Push Security
Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Push is a compelling choice for security teams that need to close the browser-based attack gap and reign in shadow AI. The $5/user/month entry point is a low-risk start, and the browser-native control catches what CASBs and SWGs miss. But it won't replace your EDR or full DLP—evaluate if you need an enterprise browser instead.
Verified 1d ago · liveness 79/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/push-security
- Security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing and ClickFix
- Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
- Organizations securing employee use of AI tools and preventing data leakage to LLMs
- Teams wanting to detect shadow SaaS and ghost logins without deploying an enterprise browser
- Organizations requiring full endpoint DLP beyond browser data loss
- Teams already committed to a single enterprise browser vendor with no multi-browser need
- Environments where browser extension deployment is blocked by strict endpoint control policies
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Push Security if you need full endpoint DLP or EDR—it only covers browser-based threats, or if your environment forbids browser extension deployment.
Enterprise tier requires contacting sales for custom pricing, so costs are unknown until you engage
Push's Standard tier at $5/user/month is competitive for mid-market teams (up to 500 employees) compared to enterprise-grade alternatives like Netskope or CrowdStrike, which often run higher. For smaller teams, free tiers or cheaper point solutions might suffice, but Push offers unique browser-native AI security that justifies the cost for security-conscious orgs.
In short
Push Security — Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage. Best for Security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing and ClickFix, Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption, Organizations securing employee use of AI tools and preventing data leakage to LLMs. Free to start; paid plans from $5/user/mo.
What people actually say about Push Security — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
30 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy) · researched Aug 26, 2026.
- +Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- +Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- +Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- +Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
- +Ghost login discovery and MFA/SSO guardrails help harden unmanaged identities.
- −No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- −Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- −High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- −Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
- −Dependence on agentic AI for threat hunting raises reliability questions if the AI misfires.
- • Advanced features like agentic hunting and extensive integrations likely require paid tiers, but pricing is opaque.
- • Potential costs for additional browser coverage, though the tool claims to support many browsers for free.
- • Implementation and training may require paid professional services or internal security expertise.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Push Security? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Behavioral phishing detection
- Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing detection and blocking
- ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
- Device code phishing detection and blocking
- Malicious OAuth consent blocking
- Session hijacking detection
- Credential stuffing detection
- Ghost login detection and SSO guardrails
- MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
- Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
- AI prompt and data input monitoring
- AI file upload monitoring and blocking
- Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
- Autonomous threat hunting agents
- Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
About Push Security
Push Security is a browser security platform that detects and blocks attacks in real time, right where they happen—inside the browser. Positioned for security and identity teams, it combines telemetry, real-time control, and autonomous agents to stop AI-enabled phishing, secure AI tool usage, harden unmanaged identities, and prevent data loss. It deploys as a lightweight extension across all major browsers, including AI-native and enterprise browsers, without requiring migration or endpoint agents. The platform tackles a wide range of browser-based threats: behavioral phishing detection, adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attacks, ClickFix clipboard injection, device code phishing, malicious OAuth consents, session hijacking, and credential stuffing. It also inventories and controls AI apps, monitors prompts and file uploads, and blocks unsanctioned tools, including agentic browsers like Comet, Atlas, and Dia. Identity features surface ghost logins, enforce MFA and SSO guardrails, and detect weak, reused, or leaked passwords. Push extends protection to BYOD and Chromebooks without endpoint agents, and its data controls cover clipboard, file uploads, downloads, and domain-based access. It complements existing security stacks like SWGs and CASBs by providing visibility and control over browser-native threats that other tools miss. Pricing starts at $5/user/month for Standard (up to 500 employees) with a monthly or annual option, and Enterprise plans for 500+ employees offer volume discounts via sales contact.
