Shadowsearch vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Shadowsearch | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid (free tier limited) | Freemium |
| Deployment | Web-based search tool | Cloud-based browser extension |
| Primary Use | People search & background check for individuals | Enterprise browser security & AI threat detection |
| Integrations | None listed | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Key Feature | Email/phone/username lookup & social profile linking | AiTM phishing detection & AI tool DLP |
| Target User | Safety-conscious individuals & online daters | Security & identity teams |
If you're an enterprise security team battling browser-based attacks and unmanaged AI use, Push Security is the clear choice with real-time detection and controls. For personal safety or curiosity (e.g., vetting a date or marketplace seller), Shadowsearch offers instant digital footprint scans for a fee. These tools serve completely different needs—select based on whether your problem is corporate threat protection or individual identity verification.
Private people search to uncover anyone's digital footprint from public data
Visit Website
Browser-native phishing and shadow AI defense with $5/user/month pricing for teams up to 500 employees
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Shadowsearch vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Shadowsearch
20 mentions across 1 sources · 0% positive — critical (averaged across 1 source)
App Store
What users praise
- • None substantiated by community feedback — all reviews are critical.
- • The concept of deep profile scanning is appealing.
- • Potential for useful public data aggregation if it worked.
- • Could be helpful for vetting online contacts in theory.
What frustrates them
- • No free trial — must pay to see if it works.
- • Only returns basic public information you could find yourself.
- • Charges for annual subscription when weekly was selected.
- • Runs out of credits after 1-2 searches; asks for more money.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Extension-based, no endpoint agent or migration — sidesteps the classic rollout fight.
- • Directly targets AI-era threats: AiTM, ClickFix, device-code phishing, malicious OAuth.
- • Inventories and controls shadow AI apps and monitors prompts and file uploads.
- • Covers BYOD and Chromebooks, which many endpoint-centric tools handle poorly.
What frustrates them
- • Virtually no independent, real-user community feedback to validate the marketing claims.
- • Browser-extension delivery depends on the very sandbox that repeatedly escapes.
- • Monitoring prompts and file uploads raises employee privacy and consent friction.
- • Crowded market: Island, LayerX, Menlo and others compete in the same space.
Researched Sep 21, 2026
Who should pick which
- Enterprise security teamPick: Push Security
Push Security directly addresses browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and AI tool misuse with real-time detection, DLP, and SIEM integrations—exactly what enterprises need.
- Online daterPick: Shadowsearch
Shadowsearch quickly aggregates social profiles, public records, and dating site presence from an email or phone number, helping verify a match before meeting.
- Identity team enforcing MFAPick: Push Security
Push Security includes in-browser MFA registration guardrails and compromised token detection, hardening identities without requiring an enterprise browser.
- Marketplace buyer/sellerPick: Shadowsearch
Shadowsearch can reveal linked accounts and red flags from a username or phone number, helping avoid scams in peer-to-peer transactions.
- CIO concerned about AI data leakagePick: Push Security
Push Security offers visibility into AI tool usage and enforces clipboard/file upload policies, directly preventing data loss to unsanctioned LLMs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Shadowsearch vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If you're an enterprise security team battling browser-based attacks and unmanaged AI use, Push Security is the clear choice with real-time detection and controls. For personal safety or curiosity (e.g., vetting a date or marketplace seller), Shadowsearch offers instant digital footprint scans for a fee. These tools serve completely different needs—select based on whether your problem is corporate threat protection or individual identity verification.
Can Push Security block phishing attacks in real time?
Yes, it detects and blocks AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and ConsentFix attacks using browser telemetry and autonomous agents.
Does Shadowsearch work internationally?
It aggregates public data from across the web, but accuracy and coverage may vary outside the US.
Does Push Security require a specific browser?
No, it works as a browser extension across Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and others.
What can I search with Shadowsearch?
Email, phone number, username, or photo to find linked social profiles, public records, and web mentions.
Is Push Security compliant with AI regulations?
Yes, recent news highlights its role in meeting US, EU, and UK AI compliance requirements via browser visibility.
Does Shadowsearch provide court-admissible evidence?
No, it's for personal vetting only; not guaranteed for legal use.
Can Push Security detect shadow SaaS?
Yes, it identifies ghost logins and shadow SaaS without requiring an enterprise browser.
Is there a free version of Shadowsearch?
Yes, a limited free tier exists, but paid plans are needed for full results.
More Shadowsearch or Push Security comparisons
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026