Flyto Core is live · free plan; paid plans on request · last verified 20 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
Flyto Core
Flyto2 pairs a visual MCP and workflow builder with a source-available CTEM security platform, both running on one deterministic open-source engine.
The interesting thing about Flyto2 is architectural, not marketing: Flow and Warroom share one deterministic engine and one replay model, so an automation you build and a validation you run produce the same class of evidence. Installing Warroom CE from public Docker images lets you evaluate a CTEM loop with your own scanners as inputs, without a rip-and-replace and without a sales conversation. Where it bites: CE is self-hosted — you bring the infrastructure — the application source repo is not public, and the genuinely managed capabilities (commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, remediation orchestration, SSO/SAML/SCIM, audit export, airgap) sit behind Enterprise
Verdict generatedVerified 10d ago · liveness 63/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/flyto-core
- Security teams that own their scanners and want CTEM validation without a rip-and-replace
- Red teams needing deterministic, replayable attack path validation with evidence artifacts
- CTEM program leads who must show stakeholders findings tied to validation status
- Developers building custom automation and security workflows with YAML recipes and MCP tools
- Teams that want fully managed SaaS and will not run their own infrastructure
- Organizations hoping to replace their existing ASM, EASM, SAST, or DAST scanners
- Buyers who require the application source repository to be public
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Flyto2 if you need a fully managed security SaaS and won't run your own Docker infrastructure, or if you expect the tool to replace the scanners you already own rather than ingest their output.
Metered actions can be blocked once credits are exhausted — you'll need to top up or move to Enterprise to keep validating new findings.
CE at $0 covers evaluation and small self-hosted CTEM loops — the cost is your infrastructure, not a license. Enterprise is custom-priced and is where the governed bridge lives: commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, remediation orchestration, SSO/SAML/SCIM, audit export, and airgap. If you only need workflow and browser automation, Flow on the Apache-2.0 flyto-core runtime is the cheaper path; if you need managed validation without running anything, this isn't the tool.
In short
Flyto Core — Flyto2 pairs a visual MCP and workflow builder with a source-available CTEM security platform, both running on one deterministic open-source engine. Best for Security teams that own their scanners and want CTEM validation without a rip-and-replace, Red teams needing deterministic, replayable attack path validation with evidence artifacts, CTEM program leads who must show stakeholders findings tied to validation status. Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table.
What is Flyto Core?
Flyto Core — Flyto2 pairs a visual MCP and workflow builder with a source-available CTEM security platform, both running on one deterministic open-source engine. Best for Security teams that own their scanners and want CTEM validation without a rip-and-replace, Red teams needing deterministic, replayable attack path validation with evidence artifacts, CTEM program leads who must show stakeholders findings tied to validation status. Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table.
Flyto2 is one engine sold as two product lines. Flyto2 Flow is the automation side: you describe a job in plain language or assemble it drag-and-drop in a visual MCP builder, and it runs through deterministic modules rather than unbounded generated code. There are 466 modules across browser, API, data, files, cloud, AI, and notifications, and they're exposed to MCP-compatible clients as agent tools with inspectable parameters. Browser runs execute locally with evidence capture and replay on every step — record a checkout flow, edit one step, replay it. Flyto2 Warroom is the security side, in Beta: your existing scanners, ratings, threat feeds, repos, cloud exports, and asset inventories feed in as first-class inputs, get correlated into exposures, and the ones that matter get promoted into verified attack paths, with controlled pentest and red-team validation before a response team is mobilized. It covers nine security surfaces including ASM/EASM, code risk, MCP security, runtime/cloud, dark web, footprint, asset map, pentest, and red team. Both share the Apache-2.0 flyto-core runtime, the same YAML recipes, and one replay model. Warroom Community Edition is the free self-hosted baseline, distributed as public Docker images with Docker Compose, local JWT auth, and a local database — the application source repository is not public. Enterprise adds the governed bridge: commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, live remediation orchestration, AI proposal review, premium reports, advanced correlation, SSO/SAML/SCIM, RBAC, audit export, legal hold, retention, support SLAs, and airgap deployment. This is for security teams running a CTEM program, red teams that need replayable validation, and developers building custom YAML or MCP workflows — not for teams that want turnkey SaaS or a scanner replacement.