Behind the Verdict
Push earns its keep in two scenarios: stopping browser-native attacks that bypass email gateways and SWGs, and getting visibility over the AI apps your employees are already using. If you've seen AiTM phishing or ClickFix attacks slip through, Push's in-browser detection is a strong add. The autonomous hunting agents are a differentiator—they work at machine speed, which makes a difference when attackers are automating. Where it falls short is as a replacement for your broader security stack. It won't cover endpoint DLP or endpoint detection and response. If you're already mandated to use a single enterprise browser like Island, you'll find overlap, and you may not need Push. Also, if your policy blocks browser extensions entirely, you'll have to rethink deployment. Compared to CASBs, Push gives you real-time, in-browser control rather than after-the-fact logs. It's a complement, not a replacement—keep your SWG for URL filtering, but use Push for the deeper browser-layer detection. The $5/user/month Standard tier is a low-risk way to test it out, and the Enterprise tier adds volume discounts, which helps at scale. For identity teams, the ghost login and MFA guardrails are practical. You get visibility into non-SSO logins and can enforce guardrails without rolling out a full identity product. For AI governance, the ability to block unsanctioned tools and monitor prompts is a differentiator, especially with agentic browsers on the rise. The biggest watch-out is deployment: it's a browser extension, so if your endpoint controls are strict, adoption could be a hurdle. But if you can get it deployed, the coverage is broad—Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Brave, Opera, Arc, and enterprise browsers like Island and Prisma Access Browser.
Researching Push Security? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Push Security actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Detect and respond to an AiTM phishing campaign targeting employees
Outcome: Push's autonomous agents detect the phishing page in real time, block it across all browsers, and alert the analyst with session-level telemetry for investigation.
Enforce MFA and strong credentials on unmanaged devices
Outcome: Push surfaces ghost logins and enforces MFA guardrails in-browser, requiring employees on BYOD to use MFA before accessing critical apps, reducing account takeover risk.
Monitor and control shadow AI usage across the organization
Outcome: Push inventories all AI tools used by employees, monitors prompts and file uploads, and blocks unsanctioned AI apps, providing a central dashboard to enforce AI policy.
Use Cases
- Detect and respond to credential theft from AiTM phishing pages in real time
- Monitor and block unauthorized OAuth consent grants to malicious apps
- Discover and control shadow SaaS and AI tools used by employees
- Prevent data leakage to LLMs by monitoring and blocking sensitive pastes and uploads
- Investigate browser-based incidents with session-level telemetry evidence
- Harden access on unmanaged devices and Chromebooks without endpoint agents
- Enforce MFA and strong credentials across all browser sessions
- Maintain compliance with AI regulations by monitoring browser-based AI interactions
Limitations
- Push Security is a browser-based security product that detects and blocks browser-based attacks and secures employee AI usage through in-browser controls.
- It covers phishing, AiTM, ClickFix, device code phishing, malicious OAuth integrations, browser extensions, malicious file downloads, ghost logins, mobile phishing, credential stuffing, and session hijacking.
- It also provides visibility and control over shadow SaaS and AI apps, and supports BYOD and Chromebooks without endpoint agents.
- Pricing details are not provided on the public site.
as of 2026-08-29
Verification history
We have re-verified Push Security 74 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 74 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Push Security tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Standard
$5/user/month
Ideal for
Mid-market security teams with up to 500 employees needing browser-based attack detection and AI policy enforcement
What this tier adds
Starting tier with all core features: AiTM phishing detection, ClickFix blocking, session hijacking detection, shadow AI discovery, OAuth blocking, extension inventory, and configurable DLP for file downloads.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Large organizations (500+ employees) requiring volume discounts, dedicated support, and advanced customization
What this tier adds
Adds volume discounts, dedicated support and onboarding, advanced reporting, and priority access to new features.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Push Security's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Push's Standard tier at $5/user/month is competitive for mid-market teams (up to 500 employees) compared to enterprise-grade alternatives like Netskope or CrowdStrike, which often run higher. For smaller teams, free tiers or cheaper point solutions might suffice, but Push offers unique browser-native AI security that justifies the cost for security-conscious orgs.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Push Security — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Security teams can deploy the browser extension to employees in under an hour using MDM or GPO. Autonomous agents start detecting threats within the first day; full policy tuning and integration with SIEM/SOAR may take a few days.
Switching to or from Push Security
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Enterprise Browser (e.g., Island): Push extends protection to all browsers, removing single-browser lock-in while retaining similar security controls.
- →From CASB/SWG: Push complements existing stacks by adding browser-native threat detection and AI control, covering gaps left by network-level filtering.
