asqav is live · free plan, paid from $39/mo billed annually · last verified 8 Nov 2026 · viability monitor
asqav
Asqav gives AI agents signed audit-trail receipts with ML-DSA-65 signing and verification that needs no Asqav account
Asqav is the rare audit tool whose value survives leaving the vendor's UI: receipts verify against a snapshotted key directory with no account and no network. Business at $159/mo annually with a million signatures and SAML is the sensible regulated mid-market rung. Buy it only if someone outside your company will actually demand the record — otherwise it is expensive ceremony.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 61/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/asqav
- Compliance teams building signed AI agent records for EU AI Act Art. 12, DORA, SEC 17a-4, HIPAA or NYDFS 500 reviews
- Security teams running guardrails, approvals queues and quarantine with signed evidence behind each decision
- Platform teams whose customers or regulators must verify audit trails with no Asqav account and no network
- Regulated buyers who need offline or air-gapped verification of post-quantum signed agent records
- Teams that want traces, spans and latency dashboards — Langfuse or LangSmith do that job directly
- Projects with no regulatory recordkeeping, audit or counterparty-trust requirement
- Anyone expecting receipts to deliver compliance — Asqav says a receipt does not establish legal compliance
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Asqav if you only need traces, spans and latency dashboards rather than evidence a third party can verify, or if you cannot instrument your agents through an SDK, MCP server or supported framework integration in the first place.
Our "biggest gripe" note written Oct 9, 2026 quotes $79, which no longer matches the verified price table, so it is being re-reviewed and is not shown.
Our price-reality note written Oct 9, 2026 quotes $79, $948, which no longer matches the verified price table, so it is being re-reviewed and is not shown.
In short
asqav — Asqav gives AI agents signed audit-trail receipts with ML-DSA-65 signing and verification that needs no Asqav account. Best for Compliance teams building signed AI agent records for EU AI Act Art. 12, DORA, SEC 17a-4, HIPAA or NYDFS 500 reviews, Security teams running guardrails, approvals queues and quarantine with signed evidence behind each decision, Platform teams whose customers or regulators must verify audit trails with no Asqav account and no network. Free to start; paid plans from $39/mo billed annually.
What is asqav?
asqav — Asqav gives AI agents signed audit-trail receipts with ML-DSA-65 signing and verification that needs no Asqav account. Best for Compliance teams building signed AI agent records for EU AI Act Art. 12, DORA, SEC 17a-4, HIPAA or NYDFS 500 reviews, Security teams running guardrails, approvals queues and quarantine with signed evidence behind each decision, Platform teams whose customers or regulators must verify audit trails with no Asqav account and no network. Free to start; paid plans from $39/mo billed annually.
Asqav is an evidence layer for AI agents: every instrumented action becomes a receipt covering what the agent intended before the tool ran, the policy decision that gated it, and a fingerprint of what came back. Each receipt is signed with ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) and linked to the previous one by SHA-256, so editing anything earlier in the chain breaks verification. Signing runs out of process in a trust boundary separate from the agent — the vendor's argument is that a compromised agent cannot forge its own history. The receipt format is public, submitted as IETF Internet-Draft draft-marques-asqav-compliance-receipts, which the OWASP AI Exchange cites in its secure-logging guidance for tamper-evident AI-agent logging. Receipt fields map to recordkeeping regimes including EU AI Act Art. 12, DORA, SEC 17a-4, HIPAA §164.312(b), NYDFS 500, CIRCIA and Colorado's ADMT Act — and Asqav says plainly that a receipt alone does not establish compliance. Day-to-day use covers policy checks, an approvals queue, quarantine mode, incident management, audit export and a Replay API for reconstructing timelines. Python (pip install asqav) and TypeScript (npm install @asqav/sdk) clients wrap Vercel AI SDK and LangChain.js tool calls and connect Claude Code, OpenAI Agents, Codex, CrewAI, Google ADK, LlamaIndex, AWS Strands and others. Prompts, files and secrets stay with you; Asqav receives a fingerprint, never the content. The Free tier carries 25,000 signatures a month, Pro 250,000, Business 1,000,000, with Enterprise for custom volumes and retention up to five years. Independent verification is included on every plan, so a reviewer checks signatures and supplied evidence with no login. Positioning is deliberately narrow: this is for teams whose counterparty or regulator must check the record themselves, not for teams shopping for traces and latency dashboards.
