ScreenMind vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | ScreenMind | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source, no paid tiers) | Freemium (free tier + paid plans; pricing undisclosed) |
| Focus | Local screen memory & AI assistant (privacy-first) | Browser security (AiTM, AI tool control, identity) |
| Deployment | macOS desktop app (Apple Silicon or AMD GPU with 4GB+ VRAM) | Browser extension + telemetry (multi-browser) |
| AI Model | Gemma 4 (Google, open-weight) – fully local | Proprietary models (no specific model disclosed) |
| Key Integration | MCP Server → Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Obsidian, Slack, Discord | Okta, Azure AD, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Privacy | 100% local (AES encryption, zero telemetry) | Cloud-based (telemetry sent to Push cloud) |
If your priority is browser security – blocking AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS, and AI data leaks – Push Security is the clear choice. But if you need private, on-device screen memory for personal productivity and recall, ScreenMind is a groundbreaking free tool. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you're securing a workforce or augmenting your own memory.
Open-source macOS app that captures your screen, analyzes it locally with Gemma 4, and builds a searchable, chat-able AI memory.
Visit Website
Push Security is a browser extension that detects and blocks browser-based phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI use.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: ScreenMind vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
ScreenMind
21 mentions across 5 sources · 73% positive (averaged across 5 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub
What users praise
- • 100% local – no cloud dependency or telemetry at all.
- • Free and open-source (MIT license) – no subscription or hidden fees.
- • Uses Gemma 4 with vision, audio, and reasoning on-device.
- • Smart content-change capture avoids pointless screenshots.
What frustrates them
- • Linux Wayland capture is completely broken for many users.
- • Frequently misidentifies applications as VSCode or Programming.
- • Only captures main screen on multi-monitor setups.
- • No Windows multi-monitor support confirmed.
Researched Jul 26, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 46% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension deployment avoids endpoint agents and browser migrations, a major enterprise adoption advantage
- • Covers the specific modern phishing techniques actually seen in breaches: AiTM, BitB, ClickFix, device code
- • Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia) is a genuinely timely differentiator as those tools proliferate
- • Shadow AI discovery and prompt/clipboard/file reporting give security teams visibility they otherwise lack
What frustrates them
- • Almost no independent community feedback — most visible content is Push's own marketing
- • Extension-only enforcement can be disabled or bypassed more easily than an endpoint agent
- • Broad prompt, clipboard, and file monitoring raises serious privacy and works-council concerns
- • Overlaps heavily with CASB, SWG, and native browser controls already in many stacks
Researched Sep 29, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team leadPick: Push Security
Push Security directly addresses modern browser threats like AiTM phishing, malicious OAuth, and AI data leakage. Its integration with identity providers and SIEMs fits enterprise security workflows.
- Privacy-conscious knowledge workerPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind offers 100% local, encrypted screen memory with no cloud dependencies. Perfect for users who want searchable records of their work without sacrificing privacy.
- Developer building automationsPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind's MCP Server and Agent platform allow developers to query screen history from tools like Claude Desktop, VS Code, and Cursor – enabling custom automation on past activity.
- Identity & access managerPick: Push Security
Push Security hardens unmanaged identities, detects ghost logins, and enforces MFA/SSO – critical for identity security in organizations with diverse identity providers.
- Meeting-heavy researcherPick: ScreenMind
ScreenMind provides local transcription for Zoom/Teams/Meet, and its RAG chat lets you ask about specific discussions without cloud transcription risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
ScreenMind vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If your priority is browser security – blocking AiTM phishing, shadow SaaS, and AI data leaks – Push Security is the clear choice. But if you need private, on-device screen memory for personal productivity and recall, ScreenMind is a groundbreaking free tool. They solve completely different problems; pick based on whether you're securing a workforce or augmenting your own memory.
Which tool is better for AI tool governance?
Push Security is specialized for AI tool visibility and policy enforcement. It detects AI usage, blocks data leakage, and enforces policies in real time. ScreenMind does not manage AI tools; it uses AI to analyze your screen.
Can ScreenMind replace Microsoft Recall?
Yes, as a privacy-first alternative – it stores data locally, does not phone home, and uses open-weight Gemma 4. Unlike Recall, it has no cloud sync, but offers voice memos, meeting transcription, and MCP integration.
Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?
No. Push works as a browser extension on any Chromium or Firefox-based browser. It does not require switching to a single-vendor enterprise browser like Island or Talon.
Is ScreenMind cross-platform?
Currently macOS only. Windows and Linux users need to wait or use alternatives. Push Security works on any OS where the supported browsers run.
How does Push Security detect AiTM phishing?
It monitors browser telemetry for adversary-in-the-middle patterns, such as credential harvesting proxies, and blocks the attacker in real time before credentials are stolen.
Can ScreenMind be used without a GPU?
No, it requires a 4GB+ GPU (Apple M-series or AMD) to run Gemma 4 locally. Intel integrated graphics are not supported.
Which tool integrates with enterprise identity providers?
Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, and more. ScreenMind has no identity integration – it's a personal tool.
Do either of them offer cloud backup?
Push Security is cloud-connected by design (telemetry sent to its cloud). ScreenMind is fully local with no cloud sync; backups are manual.
More ScreenMind or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: June 18, 2026