Sentry vs Push Security

The two products don't overlap on a single capability, which is exactly why they shouldn't be shortlisted against each other. Push Security lives in the browser and defends against attacks that target the user's session: behavioral phishing detection, AiTM reverse-proxy detection and real-time blocking, cloned-login and Browser-in-the-Browser detection, ClickFix clipboard-injection blocking, device-code phishing kits that bypass passkeys, and consent phishing via malicious OAuth integrations. It also covers malicious browser extensions (detection, risk scoring, allowlisting), agentic browsers like Comet, Atlas, and Dia, and ghost-login detection for SSO bypass and password fallback paths. On the AI side, it monitors prompts and data inputs, blocks clipboard use, flags AI file uploads, reviews AI OAuth/agent permissions, and discovers shadow AI apps with policy enforcement. Sentry is developer observability: error monitoring with stack traces and alerts, distributed tracing across services and spans, session replay, logs with JSONL/CSV export, application and custom business metrics, continuous and UI profiling, cron and uptime monitoring, and agent tracing for AI workflows, plus Seer for root-cause analysis, Autofix merge-ready patches, and AI Code Review that correlates PRs against error and performance history. Push's integrations point at Okta, Google Workspace, M365, Sentinel, Splunk, Datadog, and Slack; Sentry's point at GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear, Vercel, Cloudflare, Slack, and PagerDuty. One secures the browser session; the other explains why code failed in production.

Both are freemium, but the cost drivers are different enough that you can't line them up side by side. Push Security is positioned for mid-market security teams under 500 seats at a predictable $5/user/month, with the extension as the delivery mechanism — meaning no enterprise browser migration and no endpoint agent rollout cost to absorb. For a 300-person org that's roughly $1,500/month of predictable, per-seat security spend. Sentry's freemium model is usage-based rather than per-seat: you can consolidate onto the free Developer plan with real error search, but high-volume event ingestion gets expensive because overages bill per event and per GB. Sentry also calls out that Seer, its AI debugging agent, is a separate subscription — so teams who want AI-assisted root cause and Autofix should budget above the base plan rather than assuming it's bundled. On the security side, the notable gap is that Push doesn't replace an email security gateway, and it isn't full endpoint DLP outside browser data flows, so it's additive to controls you may already pay for. Net: Push is a per-seat line item with a clear ceiling; Sentry is a consumption line item that scales with your event volume and AI add-ons. Different cost curves, different owners.