Key features
- ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS 204) signing of every instrumented agent action
- SHA-256 chaining so editing an earlier receipt breaks the chain
- Three-phase receipts: intent, policy decision, outcome fingerprint
- Out-of-process signing in a trust boundary separate from the agent
- Offline and air-gapped verification via public key directory snapshot (SDK 0.6.0)
- Public verification page and SDK check with no Asqav account
- RFC 3161 and OpenTimestamps independent timestamps
- Universal receipt verification across 9 formats
- Python SDK (pip install asqav)
- TypeScript SDK (npm install @asqav/sdk) for Vercel AI SDK and LangChain.js tool calls
- Code-authorship receipts for AI coding agents
- Guardrails, approvals queue and quarantine mode
- Incident management with incident and risk classification
- Replay API, webhooks, OpenTelemetry and audit export
- Counterparty key registry and evidence custody on paid plans
Behind the verdict
Reach for Asqav when the audit question comes from outside: a customer's security reviewer, a regulator, or a counterparty who will not take your logs at face value. The design choice that matters is verification independence. SDK 0.6.0 snapshots the public key directory once, so a reviewer can check ML-DSA-65 receipts offline or in an air-gapped room. That is the difference between evidence and a screenshot of a dashboard. We'd also pick it when post-quantum signing is a stated requirement. ML-DSA-65 is NIST FIPS 204, and each receipt chains to the prior one by SHA-256, so a quiet edit anywhere upstream breaks the chain. Signing happens in a trust boundary separate from the agent — worth understanding if your threat model includes an agent that has been talked into rewriting its own record. Pass if what you actually need is observability. Traces, spans and latency charts are Langfuse and LangSmith territory; Asqav does not pretend to be that. High-frequency agent loops deserve a look at the request path too: a signing call per action, plus per-minute ceilings from 60 on Free to 1,000 on Enterprise, shapes what you instrument. Watch the metering. Signatures count per signing request and a single workflow can create several, so model usage before you connect production. Free stops at the daily cap; Pro and Business meter overage, and the vendor asks you to confirm the rate before committing. The honest caveat comes from Asqav itself: a receipt is not compliance. Reviewers still assess the system and its controls. Treat the compliance packs as scaffolding for a review, not a substitute for one. Where it bites: adopting a receipt format that is still an Internet-Draft means betting that the profile keeps its shape while regulators finalize. That bet looks better now
Limitations
- Free caps at 25,000 signatures/month with a 1,000-per-day cap, 10 agents, 3 team members, 30-day log retention, 10 policies and 2 reports/month; Pro is $39/mo billed annually ($468/yr) with 250,000 signatures/month, 50 agents, 10 team members, 1-year retention, 100 policies and 25 reports/month; Business is $159/mo annually with 1M signatures/month, 40,000/day, unlimited agents, 3-year retention; Enterprise is custom from $10,000/year.
- Asqav states plainly that a receipt alone does not establish compliance and that its claims describe shipped behavior, with the code as the final reference.
- Verification confirms the signed record's integrity, not the truth of a real-world claim inside it.
- Connecting an agent requires instrumenting it through the SDK or an integration, and signing keys live in an Asqav-managed KMS (Enterprise) rather than being customer-held.
as of 2026-10-09
Researching asqav? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is asqav still active?
asqav is live · free plan, paid from $39/mo billed annually · last verified 8 Nov 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is asqav? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What's new in asqav
Checked 8 days agoAcross the latest 4 updates: 2 feature updates and 2 news mentions.
Self-attested vs independently verifiable receipts
Asqav distinguishes platform-signed agent receipts from receipts anchored by an unaffiliated party that counterparties can verify without trusting the issuer.
