Flyto Core vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Flyto Core or Push Security: which should you choose?
| Dimension | Flyto Core | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium (open-source CE self-hosted free, Enterprise paid) | Freemium (paid tiers undisclosed) |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (CE) or managed (Enterprise) | Cloud-based (browser extension + telemetry) |
| Core Focus | Security validation: deterministic automation & evidence-backed attack paths | Browser security: detect/block AI-powered attacks & data loss |
| Key Feature | 250+ modules, replayable evidence, CTEM scoring | Real-time AI tool control, AiTM phishing block, agentic threat hunting |
| Best For | Red teams & CTEM programs needing automated validation | Security teams securing browser-based attacks & AI tool use |
| Latest News | No recent news (likely stable) | 2026-06: Poisoned tenant attack experience, AI security maturity model, agentic threat hunting pipeline |
If your priority is defending against browser-based AI attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, data leakage to LLMs) with real-time controls and agentic hunting, Push Security wins. If you need a self-hosted, open-source automation engine to validate attack paths from existing scanners with replayable evidence, Flyto Core is the choice. Both are freemium, but serve different security postures.
Flyto2 pairs a visual MCP and workflow builder with a source-available CTEM security platform, both running on one deterministic open-source engine.
Visit Website
Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility
Visit WebsiteWho should pick Flyto Core, and who should pick Push Security?
- Security team defending against browser-based AI attacksPick: Push Security
Push provides real-time AiTM phishing, ClickFix blocking, and AI tool data loss prevention — directly addressing AI-era threats.
- Red team needing deterministic, replayable automationPick: Flyto Core
Flyto Core's 250+ modules and evidence capture enable repeatable, auditable attack simulations.
- CTEM program leadPick: Flyto Core
Flyto Core's attack path validation and CTEM scoring from imported findings fit continuous threat exposure management.
- Identity team hardening unmanaged identitiesPick: Push Security
Push's in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and ghost login detection address identity threats.
- Developer building custom security workflowsPick: Flyto Core
Flyto Core's YAML recipes and BYO integrations allow custom automation without SaaS dependency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Flyto Core vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If your priority is defending against browser-based AI attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, data leakage to LLMs) with real-time controls and agentic hunting, Push Security wins. If you need a self-hosted, open-source automation engine to validate attack paths from existing scanners with replayable evidence, Flyto Core is the choice. Both are freemium, but serve different security postures.
Which tool is better for blocking phishing attacks?
Push Security is designed to detect and block AiTM, ClickFix, and ConsentFix phishing in real time using browser telemetry.
Can Flyto Core replace my existing vulnerability scanner?
No, it complements scanners by validating findings and creating attack paths with evidence, not replacing them.
Is Push Security available as a self-hosted solution?
No, it is cloud-based via a browser extension, suitable for environments that allow browser extension deployment.
Does Flyto Core support AI security modules?
Yes, included in its 250+ modules across browser, data, files, cloud, AI, and notifications.
Which tool is easier to set up?
Push Security requires browser extension installation; Flyto Core CE requires self-hosting with DevOps skills.
Can I use both tools together?
Yes, they address different layers: browser security vs. validation automation.
What is the latest news for Flyto Core?
No recent news; the project appears stable without major updates.
Does Push Security integrate with SIEM tools?
Yes, integrates with Splunk and Snowflake for telemetry export.
What else are Flyto Core and Push Security compared with?
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Where can you read more about Flyto Core and Push Security?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: