ScreenMind vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-15
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionScreenMindPush Security
PricingFree (open-source, no paid tiers)Freemium (free tier + paid plans; pricing undisclosed)
FocusLocal screen memory & AI assistant (privacy-first)Browser security (AiTM, AI tool control, identity)
DeploymentmacOS desktop app (Apple Silicon or AMD GPU with 4GB+ VRAM)Browser extension + telemetry (multi-browser)
AI ModelGemma 4 (Google, open-weight) – fully localProprietary models (no specific model disclosed)
Key IntegrationMCP Server → Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Obsidian, Slack, DiscordOkta, Azure AD, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Privacy100% local (AES encryption, zero telemetry)Cloud-based (telemetry sent to Push cloud)

If your priority is browser security – blocking AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS, and AI data leaks – Push Security is the clear choice. But if you need private, on-device screen memory for personal productivity and recall, ScreenMind is a groundbreaking free tool. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you're securing a workforce or augmenting your own memory.

Try ScreenMindTry Push Security
ScreenMind
ScreenMind

Free local screen memory with AI — privacy-first Microsoft Recall alternative

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser threat detection and AI security governance for the AI era.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month (annual)
Custom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
DesktopCLI
WebPlugin
Categories
📝 Notes & Knowledge Management💾 Local & On-Device AI
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Content-change screen capture with pHash dedup and idle detection
Gemma 4 vision analysis: app detection, activity, mood, layout
Hybrid semantic (MiniLM) + FTS5 keyword search
Conversational RAG chat with follow-up support and vision fallback
Voice memos with native Gemma 4 audio transcription (Ctrl+Shift+V)
Meeting transcription for Zoom, Teams, Google Meet with summaries
Analytics dashboard: category breakdown, top apps, hourly heatmap, focus metrics
Day Rewind timelapse with play/pause/scrub/speed controls
Three analysis modes: Accurate (~76s), Balanced (~40s), Fast (~12s)
Per-app pHash cache with 3-tier caching and app-aware staleness
Chat-first GPU priority — cancels in-flight analysis in <1s
Auto-pause for heavy apps (games, video editors, 3D software)
Sensitive data redaction (credit cards, SSNs, API keys, passwords)
AES encryption at rest (Fernet + OS keyring) and dashboard PIN lock
Incognito mode one-click pause
AiTM phishing detection and blocking
ClickFix and clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
Claude Desktop
Cursor
VS Code
Obsidian
Notion
Slack
Discord
IFTTT
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: ScreenMind vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

ScreenMind

21 mentions across 5 sources · 73% positive

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub

What users praise

  • • 100% local – no cloud dependency or telemetry at all.
  • • Free and open-source (MIT license) – no subscription or hidden fees.
  • • Uses Gemma 4 with vision, audio, and reasoning on-device.
  • • Smart content-change capture avoids pointless screenshots.

What frustrates them

  • • Linux Wayland capture is completely broken for many users.
  • • Frequently misidentifies applications as VSCode or Programming.
  • • Only captures main screen on multi-monitor setups.
  • • No Windows multi-monitor support confirmed.

Researched Jul 26, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 47% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Agentic threat hunting reduces analyst workload.
  • • Broad browser support avoids proprietary browser lock-in.
  • • Real-time detection blocks AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking.
  • • Shadow AI discovery and control are timely for AI adoption.

What frustrates them

  • • Not a full DLP or EDR replacement; pairs with endpoint tools.
  • • Community feedback is sparse, making it hard to validate claims.
  • • Pricing details are vague, only 'freemium' with unclear tiers.
  • • Advanced features may require security expertise to configure.

Researched Aug 13, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team lead
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security directly addresses modern browser threats like AiTM phishing, malicious OAuth, and AI data leakage. Its integration with identity providers and SIEMs fits enterprise security workflows.

  • Privacy-conscious knowledge worker
    Pick: ScreenMind

    ScreenMind offers 100% local, encrypted screen memory with no cloud dependencies. Perfect for users who want searchable records of their work without sacrificing privacy.

  • Developer building automations
    Pick: ScreenMind

    ScreenMind's MCP Server and Agent platform allow developers to query screen history from tools like Claude Desktop, VS Code, and Cursor – enabling custom automation on past activity.

  • Identity & access manager
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security hardens unmanaged identities, detects ghost logins, and enforces MFA/SSO – critical for identity security in organizations with diverse identity providers.

  • Meeting-heavy researcher
    Pick: ScreenMind

    ScreenMind provides local transcription for Zoom/Teams/Meet, and its RAG chat lets you ask about specific discussions without cloud transcription risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

ScreenMind vs Push Security: which should you choose?

If your priority is browser security – blocking AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS, and AI data leaks – Push Security is the clear choice. But if you need private, on-device screen memory for personal productivity and recall, ScreenMind is a groundbreaking free tool. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you're securing a workforce or augmenting your own memory.

Which tool is better for AI tool governance?

Push Security is specialized for AI tool visibility and policy enforcement. It detects AI usage, blocks data leakage, and enforces policies in real time. ScreenMind does not manage AI tools; it uses AI to analyze your screen.

Can ScreenMind replace Microsoft Recall?

Yes, as a privacy-first alternative – it stores data locally, does not phone home, and uses open-weight Gemma 4. Unlike Recall, it has no cloud sync, but offers voice memos, meeting transcription, and MCP integration.

Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?

No. Push works as a browser extension on any Chromium or Firefox-based browser. It does not require switching to a single-vendor enterprise browser like Island or Talon.

Is ScreenMind cross-platform?

Currently macOS only. Windows and Linux users need to wait or use alternatives. Push Security works on any OS where the supported browsers run.

How does Push Security detect AiTM phishing?

It monitors browser telemetry for adversary-in-the-middle patterns, such as credential harvesting proxies, and blocks the attacker in real time before credentials are stolen.

Can ScreenMind be used without a GPU?

No, it requires a 4GB+ GPU (Apple M-series or AMD) to run Gemma 4 locally. Intel integrated graphics are not supported.

Which tool integrates with enterprise identity providers?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, and more. ScreenMind has no identity integration – it's a personal tool.

Do either of them offer cloud backup?

Push Security is cloud-connected by design (telemetry sent to its cloud). ScreenMind is fully local with no cloud sync; backups are manual.

More ScreenMind or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Explore each tool further

ScreenMind
View ScreenMind reviewScreenMind alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Notes & Knowledge Management toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Local & On-Device AI toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: June 18, 2026