OWASP AI Exchange cites the Asqav compliance-receipts profile
OWASP AI Exchange references draft-marques-asqav-compliance-receipts as an open profile for tamper-evident AI-agent logging under the EU AI Act, DORA and US sector rules.
Out-of-process signing for high-assurance agent audit trails
The signer moves into a separate trust boundary so a compromised agent cannot forge its own audit-trail receipts; code-authorship receipts also shipped for AI coding agents.
SDK 0.6.0: offline and air-gapped verification
The SDK snapshots the public key directory once, then verifies ML-DSA-65 post-quantum receipts with no network access.
What do users say about asqav?
What people actually say about asqav — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 23, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about asqav — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 8 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified asqav 13 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed description, who it suits, who should skip it, features, summary, pricing tiers, our verdict
- — changed platforms, pricing page
- — changed our verdict, who it suits, who should skip it, pricing tiers, description, features, summary
- — changed platforms, limitations, pricing page
- — changed summary, who should skip it, features, description, our verdict, pricing tiers, who it suits
- — changed pricing page, limitations, platforms, models
Showing the 6 most recent of 13 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does asqav cost in 2026?
asqav: Free to start; paid plans from $39/mo billed annually. Pricing last verified 8 Nov 2026.
Plans compared
Every published asqav tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Solo engineers and small teams piloting agent governance on a first workflow, or running a compliance proof-of-concept before committing budget.Adds: Starting tier and free entry point: 25,000 signatures/month with a 1,000/day cap, 10 agents, 3 team members, 30-day log retention, 10 policies, 2 reports/month and independent verification — no credit card required. |
| Pro | $39/mo billed annuallyVendor: “$39/mo billed annually ($468/yr); $49/mo monthly” | monthly, billed annually | Platform or security teams running a production agent fleet that has outgrown the Free daily cap and needs a 1-year evidence window for audits.Adds: Raises capacity to 250,000 signatures/month (10,000/day), 50 agents, 10 team members, 100 policies, 25 reports and 1-year retention, and adds RFC 3161 timestamps, webhooks, OpenTelemetry, audit export, Replay API and metered overage — $79/mo billed annually. |
| Business | $159/mo billed annuallyVendor: “$159/mo billed annually ($1,908/yr); $199/mo monthly” | monthly, billed annually | — |
| Enterprise | From $10,000/yrVendor: “Custom, from $10,000/yr” | yearly | Regulated organisations that must run a self-hosted signer, enforce SSO/SAML and IP allowlists, or collect multi-party signatures across several signers.Adds: Adds custom volumes and retention, self-hosted signer, multi-party signing, SSO/SAML, IP allowlist, bring-your-own KMS, SD-JWT credentials and dedicated support on top of everything in Pro. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Our hidden-costs note written Oct 9, 2026 quotes $79, which no longer matches the verified price table, so it is being re-reviewed and is not shown.
Our price-fit note written Oct 9, 2026 quotes $79, $948, which no longer matches the verified price table, so it is being re-reviewed and is not shown.
Has asqav's pricing changed?
No plan price for asqav has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick asqav?
Pick asqav if you are Compliance teams building signed AI agent records for EU AI Act Art. 12, DORA, SEC 17a-4, HIPAA or NYDFS 500 reviews, Security teams running guardrails, approvals queues and quarantine with signed evidence behind each decision, Platform teams whose customers or regulators must verify audit trails with no Asqav account and no network, Regulated buyers who need offline or air-gapped verification of post-quantum signed agent records.
Look elsewhere if you are Teams that want traces, spans and latency dashboards — Langfuse or LangSmith do that job directly, Projects with no regulatory recordkeeping, audit or counterparty-trust requirement, Anyone expecting receipts to deliver compliance — Asqav says a receipt does not establish legal compliance, High-throughput real-time agent loops where a per-action signing call sits on the request path.
Skip it if Skip Asqav if you only need traces, spans and latency dashboards rather than evidence a third party can verify, or if you cannot instrument your agents through an SDK, MCP server or supported framework integration in the first place.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas asqav actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Connects the trading-ops agent through the Python SDK with govern(), signs each action with its policy context, and generates an EU AI Act Article 12 evidence pack from the Reports view for the external reviewer.
