Skylos vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-24
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionSkylosPush Security
PricingFree CLI forever; Cloud Workspace $9/mo (50 credits)Free community tier for 1 seat; Pro from $20/user/mo
Primary FocusDead code, secrets, AI-code mistakes in PythonBrowser-based attack detection & AI governance
DeploymentLocal CLI (cloud optional for workspace features)Browser extension (cloud-based)
IntegrationsGitHub Actions, Slack, Discord, VS Code, Claude Code, Cursor, MCPOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Language SupportPython (primary); limited other languagesN/A (browser-agnostic)
Latest News Highlight2026-05-21: GitHub Actions PR gate for AI-generated code workflow2026-06-26: Experienced a poisoned tenant attack via fake OpenAI org invitation

Choose Push Security if you need real-time browser visibility to stop AiTM phishing and control AI tool usage across the enterprise. Choose Skylos if you're a Python developer using AI coding agents and need to catch hallucinated imports and dead code before merge. These tools solve fundamentally different problems—browser security vs. code quality—so your choice depends on whether your pain point is identity-based attacks or AI-generated code defects.

Try SkylosTry Push Security
Skylos
Skylos

Local-first Python static analysis CLI that catches dead code, secrets, and AI-code mistakes before they merge.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security for the AI era: detect and block AI-powered attacks.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0
$9 / 50 credits
Custom
$5/user/month (annual) or monthly per user
Custom
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIPlugin
Web
Categories
🔎 Code Review & Quality🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Dead code detection (unused functions, imports, classes, variables)
Security scanning (SQL injection, command injection)
Secrets detection (AWS, Stripe, hardcoded credentials)
Quality checks (complexity, nesting, duplicate literals)
AI defect detection (hallucinated imports, phantom calls, insecure defaults, removed controls)
Confidence scoring for findings
Smart tracing (runs tests to reduce false positives)
CI/CD integration via GitHub Actions
VS Code extension
MCP server support
PR gate for blocking high-confidence regressions
Cloud workspace for shared triage and history
Software composition analysis (dependency vulnerabilities)
Framework coverage (Django, Flask, FastAPI, Pydantic, pytest)
Agent workflow detection (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot)
AitM / reverse-proxy phishing detection
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
GitHub Actions
Slack
Discord
VS Code
Claude Code
Cursor
MCP
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: Skylos vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Skylos

8 mentions across 2 sources · 75% positive

Hacker News, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Low false-positive rate compared to Vulture on Flask.
  • • Detects hallucinated imports and phantom calls from AI coding assistants.
  • • No login required for local scans.
  • • Free CLI with optional $9/month cloud workspace.

What frustrates them

  • • Deep framework awareness still in development.
  • • Limited to Python and selected frameworks.
  • • Early-stage tool with potential instability.
  • • Community support only; no paid support tier.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Push Security

36 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Deploys as extension across all major browsers, avoiding enterprise lock-in
  • • Autonomous hunting agents detect and block zero-day threats in real time
  • • Addresses emerging AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and session hijacking attacks
  • • Provides shadow AI discovery and governance, a growing need

What frustrates them

  • • Limited independent reviews and community deployment case studies
  • • Extension-based agent may impact browser performance on low-end devices
  • • Pricing for advanced features likely steep for SMBs
  • • Configuration complexity requires skilled security engineers

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Solo founder (Python developer using AI coding agents)
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos’s free CLI catches hallucinated imports and dead code from AI agents like Claude Code, with zero cost and local-first scans.

  • Security team at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security detects AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth integrations across browsers, with enterprise integrations like Okta and Splunk.

  • Open source maintainer (Python repo)
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos’s low false-positive dead code detection (21× better than Vulture) helps clean up tech debt without noise.

  • Identity team hardening unmanaged identities
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS, aligning with identity hardening goals.

  • DevOps engineer setting up PR gates
    Pick: Skylos

    Skylos integrates with GitHub Actions and MCP server to block high-confidence regressions and AI code defects before merge.

Frequently Asked Questions

Skylos vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if you need real-time browser visibility to stop AiTM phishing and control AI tool usage across the enterprise. Choose Skylos if you're a Python developer using AI coding agents and need to catch hallucinated imports and dead code before merge. These tools solve fundamentally different problems—browser security vs. code quality—so your choice depends on whether your pain point is identity-based attacks or AI-generated code defects.

Are Push Security and Skylos direct competitors?

No. Push Security is a browser security platform for attack detection and AI governance. Skylos is a static analysis CLI for Python code quality. They solve different problems.

Can Skylos detect secrets in non-Python files?

Skylos is primarily Python-focused but can detect secrets (e.g., AWS keys) in any file scanned; however, its language support is strongest for Python.

Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?

No. Push Security works as a browser extension across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc., without requiring a forced browser migration.

Is Skylos cloud-only?

No. Skylos runs fully local via CLI, no login required. Cloud Workspace is optional for shared history and triage.

Which tool is better for AI-generated code review?

Skylos is explicitly built for catching AI-generated code mistakes like hallucinated imports and removed security controls.

Does Push Security block AI tool usage?

Yes. Push provides real-time AI tool visibility and can block clipboard/file uploads to unauthorized AI tools, with data loss prevention in-browser.

What integrations does Skylos have for CI/CD?

Skylos integrates with GitHub Actions, MCP server, and tokenless CI. It also has a VS Code extension.

What is the latest news for Push Security?

In June 2026, Push Security published an incident report about a poisoned tenant attack via fake OpenAI org invitation, highlighting the importance of browser security.

More Skylos or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

Skylos
View Skylos reviewSkylos alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Code Review & Quality toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026