Mcp Shodan vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Mcp Shodan | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Primary Use Case | Device reconnaissance via AI assistants | Browser security & AI usage control |
| Target User | Security researchers, pen testers, DevOps | Security & identity teams |
| Deployment | MCP server (open-source) | Cloud-based (browser extension) |
| Key Feature | Shodan search, IP recon, CVE lookup | AiTM phishing/block, agentic hunting |
| Integration | Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
If you're a security or identity team battling browser-based attacks and AI data leakage, Push Security is the clear choice—it blocks AiTM phishing and provides agentic threat hunting. For security researchers who need quick Shodan lookups from an AI assistant, Mcp Shodan is a free, lightweight tool. They solve different problems entirely.
Open-source MCP server that lets AI assistants like Claude Code query Shodan for device, DNS, and CVE data from your terminal.
Visit Website
Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Mcp Shodan vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Mcp Shodan
1 mentions across 1 sources · 80% positive (averaged across 1 source)
GitHub
What users praise
- • Enables natural language Shodan queries in AI assistants.
- • Automates IP reconnaissance, DNS lookups, and vulnerability checks.
- • Works with popular AI tools like Claude Code and Gemini CLI.
- • Open-source and free to use with your own Shodan API key.
What frustrates them
- • Limited community feedback makes reliability unproven.
- • Requires Shodan API key and compatible AI client setup.
- • Only supports a handful of AI assistant platforms.
- • No documentation on error handling or rate limits.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
- • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
- • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
- • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast
What frustrates them
- • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
- • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
- • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
- • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues
Researched Oct 7, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team (Enterprise)Pick: Push Security
Push provides comprehensive browser-based attack detection, AI usage control, and identity hardening—essential for modern enterprises facing AiTM, ClickFix, and shadow AI.
- Penetration tester / Security researcherPick: Mcp Shodan
Mcp Shodan lets researchers quickly query Shodan from Claude or Codex for device reconnaissance, DNS, and CVEs, automating manual API calls.
- Security architect with AI adoptionPick: Push Security
Push's AI tool visibility, clipboard DLP, and OAuth controls help secure unmanaged AI use, aligning with recent AI regulation compliance trends.
- DevOps engineer doing asset discoveryPick: Mcp Shodan
Mcp Shodan enables quick hostname and service enumeration from CLI assistants, useful for inventory and exposure checks.
- Solo security practitionerPick: Mcp Shodan
Free and simple to set up—ideal for individuals with limited budgets who need Shodan integration in their AI workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Mcp Shodan vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If you're a security or identity team battling browser-based attacks and AI data leakage, Push Security is the clear choice—it blocks AiTM phishing and provides agentic threat hunting. For security researchers who need quick Shodan lookups from an AI assistant, Mcp Shodan is a free, lightweight tool. They solve different problems entirely.
Do Push Security and Mcp Shodan overlap?
No. Push monitors browser activity and blocks threats; Mcp Shodan searches internet-connected devices. They serve different domains: browser security vs. external reconnaissance.
Can I use Mcp Shodan without a Shodan API key?
No. Mcp Shodan is just a wrapper; you need a Shodan account and API key (free tier available but limited).
Does Push Security require a dedicated browser?
No—it works as a browser extension across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc., and does not force migration to a single enterprise browser.
Is Mcp Shodan suitable for enterprise teams?
It lacks RBAC, audit logs, and team sharing. Best for individual researchers or small teams; enterprises may prefer direct Shodan API usage.
Does Push Security detect AI tool misuse?
Yes—it provides real-time AI tool inventory, blocks clipboard data leaks and file uploads to unauthorized LLMs, and monitors OAuth grants.
Can I integrate Push Security with SIEM?
Yes, it integrates with Splunk and Snowflake, plus identity providers like Okta and Azure AD.
Is Mcp Shodan open source?
Yes, it's hosted on the MCP Registry as an open-source project.
Which tool is better for compliance?
Push Security helps meet AI regulations (US, EU, UK) by providing browser visibility into AI tool use and data loss prevention. Mcp Shodan does not address compliance.
More Mcp Shodan or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026