Push Security
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
For teams under 500 seats, the published $5/user/month with a self-serve trial makes this the easiest browser security decision to pilot — nothing to install beyond an extension. The shadow AI and ghost-login visibility is the part phishing-only tools miss entirely. Go in knowing browser-scoped DLP stops at browser data flows.
Verified 2h ago · liveness 81/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/push-security
- Security teams seeing AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking or device code phishing bypass email and SWG controls
- Identity teams hunting ghost logins, non-SSO password fallback paths and credential stuffing
- Organizations needing shadow AI discovery plus control over prompts, clipboard use and LLM uploads
- Teams wanting browser telemetry and autonomous response without an enterprise browser migration or endpoint agent
- Organizations needing DLP coverage outside browser data flows, such as native apps or API-based exfiltration
- Environments where endpoint policy blocks browser extensions outright
- Buyers looking for a standalone email security gateway replacement
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Push Security if your phishing arrives mainly as email attachments, your endpoint policy already blocks browser extensions, or you need DLP coverage on data that never touches a browser.
Standard pricing caps at organisations of up to 500 employees, so crossing that headcount moves you to a custom Enterprise quote with volume discounts rather than the published $5/user/month.
At $5/user/month for organisations up to 500 employees, Push undercuts most browser-security and identity-threat vendors, who commonly price per seat in the mid-teens and above or quote per known-user. The rate is quoted per user per month and is available on monthly or annual billing, so the annual figure is lower than a month-to-month commitment. Above 500 employees pricing moves to a custom Enterprise quote with volume discounts — posture-rationalisation vendors like Silent Push or full
In short
Push Security — Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the. Best for Security teams seeing AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking or device code phishing bypass email and SWG controls, Identity teams hunting ghost logins, non-SSO password fallback paths and credential stuffing, Organizations needing shadow AI discovery plus control over prompts, clipboard use and LLM uploads. Free to start; paid plans from $5/user/mo.
What's new in Push Security
Checked todayAcross the latest 1 update: 1 news mention.
What people actually say about Push Security — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
23 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy) · researched Oct 14, 2026.
Weighted by the 30 posts each of 3 sources contributed.
- +Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- +Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- +Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- +Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
- +AI governance layer covers shadow AI, prompt monitoring and agentic browser detection
- −Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- −Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- −Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- −Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
- −Enterprise pricing for 500+ seats is quote-only and undisclosed
- • Enterprise tier is quote-only; no public pricing above 500 seats
- • Potential deployment/onboarding effort to roll extension to every browser profile
- • No published data on support tier pricing or premium SLA costs
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Push Security? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
- Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection
- ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
- Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
- OAuth consent monitoring, consent blocking and app removal
- Session hijacking and credential attack detection
- Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring and default-deny allowlisting
- Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
- Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
- AI prompt and data-input monitoring with AI clipboard monitoring and blocking
- AI file upload monitoring plus AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring
- AI usage policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools
- Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
- Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block
- Browser DLP with file download, upload and clipboard telemetry and blocking
About Push Security
Push Security is a browser security platform for security and identity teams whose incidents start with a click, not an email attachment. Delivery is the argument: a browser extension that runs across all popular browsers, including AI and enterprise browsers and Chromebooks, with no endpoint agent and no forced migration to a single enterprise browser. Every session produces telemetry that autonomous agents hunt at machine speed, writing detection rules and deploying blocks without waiting on an analyst. Threat detection covers what slips past email and secure web gateways: AiTM reverse-proxy phishing, cloned login pages, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle, ClickFix clipboard injection, device code phishing, session hijacking and credential attacks. Each control runs in monitor, warn or block mode, and investigation gets user and session timelines with trace reconstruction across tabs and popups. The AI and identity layers are where it separates from a commodity phishing extension. Secure AI adds shadow AI app discovery, agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia, AI prompt and data-input monitoring, AI clipboard and file upload monitoring, AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring and policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools. Identity hardening covers non-SSO login visibility, ghost logins on password fallback paths, MFA status and in-browser guardrails, weak or reused or leaked password detection and shared account detection. Pricing is published: Standard is $5/user/month for up to 500 employees with a self-serve trial, and Enterprise for 500+ seats is a conversation with volume discounts. Push also appears in Proofpoint's partner ecosystem for in-browser threat protection. Against enterprise browser vendors you trade convergence for deployment speed; against phishing-only extensions you get AI and identity visibility they don't cover.
