Amplitude vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAmplitudePush Security
CategoryProduct analytics, experimentation & feature flags (product/growth)Browser-based phishing defense + shadow AI control (security)
Primary buyerProduct, growth, data, and marketing teamsSecurity and identity teams
Pricing modelFreemium; every plan includes full platform and unlimited seats, paid tiers are event-basedFreemium; cited at $5/user/month for mid-market teams under 500 seats
DeliveryWeb/mobile SDK instrumentation; no per-seat cost; SSO and RBAC on paid tiersLightweight browser extension across popular browsers; no endpoint agent, no browser migration
Flagship capabilityGlobal Agent natural-language queries, Agent Analytics, MCP server for Claude/CursorReal-time blocking of AiTM, ClickFix, device code, and consent phishing; shadow AI inventory
Notable integrationsSlack, Notion, GitHub, Cursor, Claude, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Replit, Codex, Gemini, FigmaOkta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365/Teams, Sentinel, Datadog, Splunk, SentinelOne, Slack, REST API
Amplitude
Amplitude

Amplitude is a product analytics platform with an MCP server, Global Agent, and Agent Analytics that let AI query your product data where

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
Starts at $0
Custom
Custom
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
13 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Beginner-friendly
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
Web
Categories
📉 Product Analytics & Experimentation🧮 Business Intelligence
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Global Agent: plain-language AI queries across all Amplitude data, resolving 76% of customer issues on average
Agent Analytics: 5,000 monthly agent sessions on Free, trace analysis, semantic filtering, topic clustering
Amplitude MCP server for querying insights from Claude, Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Replit, Codex,
Consolidated MCP tools on the Platform, shipped 2026-08-17
Data Assistant Agent for data-related workflows, shipped 2026-08-13
Session Replay with event and network context, AI-based summaries, targeted capture, and data masking
AI Feedback: turns user comments from any channel into cohorts (2,000 records on Free)
Feature Experimentation: feature flags, A/B/n testing, holdout groups, cohort and behavior targeting
Web Experimentation: visual A/B tests, custom code editor, version history, image upload, cookie consent management
Feature Management: unlimited feature flags with flag-level access controls
Heatmaps and Zoning Insights for click, scroll, and page-region engagement
Action Guides and Surveys: multiple triggers per guide, embeddable directly in mobile apps
Marketing Analytics with campaign reporting, two channel views on Free and Plus, and cohort syncs to ad platforms
Data Governance: tracking plans, schema validation on ingest, and Autocapture
Experiment scheduling for pre-set stop times, shipped 2026-09-01
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
OAuth consent monitoring, consent blocking and app removal
Session hijacking and credential attack detection
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring with AI clipboard monitoring and blocking
AI file upload monitoring plus AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring
AI usage policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block
Browser DLP with file download, upload and clipboard telemetry and blocking
Integrations
Slack
Notion
GitHub
GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Claude
Claude Code
Windsurf
Replit
Codex
Gemini
Figma
Make
Lovable
Twilio Segment
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne

What real users say: Amplitude vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Amplitude

116 mentions across 7 sources · 26% positive — critical (averaged across 7 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, Stack Overflow, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • AI Agents for 24/7 issue detection and optimization
  • • MCP integration with Cursor, Claude, and other AI coding tools
  • • AI Feedback extracts qualitative sentiment and actions
  • • Session replay tied to event-based analysis

What frustrates them

  • • Pricing jumps from $15 free to thousands—hard for small teams
  • • Tracks clicks well but lacks depth for conversational AI analytics
  • • Community feedback is extremely sparse and unreliable
  • • Name confusion with AmplitudeJS and audio amplitude

Researched Jul 26, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
  • • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
  • • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
  • • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing

What frustrates them

  • • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
  • • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
  • • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
  • • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes

Researched Oct 14, 2026

Feature-by-feature

The feature sets share almost no vocabulary. Push Security lives in the browser: behavioral phishing detection, AiTM reverse-proxy detection, cloned login and Browser-in-the-Browser detection, ClickFix clipboard-injection blocking, device code phishing blocking, consent phishing and malicious OAuth integration detection, malicious browser extension detection with risk scoring and allowlisting, and ghost login detection for SSO bypass. Its AI side is defensive — prompt and data-input monitoring with clipboard blocking, AI file upload monitoring, AI OAuth/agent permission review, detection of agentic browsers like Comet, Atlas, and Dia, plus shadow AI app discovery and policy enforcement.

