CodeGate vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-14
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCodeGatePush Security
PricingFreeFreemium (paid tiers available)
Primary FocusLocal proxy preventing code leakage from AI coding toolsBrowser security against AI-powered attacks and shadow AI usage
DeploymentLocal proxy serverCloud-based browser extension
Key ProtectionSecrets/code leakage via AI coding assistantsAiTM phishing, session hijacking, malicious OAuth, data loss to LLMs
IntegrationsVS Code, JetBrains, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, OpenAI APIOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest News2026-07-01: Show HN: Smart model routing — a direct competitor emerged2026-06-26: Push experienced a poisoned tenant attack — sharing lessons

Choose Push Security if you're a security or identity team needing comprehensive browser protection against AI-driven attacks and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose CodeGate if you're a developer or small team solely concerned about code leakage from AI coding assistants and prefer a free, local proxy solution. Push offers richer threat detection but is cloud-based; CodeGate is free and local but limited to code privacy.

Try CodeGateTry Push Security
CodeGate
CodeGate

Run your AI agents on Kubernetes with full MCP governance

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
1 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
Web
Categories
🔌 MCP Servers & Agent Tooling🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails⚙️ Developer Infrastructure
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Run MCP servers as pods on Kubernetes
Curated MCP server registry for trusted servers
Single gateway endpoint for all MCP tools
Admin portal for control and user access
Native OpenTelemetry instrumentation
Policy-as-code via GitOps
Map Kubernetes ServiceAccounts and OIDC claims to MCP permissions
Apply existing Ingress, NetworkPolicy, and service mesh rules
Support self-hosted and hosted MCP servers
ToolHive open-source core (Apache 2.0)
Shadow MCP detection and observability
LLM spend control and AI spend governance
Forward deployed engineering support
Enterprise security review readiness
MCP Registry, Gateway, Runtime, and AI Gateway components
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing page detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking and OAuth app management
Session hijacking detection and response
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO login guidance
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
Kubernetes
Ingress
NetworkPolicy
Service Mesh
OpenTelemetry
OIDC
GitOps
Cursor
Anthropic MCP Tunnels
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: CodeGate vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

CodeGate

9 mentions across 1 sources · 55% positive — mixed (averaged across 1 source)

Hacker News

What users praise

  • • Free and open-source with no cost barriers to entry.
  • • Intercepts AI API calls to catch secrets before they leave.
  • • Lightweight local proxy that integrates with VS Code and JetBrains.
  • • Configurable policy rules using regex pattern matching.

What frustrates them

  • • Very limited community feedback — only 9 HN posts total.
  • • No support for team/enterprise use cases in current demo scope.
  • • Documentation is sparse according to early user impressions.
  • • Firecracker sandbox feature still marked as experimental.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
  • • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
  • • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
  • • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.

What frustrates them

  • • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
  • • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
  • • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
  • • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.

Researched Sep 8, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Enterprise Security Team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides broad browser threat detection (AiTM, session hijacking, OAuth attacks) and AI tool governance, which enterprise teams need.

  • Identity Team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails, reducing risk from shadow logins.

  • Solo Developer Using AI Coding Assistants
    Pick: CodeGate

    CodeGate is free, local, and lightweight (VS Code/JetBrains) to prevent code leakage.

  • Regulated Industry Developer
    Pick: CodeGate

    CodeGate enforces data governance policies locally without sending code to external cloud services.

  • Security Operations Center Analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push's agentic threat hunting and integrations with SIEM/SOAR (Splunk, Snowflake) fit SOC workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

CodeGate vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if you're a security or identity team needing comprehensive browser protection against AI-driven attacks and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose CodeGate if you're a developer or small team solely concerned about code leakage from AI coding assistants and prefer a free, local proxy solution. Push offers richer threat detection but is cloud-based; CodeGate is free and local but limited to code privacy.

Is Push Security an enterprise browser?

No, it's a browser security platform that works across all major browsers via extension — no browser migration needed.

Does CodeGate work with GitHub Copilot?

Yes, CodeGate integrates with GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and OpenAI API.

Can Push Security block AI data leakage?

Yes, it offers in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time AI tool usage control.

Is CodeGate cloud-based?

No, CodeGate runs as a local proxy on the developer's machine.

Does Push Security detect phishing?

Yes, it detects and blocks AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and ConsentFix attacks.

What IDEs does CodeGate support?

VS Code and JetBrains IDEs.

Is Push Security free?

It offers a freemium model with a free tier; full features require a paid subscription.

Does CodeGate have a paid plan?

No, it is entirely free.

More CodeGate or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

CodeGate
View CodeGate reviewCodeGate alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI MCP Servers & Agent Tooling toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026