ScreenMind vs Push Security

Push Security and ScreenMind are different product classes, so 'features' mean entirely different things. Push is a defensive browser extension: it detects and blocks Adversary-in-the-Middle reverse-proxy phishing, cloned login pages, Browser-in-the-Browser, Browser-in-the-Middle, ClickFix clipboard injection, device-code phishing, and consent phishing — including OAuth monitoring, blocking and malicious app removal. It inventories and risk-scores browser extensions, watches supply-chain changes (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting), detects infostealer delivery, credential stuffing across SaaS logins, QR/SMS mobile phishing, and 'ghost logins' on password fallback paths that bypass SSO. It also covers shadow-AI discovery and control over prompts, clipboard use and LLM uploads, and integrations span Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Sentinel, Splunk, Datadog and SentinelOne. Recent research (ConsentFix v3, LLMShare abusing AI chatbot share features to host malware, AiTM kits targeting TikTok business accounts) shows the threat surface it targets keeps expanding. ScreenMind is the opposite: a recording-and-recall tool. It uses pHash content-change detection instead of a fixed timer, runs Gemma 4 vision analysis for app/activity/mood/scene/spatial labels, and offers hybrid search (MiniLM embeddings plus FTS5). It does conversational RAG over your screen history, voice memos transcribed by Gemma 4's audio encoder, auto-detected Zoom/Teams/Meet transcription with summaries, three analysis modes (~76s/~40s/~12s), per-app caching, sub-1-second chat-first GPU priority, auto-pause for games/editors/3D software, redaction of cards/SSNs/API keys/passwords, and AES encryption at rest. One is an organizational control plane; the other is a personal memory tool.

The pricing models share nothing. Push Security is paid enterprise software with a stated entry point of $5/user/month for mid-market security teams under 500 seats — the kind of per-seat, per-month line item a security budget absorbs because it replaces or augments email/SWG controls and avoids an enterprise browser migration or endpoint agent rollout. Total cost scales with seats and the integrations you wire in (Okta, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Splunk, Sentinel). There is no free tier described and no consumer motion. ScreenMind is free and MIT-licensed; its cost is hardware and your time. You need a macOS machine, and it runs on any GPU with 4GB VRAM or CPU-only with no NPU required, so modest hardware works. The trade is that you self-host, self-support, and accept an early-stage project: roughly 216 GitHub stars, 16 forks, 90 commits, and explicitly no vendor SLA or paid support. Push's price buys institutional trust, integrations and a support relationship; ScreenMind's price of zero buys you a tool you maintain yourself. Comparing '$5/user/month vs $0' is apples-to-oranges — one is a recurring security line item protecting many users, the other is a no-cost app one person installs. Neither is 'cheaper'; they just aren't sold into the same budget or decision.