Amplitude's features are measurement and experimentation: behavioral cohorts, funnels, and conversion drivers; Session Replay with event and network context; Heatmaps and Zoning Insights; Feature Experimentation (A/B/n tied to flags), Web Experimentation, and Feature Management with unlimited flags and flag-level access control; Action Guides and Surveys; Marketing Analytics.

Its AI layer queries product data rather than blocking attacks — Global Agent for natural-language questions, Agent Analytics for measuring how AI agent experiences affect retention and revenue, and an MCP server that puts Amplitude insights inside Claude, Cursor, and other editors. Its integrations run to Slack, Notion, GitHub, Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Replit, Codex, Gemini, and Figma; Push's run to Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365/Teams, Sentinel, Datadog, Splunk, SentinelOne, and Slack. One tool inspects the login; the other inspects the funnel.

Pricing compared

Both are freemium, but they meter completely different things. Push Security is per-user: the stated fit is mid-market security teams under 500 seats needing phishing defense at a predictable $5/user/month. That means cost scales with headcount, so a 400-person company can model it roughly as seat count times the per-user rate, and the browser-extension deployment means no enterprise browser license or endpoint agent to budget for separately.

Amplitude charges by events, not seats — every plan includes the full platform and unlimited seats, which is a different purchasing conversation entirely. The stated risk in the data is that free-tier teams hit event-based Growth or Enterprise pricing once they outgrow Free. So the two budgets do not compete for the same line item: Push sits in the security tool budget alongside Okta and your email gateway; Amplitude sits in the product/growth tool budget. The realistic caveat for each is the same shape — free tiers get you started, the paid jump is where the decision is made — but there is no scenario where a buyer swaps one of these for the other to save money. They are bought by different departments for different jobs.

Who should pick which

  • Security team seeing AiTM or ClickFix phishing slip past email and SWG controls
    Pick: Push Security

    Its core coverage is exactly those browser-level techniques: AiTM reverse-proxy detection, ClickFix clipboard-injection blocking, device code phishing, and cloned-login/BitB detection, delivered in the browser where the gateway never sees it.

  • Identity team hunting ghost logins and password fallback paths that bypass SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Ghost login detection for SSO bypass and password fallback, plus consent phishing and malicious OAuth integration detection, target the identity gaps an Okta deployment alone leaves open.

  • Product team that needs to know where users get stuck and whether a change fixed it
    Pick: Amplitude

    Funnels, conversion drivers, Session Replay, and Feature/Web Experimentation tied to flags is the full measure-then-test loop; recent releases add experiment stop scheduling and cookie consent management for Web Experiment.

  • Team shipping an AI agent that must prove retention and revenue impact
    Pick: Amplitude

    Agent Analytics is purpose-built for measuring AI agent experiences, and Global Agent plus the consolidated MCP tools let engineers query those insights from inside Claude, Cursor, or Discord.

  • Company that must inventory shadow AI apps and control prompts, clipboard use, and LLM file uploads
    Pick: Push Security

    Shadow AI app discovery, AI usage policy enforcement, prompt and data-input monitoring with clipboard blocking, and AI file upload monitoring with OAuth/agent permission review are its explicit AI-governance surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I replace one of these with the other?

No. Push Security blocks browser-based attacks and governs AI usage in the browser; Amplitude measures product behavior and runs experiments. Nothing in either feature list covers the other's job.

Do both require heavy setup?

Push is a browser extension across popular browsers with no endpoint agent and no enterprise browser migration. Amplitude requires event instrumentation, and its own stated downside is that for pre-seed teams with no instrumentation budget the setup time exceeds the value.

Push Security says it detects agentic browsers — does that mean it monitors AI agents the way Amplitude's Agent Analytics does?

No, and the direction is opposite. Push detects agentic browsers (Comet, Atlas, Dia) as a security signal and reviews AI OAuth/agent permissions. Amplitude's Agent Analytics measures how your own AI agent experiences affect retention and revenue.

Which one has per-seat pricing?

Push Security. Its stated mid-market fit is $5/user/month under 500 seats. Amplitude is event-based and every plan includes unlimited seats, so its cost does not track headcount.

What does Amplitude's MCP server do that Push's REST API doesn't?

They serve different consumers. Push's REST API feeds security telemetry into tools like Splunk, Datadog, and Sentinel. Amplitude's MCP server lets Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients query product insights directly, now via consolidated Platform endpoints.

If I only have budget for one, how do I decide?

Decide by threat, not by tool comparison. If phishing, SSO bypass, or ungoverned AI usage is your exposure, buy Push. If you cannot tell why users churn or whether your last release helped, buy Amplitude.

More Amplitude or Push Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: September 26, 2026