Skylos vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-08
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionSkylosPush Security
Primary FocusDead code, secrets, AI-code mistakes in PythonBrowser-based attack detection & AI governance
DeploymentLocal CLI (cloud optional for workspace features)Browser extension (cloud-based)
IntegrationsGitHub Actions, Slack, Discord, VS Code, Claude Code, Cursor, MCPOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Language SupportPython (primary); limited other languagesN/A (browser-agnostic)
Latest News Highlight2026-05-21: GitHub Actions PR gate for AI-generated code workflow2026-06-26: Experienced a poisoned tenant attack via fake OpenAI org invitation

Choose Push Security if you need real-time browser visibility to stop AiTM phishing and control AI tool usage across the enterprise. Choose Skylos if you're a Python developer using AI coding agents and need to catch hallucinated imports and dead code before merge. These tools solve fundamentally different problems—browser security vs. code quality—so your choice depends on whether your pain point is identity-based attacks or AI-generated code defects.

Skylos
Skylos

Skylos is a local-first Python static analysis CLI that catches dead code, secrets, and AI-code mistakes before they merge.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$0
$0
$9 / 50 credits
Custom
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
10 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIAPI
Web
Categories
🔎 Code Review & Quality🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Dead code detection for unused functions, imports, classes, and variables
SQL injection detection that traces tainted input into string-built queries
Command injection detection for unsafe shell execution paths
Hardcoded secrets detection with provider labels (AWS, Stripe) and masked previews
AI-defect detection for hallucinated imports, invented APIs, and phantom calls
Removed security control detection (auth decorators, CSRF checks, rate limits)
Software composition analysis with package reachability and fix versions
Smart Tracing: runs your test suite to eliminate dead-code false positives
Diff review that flags risky changes before merge
GitHub Actions PR gate and CI merge gate
VS Code extension for in-editor findings
MCP server support for agent remediation workflows
Cloud Workspace: stored scans, comparisons, PR comments, and shared triage
Multi-language analysis for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java, Kotlin, PHP, Rust, Dart, C#, and Shell
Local-first scan with no code upload and no login
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
GitHub Actions
VS Code
Slack
Discord
Claude Code
Cursor
MCP
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
REST API

What real users say: Skylos vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Skylos

35 mentions across 4 sources · 52% positive — mixed (averaged across 4 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Dead code detection beats Vulture (29/29 vs 24/29) on real libraries.
  • • Local-first CLI with no login requirement offers quick, private testing.
  • • Unique focus on AI-code mistakes like hallucinated imports and phantom calls.
  • • Integrates with Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Actions, VS Code, and MCP.

What frustrates them

  • • False positives on decorators, TypedDict fields, and closure parameters.
  • • Internal package imports incorrectly flagged as undeclared (SKY-D223).
  • • macOS terminal probing breaks the TUI progress display.
  • • Interactive remove/comment-out fails in WSL2 environments.

Researched Aug 29, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Solo founder (Python developer using AI coding agents)
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos’s free CLI catches hallucinated imports and dead code from AI agents like Claude Code, with zero cost and local-first scans.

  • Security team at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security detects AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth integrations across browsers, with enterprise integrations like Okta and Splunk.

  • Open source maintainer (Python repo)
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos’s low false-positive dead code detection (21× better than Vulture) helps clean up tech debt without noise.

  • Identity team hardening unmanaged identities
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS, aligning with identity hardening goals.

  • DevOps engineer setting up PR gates
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos integrates with GitHub Actions and MCP server to block high-confidence regressions and AI code defects before merge.

Frequently Asked Questions

Skylos vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if you need real-time browser visibility to stop AiTM phishing and control AI tool usage across the enterprise. Choose Skylos if you're a Python developer using AI coding agents and need to catch hallucinated imports and dead code before merge. These tools solve fundamentally different problems—browser security vs. code quality—so your choice depends on whether your pain point is identity-based attacks or AI-generated code defects.

Are Push Security and Skylos direct competitors?

No. Push Security is a browser security platform for attack detection and AI governance. Skylos is a static analysis CLI for Python code quality. They solve different problems.

Can Skylos detect secrets in non-Python files?

Skylos is primarily Python-focused but can detect secrets (e.g., AWS keys) in any file scanned; however, its language support is strongest for Python.

Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?

No. Push Security works as a browser extension across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc., without requiring a forced browser migration.

Is Skylos cloud-only?

No. Skylos runs fully local via CLI, no login required. Cloud Workspace is optional for shared history and triage.

Which tool is better for AI-generated code review?

Skylos is explicitly built for catching AI-generated code mistakes like hallucinated imports and removed security controls.

Does Push Security block AI tool usage?

Yes. Push provides real-time AI tool visibility and can block clipboard/file uploads to unauthorized AI tools, with data loss prevention in-browser.

What integrations does Skylos have for CI/CD?

Skylos integrates with GitHub Actions, MCP server, and tokenless CI. It also has a VS Code extension.

What is the latest news for Push Security?

In June 2026, Push Security published an incident report about a poisoned tenant attack via fake OpenAI org invitation, highlighting the importance of browser security.

More Skylos or Push Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026