asqav vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | asqav | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cryptographic evidence layer for AI agents | Browser security platform |
| Pricing | Freemium (enterprise quote) | Freemium (enterprise quote) |
| Key Feature | Post-quantum signing of agent actions | Real-time browser attack detection & AI visibility |
| Compliance Focus | AI agent action audit trail (EU AI Act, DORA, NYDFS) | AI tool usage compliance (EU AI Act) |
| Deployment | SDK/API (offline/air-gapped verification) | Browser extension + cloud (multi-browser) |
| Best For | Compliance teams auditing agent actions | Security teams defending browser-based attacks |
Choose Push Security if your priority is real-time defense against browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and visibility into employee AI tool usage. Choose Asqav if you need cryptographically verifiable audit trails for AI agent actions to meet compliance requirements like EU AI Act or DORA. They address different problems — Push secures the browser environment, Asqav ensures agent action integrity.
Cryptographically signed, independently verifiable receipts for every AI agent action.
Visit Website
Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: asqav vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
asqav
2 mentions across 1 sources · 60% positive — mixed (averaged across 1 source)
Bluesky
What users praise
- • Cryptographic proof for every AI agent action with tamper-evident receipts.
- • Post-quantum ML-DSA-65 signing future-proofs against quantum attacks.
- • Offline verification via public key directory snapshots for air-gapped use.
- • Three-phase signing captures intent, decision, and execution for full audit.
What frustrates them
- • Very early-stage with limited user base and real-world feedback.
- • Enterprise pricing is not publicly listed; may be expensive for small teams.
- • Documentation and community resources are still sparse.
- • Requires intermediate technical skill; not beginner-friendly.
Researched Jul 23, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
- • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
- • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
- • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.
What frustrates them
- • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
- • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
- • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
- • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.
Researched Sep 8, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security analyst defending against browser attacksPick: Push Security
Push Security provides real-time detection of AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious browser extensions, which are common attack vectors. The agentic threat hunting and browser telemetry help uncover incidents faster.
- Compliance officer auditing AI agent workflowsPick: asqav
Asqav delivers cryptographic receipts for each agent action, with offline verifiability and compliance bundles for EU AI Act, DORA, and NYDFS. This provides regulator-ready evidence that traditional logging cannot.
- Developer building agentic workflowsPick: asqav
Asqav integrates easily with popular frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI, n8n) and provides SDKs for Python and TypeScript (launched April 2026). The three-phase signing ensures all actions are auditable.
- Identity team managing unmanaged SaaS and MFAPick: Push Security
Push Security detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS, enforces in-browser MFA guardrails, and helps harden unmanaged identities without deploying an enterprise browser.
- Risk manager needing agent action integrityPick: asqav
Asqav’s tamper-evident receipts and replay API provide a clear timeline of agent actions, supporting incident response and risk analysis. The multi-party signing enables approval workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
asqav vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if your priority is real-time defense against browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and visibility into employee AI tool usage. Choose Asqav if you need cryptographically verifiable audit trails for AI agent actions to meet compliance requirements like EU AI Act or DORA. They address different problems — Push secures the browser environment, Asqav ensures agent action integrity.
Can Push Security and Asqav be used together?
Yes, they are complementary. Push Security secures the browser and monitors AI tool usage, while Asqav provides cryptographic audit trails for AI agent actions. A security team could use both to cover browser threats and agent integrity.
Do both tools require agents or extensions?
Push Security deploys via browser extension. Asqav integrates via SDK or API into your agent framework; no browser extension is needed.
Which tool is better for EU AI Act compliance?
Both assist with EU AI Act compliance. Push Security helps monitor and control employee AI tool usage; Asqav provides a cryptographic evidence layer for agent actions, which directly supports the act's transparency and logging requirements.
Can I verify Asqav receipts offline?
Yes, as of SDK 0.6.0 (June 2026), Asqav supports offline and air-gapped verification by snapshotting the public key directory once; no network access is needed.
Does Push Security detect AI agents used by attackers?
Yes, Push Security detects AI-enabled attacks like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and ConsentFix, which often leverage AI to craft convincing attacks. The platform also identifies malicious OAuth integrations.
What integrations does Asqav support for agent frameworks?
Asqav integrates with OpenAI, Claude, LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, n8n, LiteLLM, Vercel, and MCP Server.
Can Push Security replace an enterprise browser?
Push Security works across all major browsers without requiring migration to a single-vendor enterprise browser. It provides security controls and visibility without changing the user's browser.
Do both tools have free tiers?
Yes, both offer freemium pricing. Specific limits are not publicly detailed; it's best to contact each vendor for exact free tier capabilities.
More asqav or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 2, 2026