Holistic AI vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHolistic AIPush Security
PricingContact for pricingFreemium
Primary FocusEnterprise AI governance and complianceBrowser security for AI-era attacks
Key FeatureAI inventory, bias auditing, LLM red teaming, regulatory workflowsAiTM phishing detection, session hijacking, AI tool DLP
DeploymentCloud-based platform with integrationsCloud-based browser extension
Best ForRisk and compliance teams governing AI at scaleSecurity teams hardening browser-based identity and AI usage
Latest NewsRuntime agentic enforcement and programmable controls (Apr 2026)Agentic threat hunting pipeline (May 2026)

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage in real time, especially if you need a freemium entry point. Choose Holistic AI if you're an enterprise that needs comprehensive AI governance, bias audits, compliance workflows (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001), and runtime agent enforcement — and have budget for a contact-based pricing model.

Try Holistic AITry Push Security
Holistic AI
Holistic AI

Enterprise AI governance platform for discovery, risk testing, and automated compliance enforcement.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security for the AI era: detect and block AI-powered attacks.

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month (annual) or monthly per user
Custom
Popularity
8 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails📜 GRC & Compliance Automation
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
AI discovery across cloud, code, and SaaS
Real-time AI inventory monitoring
Shadow AI detection with risk scoring
One-click reconciliation for shadow AI
40+ risk tests (bias, safety, security, performance)
LLM red teaming and adversarial testing
Guardian Agents (Sentinel and Operative) for runtime enforcement
Programmable controls for automated governance
Compliance workflows (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001)
Automated audit trail and evidence collection
Runtime agentic enforcement (tool calling, access control)
Cost control for AI agents
Risk scoring mapped to regulatory frameworks
Deployment gates and kill switches
Integration with 20+ third-party tools
AitM / reverse-proxy phishing detection
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
AWS
Azure
Google Cloud Platform
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Databricks
Snowflake
Langsmith
Langfuse
CrewAI
Copilot Studio
ServiceNow
Zscaler
SharePoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Slack
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: Holistic AI vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Holistic AI

43 mentions across 4 sources · 31% positive — critical

Hacker News, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Research-backed foundation from UCL gives credibility.
  • • Supports major regulations: EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001.
  • • Automated shadow AI discovery across cloud, code, and SaaS.
  • • Guardian Agents for runtime enforcement of AI governance.

What frustrates them

  • • Very few real user reviews or detailed experiences found.
  • • Pricing is opaque; only contact-based, no transparent tiers.
  • • Setup and integration likely require significant effort.
  • • Smaller teams may find it overkill and expensive.

Researched Jul 6, 2026

Push Security

36 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Deploys as extension across all major browsers, avoiding enterprise lock-in
  • • Autonomous hunting agents detect and block zero-day threats in real time
  • • Addresses emerging AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and session hijacking attacks
  • • Provides shadow AI discovery and governance, a growing need

What frustrates them

  • • Limited independent reviews and community deployment case studies
  • • Extension-based agent may impact browser performance on low-end devices
  • • Pricing for advanced features likely steep for SMBs
  • • Configuration complexity requires skilled security engineers

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Solo security practitioner at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's freemium entry and focus on browser-based attack detection (AiTM, session hijacking, malicious OAuth) provide immediate value without large upfront cost. It also offers AI tool visibility, critical as employees adopt LLMs.

  • Enterprise compliance officer in a regulated industry (e.g., finance)
    Pick: Holistic AI

    Holistic AI's automated compliance workflows for EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001, and bias auditing are essential for regulatory readiness. Its shadow AI discovery and risk scoring help manage ungoverned AI use at scale.

  • ML engineering team deploying AI agents
    Pick: Holistic AI

    Holistic AI's runtime agentic enforcement (tool calling, access control) and LLM red teaming directly address agent security. Its integration with ML tools like Databricks and Langsmith fits engineering workflows.

  • CISO focused on identity and phishing threats from AI-driven attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's AiTM phishing detection, session hijacking blocks, and MFA guardrails directly counter evolving threats. Its browser telemetry enables swift detection of compromised tokens and ghost logins.

  • Startup with limited AI governance needs but growing AI usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's freemium model and AI tool DLP provide cost-effective guardrails for employee AI use. As the startup scales, it can later evaluate comprehensive governance platforms like Holistic AI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Holistic AI vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage in real time, especially if you need a freemium entry point. Choose Holistic AI if you're an enterprise that needs comprehensive AI governance, bias audits, compliance workflows (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001), and runtime agent enforcement — and have budget for a contact-based pricing model.

Can Push Security and Holistic AI be used together?

Yes, they are complementary. Push Security secures browser-level interactions with AI tools and detects browser-based attacks, while Holistic AI governs AI models and agents across the enterprise. Many organizations may benefit from deploying both.

Does Push Security offer AI model governance like bias auditing?

No, Push Security focuses on browser security, AI tool usage visibility, and data loss prevention for AI interactions. It does not provide AI model testing, bias auditing, or AI governance workflows.

Does Holistic AI detect browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing?

No, Holistic AI focuses on AI governance, risk monitoring, and compliance. It does not specialize in browser-based attack detection, session hijacking, or identity protection.

What regulatory standards does Holistic AI support?

Holistic AI supports EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, NYC Bias Audit, and more. It provides automated compliance workflows and audit trail generation.

Is Push Security free to start?

Yes, Push Security offers a freemium pricing model, allowing teams to access core browser security features at no cost.

Which tool is better for shadow AI detection?

Holistic AI specializes in shadow AI discovery with risk scoring and reconciliation, while Push Security detects shadow SaaS and ghost logins. For comprehensive shadow AI across cloud and code, Holistic AI is stronger.

Do both tools integrate with enterprise identity providers?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace. Holistic AI integrates with cloud platforms and ML tools but does not list direct identity integrations.

Which tool is more suitable for a small business?

Push Security's freemium model and focus on browser security make it more accessible for small businesses. Holistic AI's contact-based pricing and enterprise focus are better suited for larger organizations with dedicated AI governance budgets.

More Holistic AI or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Explore each tool further

Holistic AI
View Holistic AI reviewHolistic AI alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI GRC & Compliance Automation toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026