Gateway vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Gateway | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | freemium · from Free Forever $0/mo | freemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly) |
| Best for | Platform teams managing AI access across an organization, Developers building LLM-powered apps needing reliability and observability | Security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption |
| Standout features | Unified API for 1600+ LLMs across providers · Smart routing with fallbacks, load balancing, canary testing · Deterministic and LLM-based guardrails | Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block |
| Viability score | 77/100 | 95/100 |
| API | Yes | Yes |
Gateway is the stronger pick for platform teams managing ai access across an organization; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).
Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-06.
Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- Security team leaderPick: Push Security
Concerned about AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and employees feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT. Push Security provides real-time in-browser detection and block, plus shadow SaaS discovery.
- Platform engineer managing AI stackPick: Gateway
Needs to route to multiple LLMs, enforce guardrails, cache responses, and monitor spend across teams. Gateway offers unified API, smart routing, and observability.
- CISO evaluating AI securityPick: Push Security
Pressured to secure both AI tool adoption and identity attacks. Push Security's browser telemetry covers both, with agentic threat hunting as force multiplier.
- DevOps deploying AI agents in productionPick: Gateway
Needs agent governance via MCP Gateway, request/response monitoring, and cost control across agents. Gateway's latest MCP governance features fit directly.
- Identity manager reducing shadow MFAPick: Push Security
Push Security provides in-browser MFA registration guardrails and detects ghost logins, helping harden unmanaged identities across any browser.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Gateway or Push Security?
The best choice between Gateway and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.
What are the main differences between Gateway and Push Security?
The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.
Is there a free version of Gateway or Push Security?
Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.
More Gateway or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.