Osmedeus vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-22
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionOsmedeusPush Security
PricingFree and open-sourceFreemium (paid tiers start at undisclosed price)
Primary UseSecurity automation: reconnaissance, scanning, workflow orchestrationBrowser security: AiTM phishing, AI data loss, shadow SaaS
DeploymentLocal, Docker, SSH, distributed via RedisCloud-based, browser extension
AI IntegrationBuilt-in AI agents and LLM-powered actions in workflowsAI tool visibility and control; agentic threat hunting
Target AudiencePenetration testers, red teamers, bug bounty huntersSecurity teams, identity teams, SOC analysts
Latest NewsNo recent news2026 articles on poisoned tenant attack, AI security maturity, EDR gaps

Choose Push Security if your priority is defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in your organization; it fills a gap left by EDR solutions. Choose Osmedeus if you need a flexible, open-source orchestration engine to automate reconnaissance and scanning workflows. They are complementary: Push secures the browser endpoint while Osmedeus automates offensive security tasks.

Osmedeus
Osmedeus

Osmedeus is a declarative YAML orchestration engine for security automation, reconnaissance, and vulnerability scanning workflows.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
7 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebCLI
Web
Categories
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🤖 Automation & Agents
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Declarative YAML workflow definitions for reconnaissance and scanning pipelines
Flexible execution: local, Docker, SSH, or distributed via Redis workers
Smart orchestration with conditions, events, scheduling, and parallel execution
Dependency management between modules with depends_on ordering
Decision routing with switch/case, goto, and on_success export actions
Extensible automation via templates, utilities, plugins, and HTTP steps
Built-in AI agents and LLM-powered actions for in-run decisions
Web UI for visualizing workflows, assets, and execution state
Asset management with result export to your existing stack
Run workflows via CLI, API, cron, or event triggers
One-command install script for quick setup
Workflow composition across bash, Docker, SSH, and agent module types
Parameterized workflows with named params and default values
Target fan-out: one target across multiple modules into a single workspace
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
ConsentFix and malicious OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Session hijacking, credential attack and URL blocking with custom detection rules
Mail forwarding rule monitoring for Microsoft 365 and Google
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring, removal and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring, AI clipboard monitoring and blocking, AI file upload monitoring
AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring plus AI usage policy enforcement
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block, with screenshot capture
Ghost login detection, non-SSO login visibility, MFA guardrails and shared account detection
Integrations
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack

Who should pick which

  • Security Operations Analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time detection and response for browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) that EDRs miss, plus agentic threat hunting—directly relevant for SOC workflows.

  • Penetration Tester
    Pick: Osmedeus

    Osmedeus automates reconnaissance and scanning pipelines via YAML workflows, saving time on repetitive tasks with flexible execution modes (local, Docker, SSH).

  • Identity Security Manager
    Pick: Push Security

    Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails, detects shadow SaaS and ghost logins, and integrates with Okta/Azure AD.

  • Bug Bounty Hunter
    Pick: Osmedeus

    Osmedeus is designed for large-scope scanning with distributed execution and modular workflows—ideal for managing multiple targets efficiently.

  • CISO Evaluating AI Security
    Pick: Push Security

    Push offers AI tool inventory, usage policies, and data loss prevention for LLMs, plus compliance support per recent articles on AI regulation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Osmedeus vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your priority is defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in your organization; it fills a gap left by EDR solutions. Choose Osmedeus if you need a flexible, open-source orchestration engine to automate reconnaissance and scanning workflows. They are complementary: Push secures the browser endpoint while Osmedeus automates offensive security tasks.

Can Push Security replace an EDR?

No, Push focuses on browser telemetry and browser-based attacks, complementing EDR rather than replacing it. Its recent article highlights EDR gaps for browser-side threats.

Does Osmedeus require coding?

Osmedeus uses declarative YAML for workflows, which is markup—not full coding—but familiarity with YAML and security tools is needed. Beginners may find it complex.

Is Push Security suitable for small businesses?

Push is best for organizations with significant browser attack surface and AI usage; small businesses may find the feature set too broad for their needs.

Can Osmedeus be used for non-security automation?

It is designed for security automation (recon, scanning). While YAML workflows could theoretically be repurposed, it lacks general automation features.

Does Push Security block malicious browser extensions?

Yes, it detects and blocks malicious browser extensions as part of its feature set.

What integrations does Osmedeus have?

Osmedeus documentation doesn't list specific integrations; it focuses on extensibility via plugins, HTTP steps, and community workflows.

Does Push Security support mobile phishing detection?

Yes, it detects mobile phishing via SMS/QR codes, as per features.

Can Osmedeus run in the cloud?

It can run on remote servers via SSH or distributed via Redis workers, but is not a managed cloud service like Push.

More Osmedeus or Push Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026