Key features
- Visual MCP builder with drag-and-drop workflow assembly
- Describe workflows in plain language, execute through deterministic modules
- 466 deterministic modules across browser, API, data, files, cloud, AI, and notifications
- Modules exposed as MCP-native agent tools with inspectable parameters
- Local browser execution with step-by-step evidence and replay on every run
- Record a browser flow, edit one step, then replay it
- YAML recipes shared across Flow and Warroom on the flyto-core runtime
- Apache-2.0 flyto-core open-source execution kernel for recipes, trace, replay, and evidence
- BYO finding intake from ASM, EASM, SAST, DAST, CSPM, SIEM, threat feeds, repos, and asset data
- Correlate imported findings into exposures and verified attack paths
- Controlled pentest and red-team validation on selected findings
- Nine security surfaces: ASM/EASM, code risk, MCP security, runtime/cloud, dark web, footprint, asset map, pentest, red team
- Evidence-backed reporting tying findings to validation status and remediation context
- Self-hosted fielded deployment via Docker Compose with enterprise airgap mode
- Managed runner fleet execution (Enterprise)
Behind the verdict
Flyto2's bet is that execution should be inspectable. In Flow, you describe work in plain language or assemble it in a visual MCP builder, but the run goes through 466 deterministic modules — browser, API, data, files, cloud, AI, notifications — instead of unbounded generated code. That means I can look at a step, look at its parameters, and look at the evidence it left behind. Recording a browser flow, editing a single step, and replaying it is the demo they lead with, and it's the thing that actually matters: most automation tools give you a black box and a log line, this one gives you a step trace and replay artifacts. The MCP story is the same idea applied to agents — modules are exposed as MCP-native tools with inspectable parameters, so an MCP-compatible client can call them directly instead of getting a hand-wavy 'the agent can use your tools' pitch. Warroom is where the architecture earns its keep. It doesn't replace your ASM, EASM, SAST, or DAST scanners; it takes their output — plus ratings, threat feeds, repos, cloud exports, CMDB, SBOM, CSV, and API ingest — correlates it into exposures, and promotes the ones that matter into verified attack paths through controlled pentest and red-team workflows. That's the CTEM loop: continuous exposure discovery, validation, mobilization. Nine surfaces ship with it, including MCP security and dark web. Where I'd push back: Warroom is Beta, CE is self-hosted through Docker Compose with local JWT auth and a local database, and the application source repository is not public even though flyto-core is Apache-2.0. Enterprise-only code, commercial datasets, managed remediation, enterprise identity, offline licensing, support tooling, and premium cloud bridge execution stay gated, and premium write actions fail closed on missing license, denied role, connector error, or invalid evidence signature. Historical evidence survives credit exhaustion if you hold the right read capability — that's a good design choice — but if your program can't tolerate entitlement gates failing closed on writes, that's a real operational constraint, not a footnote. Fit-wise: security teams that already own their scanners and want validation with evidence artifacts, red teams that need deterministic replayable exercises, and developers who want YAML recipes and MCP tools on an open runtime. Not a fit for teams that won't run infrastructure, buyers who need the application repo public, non-technical users wanting zero-config security tooling, or anyone hoping to retire their existing scanners.
Limitations
- Warroom Community Edition is self-hosted via Docker Compose with local JWT auth and a local database, so you bring the infrastructure.
- The flyto-core runtime is open source, but the application source repository is not public and CE is distributed only through public Docker images and documentation.
- Enterprise capabilities — commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, live remediation orchestration, AI proposal review, premium reports, advanced correlation, SSO/SAML/SCIM, RBAC, audit export, legal hold, retention, support SLAs, and airgap deployment — stay gated behind capability and entitlement.
