VibeGuard vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionVibeGuardPush Security
PricingFree (open-source)Freemium
Primary FocusPrivacy for AI coding assistantsBrowser security for AI era
DeploymentLocal MITM proxyCloud-based browser extension
Target UsersDevelopersSecurity and identity teams
Key IntegrationsClaude, Cursor, Codex, GPT, GeminiOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest NewsNo recent newsCoined poisoned tenant attack; SaaS maturity model; agentic threat hunting pipeline

For enterprise security teams needing broad browser threat detection (AiTM phishing, session hijacking) and AI tool governance, Push Security is the clear choice with its cloud-based extension and agentic hunting. Individual developers or small teams wanting to protect sensitive data in AI coding assistants will find VibeGuard's open-source, zero-friction local proxy perfect—no enterprise overhead needed. Choose Push for organizational control, VibeGuard for lightweight developer privacy.

Try VibeGuardTry Push Security
VibeGuard
VibeGuard

Open-source local MITM proxy that redacts secrets from your AI coding assistant requests and restores them in responses.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
9 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
DesktopCLI
Web
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy💻 Code & Development
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Zero-config defaults—works out of the box without editing YAML
Process-level proxy that only intercepts traffic from launched processes
Built-in process launcher (vibeguard claude / cursor / codex)
Hot-reload rule editing via the admin UI without restarting the proxy
Encrypted storage of keyword-to-placeholder mappings using your local CA key
Multi-layer detection: rule lists, keyword matching, regex, and optional NER
Automatic redaction of sensitive values in requests and restoration in responses
Real-time audit log in the admin dashboard
Visual analytics in the admin dashboard
Rule management from the browser-based admin panel
One-line install for macOS, Linux, and Windows (PowerShell)
Automatic CA certificate trust setup via `vibeguard trust`
Placeholder format such as __VG_key_9d2e for redacted values
Local execution with no external data collection
Uninstall command with a purge option
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
OAuth consent monitoring, consent blocking and app removal
Session hijacking and credential attack detection
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring with AI clipboard monitoring and blocking
AI file upload monitoring plus AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring
AI usage policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block
Browser DLP with file download, upload and clipboard telemetry and blocking
Integrations
Claude
Cursor
Codex
GPT
Gemini
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack

What real users say: VibeGuard vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

VibeGuard

16 mentions across 4 sources · 55% positive — mixed (averaged across 4 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, GitHub

What users praise

  • • Zero-config out-of-box defaults make setup effortless and quick.
  • • Extremely lightweight — claims only 1% memory usage.
  • • Process-level interception means only targeted apps are filtered.
  • • Multi-layer detection (keywords, regex, NER) catches varied sensitive data.

What frustrates them

  • • Can't intercept local AI gateway traffic on 127.0.0.1.
  • • No global transparent proxy mode — easy to forget wrapping command.
  • • WebSocket mode unsupported, leaving Codex CLI unprotected.
  • • Lacks ability to force-block specific file reads like .env.

Researched Aug 4, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
  • • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
  • • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
  • • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing

What frustrates them

  • • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
  • • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
  • • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
  • • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes

Researched Oct 14, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Enterprise security team
    Pick: Push Security

    Detects browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, session hijacking) and secures AI tool usage with DLP and visibility—critical for large organizations.

  • Individual developer
    Pick: VibeGuard

    Lightweight, free, open-source proxy that redacts API keys and IPs from coding assistant traffic without enterprise overhead.

  • Identity team
    Pick: Push Security

    Hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA guardrails and detects ghost logins, integrating with Okta and Azure AD.

  • Privacy-conscious startup
    Pick: VibeGuard

    Zero cost, process-level control, and transparent open-source code ensure no sensitive data leaks to AI APIs.

  • SOC analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry and real-time blocking of advanced attacks provides automated detection response.

Frequently Asked Questions

VibeGuard vs Push Security: which should you choose?

For enterprise security teams needing broad browser threat detection (AiTM phishing, session hijacking) and AI tool governance, Push Security is the clear choice with its cloud-based extension and agentic hunting. Individual developers or small teams wanting to protect sensitive data in AI coding assistants will find VibeGuard's open-source, zero-friction local proxy perfect—no enterprise overhead needed. Choose Push for organizational control, VibeGuard for lightweight developer privacy.

Can VibeGuard protect against phishing attacks?

No, VibeGuard only redacts sensitive data in AI coding assistant traffic; it does not detect or block phishing.

Is Push Security an enterprise browser?

No, it works across all major browsers via an extension, without requiring migration to a single browser.

Does VibeGuard require cloud infrastructure?

No, it runs locally as a proxy on macOS, Linux, or Windows with one-line install.

Can Push Security control AI tool usage?

Yes, it provides real-time AI tool visibility and enforces policies on clipboard, file uploads, and OAuth grants.

Is VibeGuard suitable for non-developers?

No, it targets developers using AI coding assistants and requires command-line usage.

Does Push Security offer on-premises deployment?

No, it is cloud-based only.

Can VibeGuard redact data from non-coding AI tools?

No, it is specifically designed for coding assistants like Claude and Cursor.

Does Push Security detect ghost logins?

Yes, it discovers shadow SaaS and ghost logins via browser telemetry.

More VibeGuard or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

VibeGuard
View VibeGuard reviewVibeGuard alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Code & Development tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026