Gateway vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Gateway | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Unified API gateway for 1600+ LLMs with routing, guardrails, observability | Browser security against AiTM phishing, session hijacking, AI data loss |
| Key Differentiator | MCP Gateway for agent governance and multi-provider LLM routing | Autonomous threat hunting agents using browser telemetry |
| Deployment | Cloud proxy or self-hosted open-source core | Cloud-based browser extension (multi-browser) |
| Ideal For | Platform teams managing LLM access, cost, and reliability | Security teams fighting browser-based attacks and shadow AI |
| Integration Ecosystem | 1600+ LLMs across 250+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, etc.) | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
Portkey's AI Gateway routes, secures, and observes 3000+ LLMs through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
Visit Website
Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Gateway vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Gateway
No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Jul 3, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Gateway”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
- • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
- • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
- • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast
What frustrates them
- • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
- • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
- • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
- • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues
Researched Oct 7, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team leaderPick: Push Security
Concerned about AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and employees feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT. Push Security provides real-time in-browser detection and block, plus shadow SaaS discovery.
- Platform engineer managing AI stackPick: Gateway
Needs to route to multiple LLMs, enforce guardrails, cache responses, and monitor spend across teams. Gateway offers unified API, smart routing, and observability.
- CISO evaluating AI securityPick: Push Security
Pressured to secure both AI tool adoption and identity attacks. Push Security's browser telemetry covers both, with agentic threat hunting as force multiplier.
- DevOps deploying AI agents in productionPick: Gateway
Needs agent governance via MCP Gateway, request/response monitoring, and cost control across agents. Gateway's latest MCP governance features fit directly.
- Identity manager reducing shadow MFAPick: Push Security
Push Security provides in-browser MFA registration guardrails and detects ghost logins, helping harden unmanaged identities across any browser.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Push Security and Gateway together?
Yes. They solve different problems: Push Security secures the browser, Gateway secures LLM API calls. Using both gives comprehensive AI security coverage.
Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?
No. It works as a browser extension across Chrome, Edge, Firefox, etc., without forcing a browser migration.
Does Gateway support on-premises deployment?
Yes. Its open-source core can be self-hosted; the cloud version is also available.
Which tool is better for AI agent safety?
Gateway's MCP Gateway is explicitly designed for agent governance (see news). Push Security focuses on human browsing, not agent-to-LLM comms.
Which tool detects shadow SaaS?
Push Security detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS via browser telemetry. Gateway does not.
Does either tool offer a free trial?
Both have freemium tiers. Push Security requires contacting sales for full features; Gateway has a free tier with limitations.
Which tool integrates with Okta?
Push Security integrates directly with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace. Gateway integrates via SSO but not identity-specific features.
Which tool is cheaper?
Gateway's free tier is generous for low volume. Push Security's pricing likely higher per-user. Budget depends on number of users vs API calls.
More Gateway or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026