CodeGate vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
CodeGate or Push Security: which should you choose?
| Dimension | CodeGate | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium (paid tiers available) |
| Primary Focus | Local proxy preventing code leakage from AI coding tools | Browser security against AI-powered attacks and shadow AI usage |
| Deployment | Local proxy server | Cloud-based browser extension |
| Key Protection | Secrets/code leakage via AI coding assistants | AiTM phishing, session hijacking, malicious OAuth, data loss to LLMs |
| Integrations | VS Code, JetBrains, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, OpenAI API | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Latest News | 2026-07-01: Show HN: Smart model routing — a direct competitor emerged | 2026-06-26: Push experienced a poisoned tenant attack — sharing lessons |
Choose Push Security if you're a security or identity team needing comprehensive browser protection against AI-driven attacks and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose CodeGate if you're a developer or small team solely concerned about code leakage from AI coding assistants and prefer a free, local proxy solution. Push offers richer threat detection but is cloud-based; CodeGate is free and local but limited to code privacy.
Self-hosted MCP and LLM gateway control plane that ties every AI agent tool call and model call to a real identity on your Kubernetes
Visit Website
Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility
Visit WebsiteWho should pick CodeGate, and who should pick Push Security?
- Enterprise Security TeamPick: Push Security
Push Security provides broad browser threat detection (AiTM, session hijacking, OAuth attacks) and AI tool governance, which enterprise teams need.
- Identity TeamPick: Push Security
Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails, reducing risk from shadow logins.
- Solo Developer Using AI Coding AssistantsPick: CodeGate
CodeGate is free, local, and lightweight (VS Code/JetBrains) to prevent code leakage.
- Regulated Industry DeveloperPick: CodeGate
CodeGate enforces data governance policies locally without sending code to external cloud services.
- Security Operations Center AnalystPick: Push Security
Push's agentic threat hunting and integrations with SIEM/SOAR (Splunk, Snowflake) fit SOC workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
CodeGate vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if you're a security or identity team needing comprehensive browser protection against AI-driven attacks and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose CodeGate if you're a developer or small team solely concerned about code leakage from AI coding assistants and prefer a free, local proxy solution. Push offers richer threat detection but is cloud-based; CodeGate is free and local but limited to code privacy.
Is Push Security an enterprise browser?
No, it's a browser security platform that works across all major browsers via extension — no browser migration needed.
Does CodeGate work with GitHub Copilot?
Yes, CodeGate integrates with GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and OpenAI API.
Can Push Security block AI data leakage?
Yes, it offers in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time AI tool usage control.
Is CodeGate cloud-based?
No, CodeGate runs as a local proxy on the developer's machine.
Does Push Security detect phishing?
Yes, it detects and blocks AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and ConsentFix attacks.
What IDEs does CodeGate support?
VS Code and JetBrains IDEs.
Is Push Security free?
It offers a freemium model with a free tier; full features require a paid subscription.
Does CodeGate have a paid plan?
No, it is entirely free.
What else are CodeGate and Push Security compared with?
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Where can you read more about CodeGate and Push Security?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: