ScreenMind vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | ScreenMind | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source, MIT license) | Contact sales (likely enterprise) |
| Deployment | Desktop app (local, self-hosted) | Browser extension (proprietary) |
| Core Use Case | Personal screen memory and AI copilot (local, privacy-first) | Enterprise browser security (stop attacks, secure AI, prevent data loss) |
| AI Models | Google Gemma 4 (vision, audio, analysis) | Proprietary behavioral AI for attack detection |
| Key Features | Screen capture, semantic search, chat with memory, meeting transcription, voice memos, day rewind, analytics dashboard, sensitive data redaction | AiTM proxy blocking, ClickFix attack prevention, OAuth consent detection, shadow SaaS/AI control, unmanaged device protection, browser telemetry |
| Target User | Privacy-conscious professionals, developers, researchers | Security teams in enterprises with AI adoption and browser-based threats |
Choose Push Security if you're an enterprise security team needing to protect against advanced browser attacks and control AI usage across your organization. Choose ScreenMind if you're a privacy-focused individual wanting a local, searchable screen memory tool for personal productivity. They serve entirely different needs.
Browser security platform stopping AI-powered attacks, securing AI usage, and hardening identities.
Visit WebsiteFeature-by-feature
Push Security focuses on enterprise browser security, offering features like AiTM proxy blocking, ClickFix attack prevention, suspicious OAuth consent detection, and visibility into shadow SaaS and AI apps. It also hardens identities and prevents data loss across browsers. ScreenMind, on the other hand, is a local screen memory tool that captures and analyzes screen activity using Gemma 4. It provides semantic+FTS5 search, conversational RAG, meeting transcription, voice memos, and a day rewind feature. Push is agent-based for browser telemetry and real-time control, while ScreenMind is a desktop app with no cloud dependencies. Push integrates via extension, ScreenMind via MCP Server, Obsidian, Notion, and webhooks. They are fundamentally different products sharing an AI angle.
Pricing compared
Push Security uses a contact-based pricing model typical of enterprise security tools, indicating significant cost. ScreenMind is free and open-source under the MIT license, making it accessible to anyone. Push likely includes per-seat or subscription fees for a team, while ScreenMind requires only hardware resources. For organizations evaluating cost, Push represents a major investment in security posture, while ScreenMind offers a high-value personal productivity tool at zero direct cost. However, Push's pricing likely includes deployment, support, and integrations suitable for large teams, whereas ScreenMind's free model means self-hosting and no official support.
Who should pick which
- Enterprise security engineerPick: Push Security
Push provides browser-based security controls to stop advanced attacks like AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking, plus visibility into shadow AI usage.
- Privacy-conscious professionalPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind runs 100% locally with no telemetry, offers screen memory and AI analysis without cloud dependence.
- Developer building automationsPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind's MCP Server integration with Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, and webhooks enables automation on screen history.
- CISO concerned about AI data leakagePick: Push Security
Push detects and prevents data loss across AI tools, apps, and sessions, giving visibility into AI app usage.
- Meeting-heavy workerPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind offers local meeting transcription for Zoom, Teams, and Meet, plus summaries.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are Push Security and ScreenMind competitors?
No, they serve very different markets: Push is an enterprise browser security tool, ScreenMind is a personal local screen memory app.
Can ScreenMind prevent browser attacks?
No, ScreenMind is not designed for security. It captures and analyzes screen activity locally, without any attack prevention features.
Does Push Security require a dedicated browser?
No, Push is a browser extension that works with existing browsers (Chrome, etc.). It does not replace the browser.
Is ScreenMind free?
Yes, ScreenMind is open-source under the MIT license, fully free to use and modify.
Can Push Security detect AI tool usage?
Yes, Push provides visibility and control over AI apps in the browser, including blocking data leakage.
Does ScreenMind have cloud sync?
No, ScreenMind runs entirely on-device with no cloud dependencies. Cloud sync is not supported.
What hardware do I need for ScreenMind?
ScreenMind requires a GPU to run Gemma 4 models. It is not suitable for low-end devices.
Can Push Security handle unmanaged devices?
Yes, Push extends browser-based protection to unmanaged devices, hardening identities and enforcing MFA.
More ScreenMind or Push Security comparisons
Choose Push Security if your priority is defending against browser-based attacks, securing AI tool usage, and hardening identities; choose Tableau if your need is data visualization and analytics. The
Push Security and Looker serve entirely different domains: browser security versus business intelligence. Choose Push Security if your immediate need is protecting against AI-enabled phishing, session
Push Security and Power BI serve completely different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for defending against AI-driven attacks and shadow IT, while Power BI is a BI and visualizatio
Choose Push Security if your immediate pain is browser-based attacks, shadow AI, and identity vulnerabilities. Choose Amplitude if you're a product or data team needing deep behavioral analytics and e
Datadog is the dominant choice for organizations needing unified observability and security across infrastructure, apps, and clouds, but its complexity and cost can escalate. Push Security is purpose-
Choose Push Security if you're a security team combating browser-based attacks, shadow AI, and identity vulnerabilities. Choose Sentry if you're a developer needing real-time error tracking and perfor
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.