Holistic AI vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-08
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHolistic AIPush Security
PricingContact for pricingFreemium
Primary FocusEnterprise AI governance and complianceBrowser security for AI-era attacks
Key FeatureAI inventory, bias auditing, LLM red teaming, regulatory workflowsAiTM phishing detection, session hijacking, AI tool DLP
DeploymentCloud-based platform with integrationsCloud-based browser extension
Best ForRisk and compliance teams governing AI at scaleSecurity teams hardening browser-based identity and AI usage
Latest NewsRuntime agentic enforcement and programmable controls (Apr 2026)Agentic threat hunting pipeline (May 2026)

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage in real time, especially if you need a freemium entry point. Choose Holistic AI if you're an enterprise that needs comprehensive AI governance, bias audits, compliance workflows (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001), and runtime agent enforcement — and have budget for a contact-based pricing model.

Try Holistic AITry Push Security
Holistic AI
Holistic AI

Enterprise AI governance platform that discovers shadow AI, tests model risk, and enforces policy at runtime through Guardian Agents.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Paid
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
14 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails📜 GRC & Compliance Automation
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
AI discovery across cloud, code and SaaS environments
Shadow AI detection with risk scoring, staging and one-click reconciliation
Continuously synced enterprise AI inventory with owners and business purpose
Model, dataset and endpoint dependency lineage
Agent Graph tracing risk across agents, tools and data flows
40+ risk tests covering bias, safety, security, robustness and privacy
LLM red teaming for prompt injection and jailbreak attacks
Continuous drift and performance degradation monitoring
Guardian Agents: Sentinel monitoring and Operative enforcement
Runtime enforcement for agent tool calling, access control and cost control
Programmable controls for continuous governance policies
Deployment gates, approval workflows and human sign-off
Control mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, NYC Local Law 144
Audit trail with exportable compliance evidence
LLM Decision Hub for selecting AI models
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
AWS
Azure
Google Cloud Platform
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Databricks
Snowflake
Langsmith
Langfuse
CrewAI
Copilot Studio
ServiceNow
Zscaler
SharePoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: Holistic AI vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Holistic AI

43 mentions across 4 sources · 31% positive — critical (averaged across 4 sources)

Hacker News, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Research-backed foundation from UCL gives credibility.
  • • Supports major regulations: EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001.
  • • Automated shadow AI discovery across cloud, code, and SaaS.
  • • Guardian Agents for runtime enforcement of AI governance.

What frustrates them

  • • Very few real user reviews or detailed experiences found.
  • • Pricing is opaque; only contact-based, no transparent tiers.
  • • Setup and integration likely require significant effort.
  • • Smaller teams may find it overkill and expensive.

Researched Jul 6, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Solo security practitioner at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's freemium entry and focus on browser-based attack detection (AiTM, session hijacking, malicious OAuth) provide immediate value without large upfront cost. It also offers AI tool visibility, critical as employees adopt LLMs.

  • Enterprise compliance officer in a regulated industry (e.g., finance)
    Pick: Holistic AI

    Holistic AI's automated compliance workflows for EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001, and bias auditing are essential for regulatory readiness. Its shadow AI discovery and risk scoring help manage ungoverned AI use at scale.

  • ML engineering team deploying AI agents
    Pick: Holistic AI

    Holistic AI's runtime agentic enforcement (tool calling, access control) and LLM red teaming directly address agent security. Its integration with ML tools like Databricks and Langsmith fits engineering workflows.

  • CISO focused on identity and phishing threats from AI-driven attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's AiTM phishing detection, session hijacking blocks, and MFA guardrails directly counter evolving threats. Its browser telemetry enables swift detection of compromised tokens and ghost logins.

  • Startup with limited AI governance needs but growing AI usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's freemium model and AI tool DLP provide cost-effective guardrails for employee AI use. As the startup scales, it can later evaluate comprehensive governance platforms like Holistic AI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Holistic AI vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage in real time, especially if you need a freemium entry point. Choose Holistic AI if you're an enterprise that needs comprehensive AI governance, bias audits, compliance workflows (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001), and runtime agent enforcement — and have budget for a contact-based pricing model.

Can Push Security and Holistic AI be used together?

Yes, they are complementary. Push Security secures browser-level interactions with AI tools and detects browser-based attacks, while Holistic AI governs AI models and agents across the enterprise. Many organizations may benefit from deploying both.

Does Push Security offer AI model governance like bias auditing?

No, Push Security focuses on browser security, AI tool usage visibility, and data loss prevention for AI interactions. It does not provide AI model testing, bias auditing, or AI governance workflows.

Does Holistic AI detect browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing?

No, Holistic AI focuses on AI governance, risk monitoring, and compliance. It does not specialize in browser-based attack detection, session hijacking, or identity protection.

What regulatory standards does Holistic AI support?

Holistic AI supports EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, NYC Bias Audit, and more. It provides automated compliance workflows and audit trail generation.

Is Push Security free to start?

Yes, Push Security offers a freemium pricing model, allowing teams to access core browser security features at no cost.

Which tool is better for shadow AI detection?

Holistic AI specializes in shadow AI discovery with risk scoring and reconciliation, while Push Security detects shadow SaaS and ghost logins. For comprehensive shadow AI across cloud and code, Holistic AI is stronger.

Do both tools integrate with enterprise identity providers?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace. Holistic AI integrates with cloud platforms and ML tools but does not list direct identity integrations.

Which tool is more suitable for a small business?

Push Security's freemium model and focus on browser security make it more accessible for small businesses. Holistic AI's contact-based pricing and enterprise focus are better suited for larger organizations with dedicated AI governance budgets.

More Holistic AI or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Explore each tool further

Holistic AI
View Holistic AI reviewHolistic AI alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI GRC & Compliance Automation toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026