Casdoor vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-18
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCasdoorPush Security
Pricingfreefreemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forEnterprises adopting AI agents who need identity and access management with MCP support, Teams building SaaS platforms requiring integrated billing and authSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresBuilt-in MCP server with Streamable HTTP for AI agent management · OAuth 2.1 with Dynamic Client Registration and per-tool permissions · Agent-to-agent secure authenticationAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score80/10095/100
APIYesYes

Casdoor is the stronger pick for enterprises adopting ai agents who need identity and access management with mcp support; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-18.

Casdoor
Casdoor

Open-source AI-native IAM with MCP server and OAuth 2.1 for agents.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPI
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy⚙️ Developer Infrastructure
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Built-in MCP server with Streamable HTTP for AI agent management
OAuth 2.1 with Dynamic Client Registration and per-tool permissions
Agent-to-agent secure authentication
Supports OAuth 2.0, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuthn, TOTP, MFA, Face ID
100+ identity providers (Google Workspace, Azure AD, etc.)
OpenClaw agent for LLM observability (traces, metrics, logs via OTLP)
SaaS management with billing plans, pricing tiers, payment providers
Web UI for managing users, applications, permissions
Horizontal scalability with frontend-backend separation
Single Sign-On (SSO) for multiple applications
User authentication workflows and login customization
Integrates with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code Copilot
Full audit trail of agent activity via OpenClaw entries
Part of CNCF Cloud Native Landscape
Online demo and community support (Discord, Stack Overflow)
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
Google Workspace
Azure AD
MCP
OpenClaw
Claude Desktop
Cursor
Windsurf
VS Code
GitHub Copilot
Discord
Stack Overflow
Google Groups
Okta
Slack
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • Security Operations Center (SOC) analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time browser telemetry and agentic threat hunting for AiTM, session hijacking, and AI data leakage, which are direct SOC concerns.

  • Enterprise architect building AI agent workflows
    Pick: Casdoor

    Casdoor's native MCP server and OAuth 2.1 support enable secure authentication and authorization for AI agents, including per-tool permissions and agent-to-agent auth.

  • Identity team enforcing MFA/SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Push's in-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails help harden unmanaged identities without forcing a browser change.

  • SaaS platform builder with integrated billing
    Pick: Casdoor

    Casdoor includes SaaS management with plans, pricing tiers, and payment providers, reducing the need for separate billing infrastructure.

  • Organizations needing open-source IAM
    Pick: Casdoor

    Casdoor is fully open source and free, with no vendor lock-in, and now recognized in the CNCF landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Casdoor or Push Security?

The best choice between Casdoor and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Casdoor and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Casdoor or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Casdoor or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Casdoor
View Casdoor reviewCasdoor alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Developer Infrastructure tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.