- ↗To a Full EDR/DLP Platform: If you need endpoint-wide coverage, you'd layer Push with EDR or migrate to a comprehensive platform like CrowdStrike Falcon.
- ↗To an Enterprise Browser: Some teams may adopt a dedicated enterprise browser like Island or Prisma Access Browser, but Push already integrates with those browsers.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Push Security
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Push Security, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Looker vs Push Security
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing and securing AI tool usage, Push Security is the clear fit. If you need a governed, AI-driven analytics platform native to Google Cloud with a semantic layer for trusted metrics, Looker is the right pick. For companies that need both, the two products are complementary, not competitive.
Amplitude vs Push Security
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. Amplitude is for product and growth teams analyzing user behavior and optimizing experiences. Evaluate based on your primary use case: security vs. analytics.
Sentry vs Push Security
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you need to debug production errors and improve code quality, Sentry is the clear choice with Seer AI, Autofix, and session replay. These tools are complementary — they solve entirely different problems.
Datadog vs Push Security
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS) and securing AI tool usage with identity guardrails. They serve different domains; a joint stack is possible but not overlapping.
Power Bi vs Push Security
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business intelligence tool for data analytics. Your choice should be based on whether you need to secure browser-based threats and AI usage (Push Security) or visualize and analyze data (Power BI). They are not direct competitors.
Tableau vs Push Security
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (Tableau). Push Security is essential for security teams combating browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, while Tableau is a top-tier analytics platform for business intelligence. They are not direct competitors; evaluate based on your primary use case.
Planetscale vs Push Security
These tools solve fundamentally different problems: Push Security secures browsers against AI-powered phishing and OAuth attacks, while PlanetScale provides fast, scalable cloud databases. Choose Push if your main need is protecting identities and AI usage in the browser – its fresh browser attacks matrix (2026-05-08) shows deep expertise. Choose PlanetScale if you need horizontal sharding for MySQL or the fastest cloud Postgres – its new web console for Postgres (2026-06-22) makes management easier.
Neon vs Push Security
These tools solve entirely different problems: Push Security is a browser security platform for defending against AiTM phishing, OAuth attacks, and AI data loss; Neon is a serverless Postgres platform with branching and vector search for developers. Choose Push if you need to protect browser-based workflows from advanced phishing and shadow SaaS, or Neon if you need an auto-scaling database with development-friendly branching and AI agent backend.
Cloudflare vs Push Security
Push Security and Cloudflare serve different primary needs. Push is laser-focused on browser-based threats (AiTM, ClickFix, AI DLP) and identity hardening, ideal for security teams that need visibility into user browsing and AI tool usage without switching browsers. Cloudflare is a broader platform for developers and security teams needing CDN, serverless compute, Zero Trust networking, and edge AI — but lacks deep browser threat detection. Choose Push if browser security is your priority; choose Cloudflare if you need a unified edge platform with some security overlays.
Council vs Push Security
These tools address completely different problems. Choose Push Security if you're a security or identity team fighting AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and data leaks from employee AI use. Choose Council if you're a researcher or developer who wants to reduce single-LLM bias by comparing and reviewing answers from multiple models on macOS. There's no overlap — your use case determines the pick.
Screenmind vs Push Security
If your priority is browser security – blocking AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS, and AI data leaks – Push Security is the clear choice. But if you need private, on-device screen memory for personal productivity and recall, ScreenMind is a groundbreaking free tool. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you're securing a workforce or augmenting your own memory.
Openbrowserclaw vs Push Security
If you're an enterprise security team fighting AiTM phishing and shadow AI, Push Security is a must-have — its agentic threat hunting and real-time controls are unmatched. For a privacy-focused individual who wants an offline AI assistant without any infrastructure, Openbrowserclaw is perfect. Choose based on whether your priority is securing a workforce or empowering yourself locally.
Alternatives to Push Security
View allVectra AI
AI-native network detection and response platform that stops hybrid attacks across network, identity, and cloud.
Cyberhaven
AI-native data security platform for the agentic enterprise, with DSPM, DLP, and IRM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Push Security? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.