Mcp Shodan vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Mcp Shodan | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Primary Use Case | Device reconnaissance via AI assistants | Browser security & AI usage control |
| Target User | Security researchers, pen testers, DevOps | Security & identity teams |
| Deployment | MCP server (open-source) | Cloud-based (browser extension) |
| Key Feature | Shodan search, IP recon, CVE lookup | AiTM phishing/block, agentic hunting |
| Integration | Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
If you're a security or identity team battling browser-based attacks and AI data leakage, Push Security is the clear choice—it blocks AiTM phishing and provides agentic threat hunting. For security researchers who need quick Shodan lookups from an AI assistant, Mcp Shodan is a free, lightweight tool. They solve different problems entirely.
Search and analyze internet-connected devices via Shodan's MCP server for AI assistants
Visit Website
What real users say: Mcp Shodan vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Mcp Shodan
1 mentions across 1 sources · 80% positive
GitHub
What users praise
- • Enables natural language Shodan queries in AI assistants.
- • Automates IP reconnaissance, DNS lookups, and vulnerability checks.
- • Works with popular AI tools like Claude Code and Gemini CLI.
- • Open-source and free to use with your own Shodan API key.
What frustrates them
- • Limited community feedback makes reliability unproven.
- • Requires Shodan API key and compatible AI client setup.
- • Only supports a handful of AI assistant platforms.
- • No documentation on error handling or rate limits.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
36 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Deploys as extension across all major browsers, avoiding enterprise lock-in
- • Autonomous hunting agents detect and block zero-day threats in real time
- • Addresses emerging AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and session hijacking attacks
- • Provides shadow AI discovery and governance, a growing need
What frustrates them
- • Limited independent reviews and community deployment case studies
- • Extension-based agent may impact browser performance on low-end devices
- • Pricing for advanced features likely steep for SMBs
- • Configuration complexity requires skilled security engineers
Researched Aug 18, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team (Enterprise)Pick: Push Security
Push provides comprehensive browser-based attack detection, AI usage control, and identity hardening—essential for modern enterprises facing AiTM, ClickFix, and shadow AI.
- Penetration tester / Security researcherPick: Mcp Shodan
Mcp Shodan lets researchers quickly query Shodan from Claude or Codex for device reconnaissance, DNS, and CVEs, automating manual API calls.
- Security architect with AI adoptionPick: Push Security
Push's AI tool visibility, clipboard DLP, and OAuth controls help secure unmanaged AI use, aligning with recent AI regulation compliance trends.
- DevOps engineer doing asset discoveryPick: Mcp Shodan
Mcp Shodan enables quick hostname and service enumeration from CLI assistants, useful for inventory and exposure checks.
- Solo security practitionerPick: Mcp Shodan
Free and simple to set up—ideal for individuals with limited budgets who need Shodan integration in their AI workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Mcp Shodan vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If you're a security or identity team battling browser-based attacks and AI data leakage, Push Security is the clear choice—it blocks AiTM phishing and provides agentic threat hunting. For security researchers who need quick Shodan lookups from an AI assistant, Mcp Shodan is a free, lightweight tool. They solve different problems entirely.
Do Push Security and Mcp Shodan overlap?
No. Push monitors browser activity and blocks threats; Mcp Shodan searches internet-connected devices. They serve different domains: browser security vs. external reconnaissance.
Can I use Mcp Shodan without a Shodan API key?
No. Mcp Shodan is just a wrapper; you need a Shodan account and API key (free tier available but limited).
Does Push Security require a dedicated browser?
No—it works as a browser extension across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc., and does not force migration to a single enterprise browser.
Is Mcp Shodan suitable for enterprise teams?
It lacks RBAC, audit logs, and team sharing. Best for individual researchers or small teams; enterprises may prefer direct Shodan API usage.
Does Push Security detect AI tool misuse?
Yes—it provides real-time AI tool inventory, blocks clipboard data leaks and file uploads to unauthorized LLMs, and monitors OAuth grants.
Can I integrate Push Security with SIEM?
Yes, it integrates with Splunk and Snowflake, plus identity providers like Okta and Azure AD.
Is Mcp Shodan open source?
Yes, it's hosted on the MCP Registry as an open-source project.
Which tool is better for compliance?
Push Security helps meet AI regulations (US, EU, UK) by providing browser visibility into AI tool use and data loss prevention. Mcp Shodan does not address compliance.
More Mcp Shodan or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026