Behind the Verdict
Most account takeover incidents we hear about start the same way: a link, a convincing clone, a session token lifted before anyone notices. Push bets the control point has moved from the endpoint to the browser, and the extension-first model is what makes that bet practical — no agent rollout, no forcing everyone onto one enterprise browser. Pick it when your existing stack keeps missing AiTM, ClickFix or device code phishing, or when identity teams can't see ghost logins on password fallback paths. The shadow AI angle matters just as much in 2026: employees paste data into prompts and authorize agents faster than anyone can inventory manually, and Push surfaces that plus policy enforcement in the same console. Pass if your incidents are still attachment-delivered malware — that's email security's job, not this. Pass too if DLP has to cover native apps and API exfiltration, because browser-scoped controls stop at browser data flows. And if you already mandate a single enterprise browser as corporate policy, Push is a different strategy rather than a bolt-on. The closest comparison is enterprise browser vendors pushing convergence. Push trades that consolidation for speed of deployment, which suits mixed, BYOD-heavy, Chromebook-using environments. The Proofpoint partnership is a real plus if you already run their stack — it puts in-browser protection inside an ecosystem you've bought into. Practical caveat: environments where endpoint policy blocks browser extensions outright will fight the deployment before they see any value. Get that cleared first.
Researching Push Security? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Push Security actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Deploy the browser extension across Chrome, Edge and ChromeOS, start all controls in monitor mode for two weeks, then switch AiTM, ClickFix and device code phishing controls to block while leaving AI controls warning-only until policy is agreed.
Outcome: Live phishing attempts are blocked at the page instead of at the email gateway, and you have two weeks of baseline evidence to justify enforcement to the business.
Turn on SSO login detection, ghost login detection, MFA status monitoring, weak/reused/leaked password detection and shared account detection, then use the identity provider detection and SSO usage trend monitoring to find apps where people never authenticate through SSO.
Outcome: Hidden password fallback paths surface as a list you can work, MFA guardrails trigger when a user starts a weak login, and the IAM team gets an app-by-app picture of SSO coverage gaps.
Wire Push into Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel and Slack, enable screenshot capture on detection events, and lean on the autonomous threat-hunting agents to sweep browsers for the latest AiTM and ClickFix variants hitting the threat-research feeds.
Outcome: Detection events land in the existing SIEM with session-level browser telemetry attached, and triage starts from the rendered page rather than a gateway log line.
Use Cases
- Detect and block credential theft from AiTM reverse-proxy phishing pages in real time
- Stop ClickFix clipboard injection attacks before the malicious command is pasted
- Block device code phishing kits designed to get around passkeys
- Catch malicious OAuth consent grants before access is authorised
- Discover and control shadow AI apps employees are using in the browser
- Prevent sensitive data leaving via AI prompts, clipboard pastes and file uploads
- Inventory and block risky browser extensions
- Investigate browser-based incidents with session-level telemetry and detection screenshots
Limitations
- Public pages describe a browser-native security product spanning phishing, AiTM, ClickFix, device code phishing, malicious OAuth integrations, browser extensions, file downloads, ghost logins, mobile phishing, credential stuffing and session hijacking, plus shadow AI, shadow IT, SaaS visibility, DLP and BYOD/Chromebook coverage.
- The evidence provides no effectiveness data — no published detection rates, false-positive figures or independent test results — and the pricing text supplied here contains no tiers or pricing detail.
- Deployment is delivered as a browser extension, so protection and AI/shadow-AI visibility depend on that extension being installed in the user's browser rather than on endpoint agents or MDM.
- No API or developer documentation appeared in the reviewed pages, so integration depth and any API support should be validated in a pilot.
as of 2026-09-29
Verification history
We have re-verified Push Security 108 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 108 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Push Security tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Standard
$5/user/month
Ideal for
Mid-market security teams of up to 500 employees who need browser-layer phishing defense and AI visibility without an endpoint rollout.
