asqav
FreemiumCryptographic evidence layer for AI agent actions
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 03 Jul 2026
0 views
Added 7d ago
77/100Safe BetIn short
asqav — Cryptographic evidence layer for AI agent actions. Best for Compliance officers auditing AI agent deployments, Security teams enforcing AI governance policies, Developers building agentic workflows requiring audit trails. Free to use.
Is asqav actually worth it?
LiveSee what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
Editorial Verdict
Best for
Compliance officers auditing AI agent deploymentsSecurity teams enforcing AI governance policiesDevelopers building agentic workflows requiring audit trailsEnterprise risk managers needing regulator-ready evidence
Not ideal for
Teams wanting a simple logging solution without cryptographic overheadProjects not subject to regulatory compliance requirementsOrganizations unwilling to run a third-party signing service
Asqav offers a unique cryptographic approach to AI agent governance, filling a gap left by traditional logging. Its focus on verifiable, portable receipts makes it a strong choice for regulated industries, though the complexity may be overkill for casual use.
Last verified: July 2026
What independent users actually report about asqav
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
2 mentions across 1 source (Bluesky).
80% positive20% critical
Recurring strengths
- +Post-quantum ML-DSA-65 signing ensures long-term security.
- +Offline verification supports air-gapped environments.
- +Compliance bundles tailored for EU AI Act, DORA, NYDFS.
- +MIT-licensed open-source SDK lowers adoption barriers.
- +Tamper-evident receipts with SHA-256 hash chain.
Recurring frustrations
- −Very limited community feedback; hard to assess reliability.
- −Early-stage product may have incomplete documentation.
- −No known large-scale production deployments yet.
- −Potential latency from signing every agent action.
- −Free tier limits not clearly stated in available info.
Patterns worth knowing
Unique compliance niche for cryptographic proof of AI agent actions.
Seen on Bluesky
Open-source SDK (MIT) encourages community adoption.
Seen on Bluesky
Need for greater awareness and community validation.
Seen on Bluesky
Learning curve
beginnerProductive in ~30 seconds with CLI, but full integration may take a few hours
Hidden costs people mention
- • Custom pricing for compliance bundles not publicly listed
- • Possible overage charges for high-volume signing
Viability Score
77/100
Safe BetHow likely is asqav to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
momentum
55
funding runway
80
website health
90
wrapper dependency
100
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Cryptographic signing of agent actions (ML-DSA-65)
- Tamper-evident receipts with SHA-256 hash chain
- Three-phase signing: intent, decision, execution
- RFC 3161 and OpenTimestamps anchoring
- Policy enforcement and guardrails
- Incident management and quarantine mode
- Replay API for action timeline reconstruction
- Offline/air-gapped verification (SDK 0.6.0)
- Compliance bundles for EU AI Act, DORA, NYDFS
- Multi-party signing for approval workflows
- Scope tokens with nonce-based replay protection
- A2A Agent Card governance metadata
- SIEM streaming and webhook integrations
- TypeScript SDK (npm @asqav/sdk)
- COSE_Sign1 export for SCITT transparency
About asqav
FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableAPI · CLI
Asqav provides cryptographic proof for every action an AI agent performs, creating tamper-evident receipts that can be verified by anyone. It is designed for organizations that need to demonstrate compliance with regulations such as the EU AI Act, DORA, and NYDFS. The service signs agent actions at the moment they occur, recording intent, policy decision, execution, and a chain of prior actions. Unlike traditional logging, Asqav's receipts are portable, verifiable offline, and structured in regulator-ready formats. It also includes policy enforcement, guardrails, and incident management, integrating with popular AI frameworks like LangChain, CrewAI, and n8n. Key features include post-quantum ML-DSA-65 signing, offline verification via public key directory snapshots, and IETF-standard compliance receipts. The TypeScript SDK is now live, and the CLI lets you try it in 30 seconds. Governance metadata can be embedded in A2A Agent Cards, and receipts can be exported as COSE_Sign1 for SCITT transparency services. Unlike conventional logging or monitoring tools, Asqav focuses on portable, verifiable evidence rather than siloed audit logs. It fills a unique niche for regulated industries needing provable AI governance.
Behind the Verdict
Asqav is purpose-built for one thing: making AI agent actions provably tamper-evident. If you're in a regulated industry facing the EU AI Act, DORA, or NYDFS, this is likely the most mature option available. The post-quantum ML-DSA-65 signing, offline verification, and IETF draft compliance receipts show serious engineering depth. When should you pick Asqav? When you need to prove to a regulator or auditor exactly what an AI agent did, in a format that's portable and verifiable offline. The 30-second CLI demo is a nice touch for evaluation. The TypeScript and Python SDKs make integration straightforward for developers. Where it bites: this is overkill for teams that just need basic logging. If you're not subject to compliance requirements, the cryptographic overhead adds complexity without benefit. It's also a third-party service, which may pose concerns for air-gapped environments (though offline verification mitigates this). Compared to alternatives like standard logging (e.g., ELK stack), Asqav provides actual evidence, not just logs. For compliance-driven use cases, that's a decisive advantage. For everyone else, it's extra baggage.
Researching asqav? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Use Cases
- Sign every API call made by an AI agent with cryptographic receipts
- Generate compliance bundles for EU AI Act audits in one click
- Enforce policy guardrails that block egress to unsanctioned domains
- Trace multi-agent workflow actions with a single trace_id
- Verify agent receipts offline without network access
- Reconstruct and replay any agent's action timeline from signed logs
Limitations
- The free plan caps at 25K events per month and only 3 team members.
- Enterprise features like self-hosted signing require contacting sales, and the service currently only supports ML-DSA-65 for signing (no alternative algorithms).
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Popular in Security & Privacy
Push Security
Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.
FreemiumTry
Sublime Security
AI-driven email security for advanced threat detection with low false positives.
PaidTry
Used asqav? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.