- Premium actions fail closed on missing license, denied role, connector error, or invalid evidence signature, and metered actions can be blocked when credits run out, though historical evidence and reports remain visible through the correct read capability.
- Warroom is still in Beta.
as of 2026-10-09
Researching Flyto Core? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Flyto Core still active?
Flyto Core is live · free plan; paid plans on request · last verified 20 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Flyto Core? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Flyto Core?
What people actually say about Flyto Core — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 3, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Flyto Core— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 20 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Flyto Core 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed link health
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed pricing page
- — changed switching out, limitations, switching in, summary, who should skip it, our verdict, setup time, features, description, pricing fit, hidden costs
- — changed description, features, summary, our verdict, who should skip it, who it suits, pricing tiers
Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Flyto Core cost in 2026?
Flyto Core: Free to start; it also has paid plans whose price we could not confirm — see the pricing table. Pricing last verified 20 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Flyto Core tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warroom Community Edition (CE) | Free | — | Security teams that want to evaluate a CTEM validation loop locally before buying managed capabilities, and have someone who can run Docker Compose.Adds: Free starting tier: self-hosted install from public Docker images, local JWT auth, local database, plus code intelligence, CTEM posture, evidence, scoring, reports, and compliance surfaces. |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | Enterprises that need commercial threat intelligence, managed fleets, live remediation orchestration, SSO/SAML/SCIM, audit export, retention, support SLAs, or airgap deployment.Adds: Adds the governed bridge over CE: commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, live remediation orchestration, AI proposal review, premium reports, advanced correlation, enterprise identity, audit export, legal hold, retention, SLAs, and airgap deployment. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Flyto Core's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
CE at $0 covers evaluation and small self-hosted CTEM loops — the cost is your infrastructure, not a license. Enterprise is custom-priced and is where the governed bridge lives: commercial threat intelligence, managed runner fleets, remediation orchestration, SSO/SAML/SCIM, audit export, and airgap. If you only need workflow and browser automation, Flow on the Apache-2.0 flyto-core runtime is the cheaper path; if you need managed validation without running anything, this isn't the tool.
Has Flyto Core's pricing changed?
No plan price for Flyto Core has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Flyto Core?
Pick Flyto Core if you are Security teams that own their scanners and want CTEM validation without a rip-and-replace, Red teams needing deterministic, replayable attack path validation with evidence artifacts, CTEM program leads who must show stakeholders findings tied to validation status, Developers building custom automation and security workflows with YAML recipes and MCP tools.
Look elsewhere if you are Teams that want fully managed SaaS and will not run their own infrastructure, Organizations hoping to replace their existing ASM, EASM, SAST, or DAST scanners, Buyers who require the application source repository to be public, Non-technical users looking for zero-configuration security tooling.
Skip it if Skip Flyto2 if you need a fully managed security SaaS and won't run your own Docker infrastructure, or if you expect the tool to replace the scanners you already own rather than ingest their output.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Flyto Core actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Install Warroom CE from public Docker images, point it at existing ASM/EASM exports, SAST/DAST results, and CMDB data, then correlate findings into exposures.
Outcome: A ranked exposure list where only the paths that survive validation get pushed into the response queue, with evidence attached to each finding.
Write a deterministic YAML recipe that records a browser-based attack path on a target asset, edit one step to vary the payload, and replay it under consent controls.
Outcome: Replayable per-step evidence for each exercise, tied to validation status rather than a narrative write-up.
Assemble a Flow workflow in the visual MCP builder, expose the browser, API, and data modules as MCP-native tools, and call them from an MCP-compatible client.
Outcome: Deterministic tool calls with inspectable parameters and a step trace, instead of generated code you can't audit.
Use cases
- Turn imported ASM and EASM findings into safe, replayable browser-based pentest evidence.
- Chain SAST and SCA results with runtime context to prove exploitability inside a CTEM program.
- Automate red-team exercises with deterministic YAML recipes that capture step-by-step evidence.