What this tier adds
Starting tier at $5/user/month on monthly or annual billing, capped at organisations of up to 500 employees, covering behavioral phishing, AiTM, ClickFix, ghost login, session hijacking detection and shadow AI app discovery.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Organisations with 500+ employees that need the full detection set plus OAuth consent monitoring, password protection controls and negotiated volume pricing.
What this tier adds
Adds OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal, password strength enforcement, and SaaS/shadow app discovery with approval workflows on top of the Standard set, priced by quote with volume discounts.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Push Security's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
At $5/user/month for organisations up to 500 employees, Push undercuts most browser-security and identity-threat vendors, who commonly price per seat in the mid-teens and above or quote per known-user. The rate is quoted per user per month and is available on monthly or annual billing, so the annual figure is lower than a month-to-month commitment. Above 500 employees pricing moves to a custom Enterprise quote with volume discounts — posture-rationalisation vendors like Silent Push or full
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Push Security — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a mid-market security lead, expect days rather than hours to first value: extension deployment across browsers is fast, but per-control tuning (monitor, warn, block) and alert routing into your SIEM take the bulk of the time. Enterprise identity teams adding ghost login, password and MFA controls should plan a couple of weeks for SSO trend analysis and app classification to settle before
Switching to or from Push Security
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From secure web gateway alone: keep the SWG in place and add Push on top, since Push is designed to catch identity threats in the browser after the connection has been allowed.
- →From remote browser isolation: move interactive browsing back to the native browser for covered users and use Push to detect the same attacks without proxying every session.
- →From security awareness training simulations: redirect the phishing programme toward blocking real phishing in the browser, using Push detections as the teaching material.
- →From an unmanaged set of MV3 browser extensions: replace individual ad-hoc extensions with one inventory, risk score and allowlist managed by the security team.
- ↗To a cloud access security broker: if you need inspection of non-browser traffic or network-level control, Push will not cover it and a CASB operates at a layer Push deliberately sits outside.
- ↗To an enterprise browser: if your strategy is a managed browser rather than an extension, Push's browser-extension deployment model is not how that migration is delivered.
- ↗To an endpoint-only stack: if endpoint policy blocks browser extensions outright, the extension cannot be installed and you would need an endpoint-based alternative.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Push Security
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Push Security, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Island
Island is an enterprise browser and agentic control plane that builds Zero Trust security, SASE networking, and AI governance into Chromium
Securiti
Securiti unifies DSPM, privacy automation, and AI security for enterprises on its DataAI Command Platform.
Acronis Cyber Protect
AI-native cyber protection platform combining backup, disaster recovery, endpoint security, and RMM for MSPs.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Amplitude vs Push Security
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consent phishing) and govern shadow AI without an endpoint agent or browser migration — and it is priced per user, cited at $5/user/month. Amplitude answers a product question — what users do, why they churn, and whether your agent or feature change moved retention — priced by events with unlimited seats. Buy both if you have both problems; pick neither against the other.
Sentry vs Push Security
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and ghost logins bypass your email gateway and SSO — and you want shadow AI prompt/upload/clipboard control via a browser extension rather than an endpoint agent or browser migration. Buy Sentry if you're a developer or platform team that needs errors, logs, traces, replays, and profiles correlated on one trace, with Seer debugging and Autofix patches on top. Many organizations will end up paying for both, out of different budgets, for different teams.
Looker vs Push Security
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing, risky OAuth grants, malicious extensions) and uncontrolled employee AI use, Push Security is the pick, and at roughly $5/user/month it's a cheap layer your email gateway and SWG are blind to. If your problem is governed metrics with Gemini-powered Q&A over BigQuery, Looker is the pick — but budget for LookML modeling staff and a sales cycle, not a self-serve checkout. Buy both only if you happen to be a Google Cloud enterprise with a security team; that's coincidence, not overlap.
Datadog vs Push Security
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure; expect usage-based pricing that scales with hosts, logs, and GPU fleets. Buy Push Security if your specific pain is AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing, ghost logins, or shadow AI use that slips past your email gateway and SWG — at a flat $5/user/month under 500 seats. If you already run Datadog, Push Security is a plausible feed into it, not a replacement. Nobody should be choosing one 'instead of' the other.
Power Bi vs Push Security
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM reverse-proxy phishing, ClickFix, device-code or consent phishing, malicious extensions, or unmanaged employee AI usage, Push Security is the only one of the two that addresses it, and its sub-500-seat $5/user/month positioning makes it easy to pilot. If your problem is turning data into governed, shareable dashboards inside a Microsoft-centric stack, Power BI is the tool — and Push Security does nothing for it. Buy them for different teams, different budgets and different risk registers.
Tableau vs Push Security
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/month. Tableau is a visual analytics platform for building dashboards and exploring governed data, now extending with Tableau Next Service Insights. A security leader evaluating Push Security is not comparing it to Tableau, and a data analyst choosing Tableau is not comparing it to Push Security. Budget for each belongs in a different line item.
Planetscale vs Push Security
These are not competing products, so there's no head-to-head to pick from. Push Security is a browser-extension defense layer for security and identity teams — phishing, AiTM, ClickFix, device-code and consent phishing, malicious extensions, plus shadow-AI visibility — priced predictably at $5/user/month for teams under 500 seats. PlanetScale is infrastructure for engineers: managed Postgres and Vitess with NVMe storage, branch-per-environment schema workflows, and recent engineering work on Neki (sharded Postgres) and per-shard Vitess sizing. A budget shortlist would only include both if one org simultaneously needed phishing defense and a database platform — two separate line items, two separate owners.
Neon vs Push Security
These aren't competitors — you'd never pick one over the other. Push Security is a $5/user/month browser extension that stops AiTM, ClickFix, device-code, and consent phishing and inventories shadow AI usage for security and identity teams under 500 seats. Neon is a serverless Postgres platform for developers who want autoscaling, copy-on-write branching, and a fuller backend (object storage, Functions, AI Gateway, Data API). If you're a security lead, price Push Security; if you're shipping an app, price Neon. Buying both is a normal outcome, not a trade-off.
Multifactor vs Push Security
If your priority is defending against sophisticated browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijack) and controlling AI tool usage, choose Push Security. If you need a secure, shareable credential vault with granular access control for both humans and AI agents, Multifactor is the clear choice.
Cloudflare vs Push Security
These are not competitors. Push Security is a specialist browser-extension layer that stops AiTM, ClickFix, and consent-phishing attacks that slip past email gateways and SWGs, at a flat $5/user/month aimed at sub-500-seat teams. Cloudflare is a platform play: CDN, WAF, Workers, R2, and Zero Trust, sold to developers and security teams who want one bill. If your problem is phishing in the browser, buy Push. If your problem is deploying an API or agent on a global edge with DDoS protection, buy Cloudflare. Shortlisting both would only happen at a very large org where the browser extension fills a blind spot the Cloudflare SWG can't see — and even then, they're complements, not substitutes.
Openbrowserclaw vs Push Security
If you're an enterprise security team fighting AiTM phishing and shadow AI, Push Security is a must-have — its agentic threat hunting and real-time controls are unmatched. For a privacy-focused individual who wants an offline AI assistant without any infrastructure, Openbrowserclaw is perfect. Choose based on whether your priority is securing a workforce or empowering yourself locally.
Council vs Push Security
These aren't competitors, and a buyer shouldn't be choosing between them. Push Security buys a security team browser-layer defense against AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing — roughly $5/user/month, no endpoint agent or enterprise-browser migration, built for mid-market shops under 500 seats. Council is a free macOS app for one person who wants a panel of LLMs to answer, blind-critique each other, and return a divergence score. If your problem is phishing getting past email and SWG controls, Council can't help; if your problem is trusting a single model's reasoning, Push Security is irrelevant. Budget the ~$5/seat for the security team and install Council on your own Mac for free.
Alternatives to Push Security
View all
Island
Island is an enterprise browser and agentic control plane that builds Zero Trust security, SASE networking, and AI governance into Chromium
Securiti
Securiti unifies DSPM, privacy automation, and AI security for enterprises on its DataAI Command Platform.
Acronis Cyber Protect
AI-native cyber protection platform combining backup, disaster recovery, endpoint security, and RMM for MSPs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Push Security? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.