Exogram vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Exogram | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | freemium · from Team (Control Plane - Fleet Visibility) $99/mo flat for 5 seats | freemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly) |
| Best for | Security engineers hardening AI agent deployment pipelines, FinTech teams needing audit-proof execution logs for compliance | Security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption |
| Standout features | Deterministic tool-call evaluation (0.07ms per decision) · Cryptographic audit chain (SHA-256 hash-linked) · Agent Identity Resolution with permit/deny wildcards | Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block |
| Viability score | 77/100 | 95/100 |
| API | Yes | Yes |
Exogram is the stronger pick for security engineers hardening ai agent deployment pipelines; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).
Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-06.
Deterministic execution governance for AI agents with cryptographic audit trails.
Visit Website
Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- Security team at a mid-size companyPick: Push Security
Push provides browser-based visibility and blocking of AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth, plus AI tool usage controls—all without forcing a browser switch.
- DevOps team deploying AI agents in productionPick: Exogram
Exogram’s deterministic, cryptographic audit trail and 0.07ms evaluation overhead ensure every tool call is governed and provable, critical for compliance and safety.
- Compliance officer at a FinTechPick: Exogram
Exogram’s SHA-256 linked audit chain and SOC 2/EU AI Act readiness meet strict regulatory requirements for agent actions.
- IT team reducing shadow SaaSPick: Push Security
Push detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS via browser telemetry, helping IT discover and control unmanaged app usage.
- AI startup using multi-agent frameworksPick: Exogram
Exogram integrates directly with LangChain, AutoGen, and CrewAI to add governance without modifying agent code.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Exogram or Push Security?
The best choice between Exogram and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.
What are the main differences between Exogram and Push Security?
The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.
Is there a free version of Exogram or Push Security?
Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.
More Exogram or Push Security comparisons
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.