Malloc Inc vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionMalloc IncPush Security
PlatformMobile app (iOS/Android)Browser extension
Primary Threat FocusSpyware (Pegasus, Predator), app data tracking, network threatsAiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, malicious OAuth, AI data leakage
Key DifferentiatorReal-time on-device spyware detection, domain transparencyBrowser telemetry + agentic threat hunting, AI tool governance
Target AudienceHigh-risk individuals, privacy-conscious consumers, enterprisesSecurity teams, identity teams, enterprises
ComplianceGDPR, ISO 27001, MASA Level 2Supports AI regulation compliance (per news 2026-06-02)
Try Malloc IncTry Push Security
Malloc Inc
Malloc Inc

Malloc pairs AI-driven spyware detection with a zero-log VPN and domain transparency for high-risk mobile users.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Paid
Paid
Plans
Contact for pricing
$300/year
$550/seat/year
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
3 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Beginner-friendly
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Mobile
Web
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy🚨 Threat Detection & SOC
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Real-time spyware detection for Pegasus (NSO) and Predator (Cytrox)
On-device AI anomaly detection across network activity, processes, and files
Federated learning that trains detection models without sending raw user data off-device
Zero-log VPN with 150+ countries and 3000+ servers
Domain transparency showing the exact domains your apps and phone contact
Network protection blocking spyware, phishing, trackers, advertisers, cryptominers, and adult sites
Camera and microphone usage monitoring with per-app duration
One-tap microphone mute for private conversations
App Monitoring: see where your apps send data (Android)
Scan for malicious apps, trackers, and risky permissions (Android)
Permission manager for critical app privacy permissions
Anti-theft alarm that triggers while charging in public places
Root and jailbreak detection
Identity leak monitoring (VIP Protection)
Admin dashboard with fleet visibility, role-based control, REST API and SDK (Business & Government)
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: Malloc Inc vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Malloc Inc

15 mentions across 1 sources · 10% positive — critical (averaged across 1 source)

Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Real-time spyware detection for Pegasus, Predator, and others.
  • • On-device AI runs locally, preserving privacy.
  • • App data flow transparency shows exact domains apps contact.
  • • Zero-log VPN architecture with no data retention.

What frustrates them

  • • No verifiable user feedback on Lemmy or other sources.
  • • Pricing is high compared to mainstream VPN+antimalware suites.
  • • Limited platform support (only Android/iOS).
  • • Business tier at $550/seat/year may deter small teams.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Enterprise security team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides browser telemetry, detection of AiTM phishing and session hijacking, and AI tool governance, which are top priorities for enterprise security teams securing remote work.

  • Journalist facing spyware threats
    Pick: Malloc Inc

    Malloc detects Pegasus-level spyware in real time and offers app data flow transparency, critical for journalists needing mobile privacy.

  • SaaS company with AI tool adoption
    Pick: Push Security

    Push's AI tool visibility, DLP controls, and OAuth grant blocking prevent data leakage to unapproved AI services, ideal for SaaS companies embracing AI.

  • Privacy-conscious consumer
    Pick: Malloc Inc

    Malloc's domain transparency and VPN block trackers and spyware, giving users insight into app communications and protecting privacy.

  • Identity team hardening MFA adoption
    Pick: Push Security

    Push's in-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails enforce secure identity practices without needing a dedicated identity tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Push Security detect spyware on mobile devices?

Push Security includes mobile phishing detection via SMS and QR codes, but its core platform is browser-based on desktop. It is not designed for mobile spyware like Pegasus; that is Malloc's domain.

Does Malloc Inc offer a browser extension?

No, Malloc Inc is a mobile-only solution for iOS and Android. It does not provide browser security features like Push Security.

Which tool protects against AI data leakage?

Push Security offers in-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and AI tool visibility, directly addressing AI data leakage. Malloc does not have AI-specific DLP.

Can I use Malloc for enterprise fleet management?

Yes, Malloc's Business plan includes an admin dashboard and fleet visibility, making it suitable for enterprises wanting to manage mobile security across devices.

Is Push Security SOC 2 compliant?

The provided facts do not mention SOC 2 certification, but Push is described as cloud-based and trusted by security leaders. Check with vendor for compliance details.

Does Malloc block phishing attacks?

Yes, Malloc's VPN blocks connections to phishing sites, though it focuses on network-layer blocking. Push blocks phishing at the browser level with specific AiTM and ClickFix detection.

What integrations does Malloc offer?

Malloc's fact sheet lists no specific integrations. Push integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, and Snowflake.

Which tool is better for complying with AI regulations?

Push Security's latest news (2026-06-02) highlights its role in achieving AI regulation compliance via browser visibility and control. Malloc's news does not address AI regulation.

More Malloc Inc or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

Malloc Inc
View Malloc Inc reviewMalloc Inc alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026