pull issues, move them through states and link the PRs that resolve them.
- ↗To Cursor alone: commit and push from ADE's PR view, then continue in Cursor's editor with your lanes collapsed back into branches.
- ↗To plain git and a shell: every lane is a standard git worktree, so you can archive lanes and keep working from the branches with ordinary git commands.
- ↗To GitHub's native agent surfaces: keep your PRs on GitHub — ADE opens them there — and hand future agent runs to GitHub's own tooling.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “ADE”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “ADE” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about ADE.
Official links
What are the best ADE alternatives?
The closest alternatives to ADE we list are Spec-Driven-Development, Ui Ux Pro Max Skill and Cursor. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spec-Driven-Development | Free | Free | — |
| Ui Ux Pro Max Skill | Free | Free | — |
| Cursor | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to ADE
View all
Spec-Driven-Development
Spec-driven development for AI coding agents: write requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md before Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot touch
Ui Ux Pro Max Skill
Free open-source design-intelligence skill that feeds UI styles, palettes, fonts, and chart rules into Claude Code, Cursor, and other AI coding assistants.
Tools that pair well with ADE
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside ADE, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Spec-Driven-Development
Spec-driven development for AI coding agents: write requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md before Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot touch
Ui Ux Pro Max Skill
Free open-source design-intelligence skill that feeds UI styles, palettes, fonts, and chart rules into Claude Code, Cursor, and other AI coding assistants.
Cursor
Cursor is an agent-first coding platform that plans, builds, tests and reviews software across desktop, CLI, Slack and cloud agents.
ADE vs its closest rival
ADE's closest head-to-head is with Bito — If you're a solo dev or freelancer juggling multiple AI coding agents across devices and want a free sync solution, ADE is ideal. For engineering teams wrestling with multi-repo complexity, cross-repo dependency mapping, and need to integrate deeply with Jira/Slack, Bito's system-wide context layer justifies its contact-sales pricing. Verdict generated
Frequently asked questions
Categories
Best-of guides
For makers of ADE
- Get a Verified Listing for ADE ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used ADE? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.