Outcome: The reviewer verifies receipt signatures and timestamps on the public page without an Asqav account, so sign-off stops depending on screenshots from an internal log.
Registers agents, defines policies that block egress to unsanctioned domains, routes flagged actions to the approvals queue, and streams incidents to the existing SIEM over OpenTelemetry.
Outcome: Each blocked or approved action carries a signed receipt naming the policy and decision, so an incident review has evidence attached instead of a Slack thread.
Wraps AI code-generation tool calls so each change gets a code-authorship receipt, then attaches the per-agent public profile badge to the repository.
Outcome: Commit authorship is backed by a signed, chained record rather than a mutable git author string, and any reviewer can check the chain themselves.
Use cases
- Sign every API call an agent makes so each action carries a cryptographic receipt
- Assemble EU AI Act Article 12 audit packs and evidence bundles from signed receipts
- Enforce guardrails that block agent egress to unsanctioned domains
- Trace multi-agent workflow actions under a single trace_id across agents
- Verify ML-DSA-65 receipts offline in air-gapped environments from a snapshot key directory
- Reconstruct and replay any agent's action timeline via the Replay API
- Give auditors third-party read access to evidence without an Asqav account
- Record signed code-authorship for AI coding agents where git author strings are mutable
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of asqav — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
A pilot agent on the Free tier can be signing actions in well under an hour: install the Python SDK (pip install asqav) or TypeScript SDK, get an API key from the dashboard, call govern() to create the agent, and start signing. Teams wiring guardrails, policies, approvals and SIEM streaming through OpenTelemetry should budget a day or two. Air-gapped verification via the SDK 0.6.0 key-directory
Switching to or from asqav
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a general-purpose observability platform like Langfuse or LangSmith: keep it for traces and latency, and add Asqav alongside for signed receipts on the actions that need external proof.
- →From internal append-only audit logs: replace the self-managed log with signed, SHA-256 chained receipts so verification no longer depends on trusting your own database.
- →From manual screenshot evidence packs: instrument the agent with the SDK or MCP server and export receipt-backed reports instead of captured screenshots.
- ↗To Langfuse or LangSmith: move there if trace, span and latency debugging is the real need and cryptographic receipts are not required.
- ↗To a self-hosted signing setup: Enterprise offers a self-hosted signer, though the receipt format is public as an IETF Internet-Draft if you decide to implement it yourself.
- ↗To a broader GRC platform: export receipt evidence via the audit export and Replay API if governance moves into a larger compliance suite.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “asqav”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “asqav” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about asqav.
Official links
What are the best asqav alternatives?
The closest alternatives to asqav we list are Alma, Agentseal and DashClaw. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alma | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Agentseal | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| DashClaw | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to asqav
View all
Tools that pair well with asqav
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside asqav, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Alma
Self-hosted AI agent governance with an access map, Cedar policy gates and a signed audit ledger for Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI
Agentseal
AgentSeal red-teams AI agents and audits MCP servers with 380+ adversarial attack probes from one CLI.
DashClaw
An approval layer that freezes high-risk AI coding agent actions until a human signs off, then writes a signed audit record.
asqav vs its closest rival
asqav's closest head-to-head is with Push Security.
Our asqav vs Push Security verdict written Jul 2, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
Head-to-head comparisons
Asqav vs Push Security
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Asqav vs Audioeye
These aren't alternatives — they occupy different budget lines entirely. Buy Asqav if you need cryptographically signed, independently verifiable records of what AI agents did, especially where regulators or counterparties must check those records without trusting you. Buy AudioEye if your website has accessibility exposure and you want an outside party to monitor, fix and defend it. If you somehow have both problems, you'd purchase both and never compare them side by side.
GeneratedAsqav vs Sublime Security
Verdict being re-reviewed against current pricing and data.
Frequently asked questions
Our FAQ set (2 answers) written Oct 9, 2026 quotes $79, $948, which no longer matches the verified price table, so it is being re-reviewed and is not shown.
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
For makers of asqav
- Get a Verified Listing for asqav ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used asqav? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.