- Ingest threat feeds and dark web signals to prioritize attack paths for verification.
- Generate compliance-ready reports with verified attack paths and remediation status.
- Orchestrate remediation by pushing validated findings into Slack or ticketing systems.
- Build custom security and automation workflows in the visual Flow builder and expose them over MCP.
- Record and replay browser workflows with per-step evidence for checkout, form-fill, or data-extraction tasks.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Flyto Core — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Warroom CE: an afternoon to a day if you already run Docker — pull the public images, run Docker Compose, and wire local JWT auth against a local database. Flow: minutes for a first drag-and-drop workflow or a plain-language description run through deterministic modules, and roughly an hour to record and replay your first browser flow end to end. Enterprise bridge services take longer by
Switching to or from Flyto Core
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual browser QA: record the existing flow in Flow, edit one step, and replay it with per-step evidence instead of screenshots.
- →From a scripted RPA tool: port the steps into YAML recipes on the flyto-core runtime and expose them over MCP.
- →From spreadsheet-tracked findings: feed existing ASM/EASM, SAST, and CMDB exports into Warroom as first-class inputs and correlate into exposures.
- →From a SaaS-only CTEM tool: install Warroom CE from public Docker images to run the validation loop locally before attaching Enterprise services.
- ↗To a turnkey SaaS security platform: if you won't run Docker infrastructure, CE is the wrong shape and a hosted vendor is the exit.
- ↗To your existing scanner stack: Warroom is designed to complement ASM, EASM, SAST, and DAST, so scanner output flows back to the tools you already own.
- ↗To a public-source fork: the application source repo isn't public, so a fork path only exists for the Apache-2.0 flyto-core runtime, not the Warroom application.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Flyto Core”, and we withheld 6: 6 did not mention Flyto Core. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Flyto Core.
Official links
What are the best Flyto Core alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Flyto Core we list are MaxKB, FastGPT and Activepieces. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaxKB | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| FastGPT | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Activepieces | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Flyto Core
View all
MaxKB
MaxKB: open-source, self-hosted RAG knowledge base and enterprise agent platform with visual workflows
FastGPT
FastGPT is an open-source RAG platform and visual AI agent builder you can self-host, with SSO, RBAC, and LLM auditing.
Activepieces
Open-source AI automation: chat a workflow into agents, tables, and 770+ app connections you can self-host.
Tools that pair well with Flyto Core
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Flyto Core, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
MaxKB
MaxKB: open-source, self-hosted RAG knowledge base and enterprise agent platform with visual workflows
FastGPT
FastGPT is an open-source RAG platform and visual AI agent builder you can self-host, with SSO, RBAC, and LLM auditing.
Activepieces
Open-source AI automation: chat a workflow into agents, tables, and 770+ app connections you can self-host.
Flyto Core vs its closest rival
Flyto Core's closest head-to-head is with Audioeye — Flyto Core and AudioEye serve completely different domains: security validation vs. accessibility compliance. Flyto Core is best for security teams who need an open-source orchestration engine to validate attack paths with deterministic evidence, while AudioEye is a compliance-focused platform for ADA/WCAG. The choice depends entirely on whether your priority is security testing or accessibility remediation. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Flyto Core vs Audioeye
Flyto Core and AudioEye serve completely different domains: security validation vs. accessibility compliance. Flyto Core is best for security teams who need an open-source orchestration engine to validate attack paths with deterministic evidence, while AudioEye is a compliance-focused platform for ADA/WCAG. The choice depends entirely on whether your priority is security testing or accessibility remediation.
GeneratedFlyto Core vs Sublime Security
Choose Flyto Core if you need an open-source, deterministic validation engine to orchestrate and replay security tests across your existing scanners, especially for CTEM and red-teaming workflows. Choose Sublime Security if your primary pain is advanced email threats (BEC, VEC, phishing) and you want an AI-driven, low-false-positive solution that integrates directly with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. They serve different domains; the choice depends on whether your priority is cross-stack security validation or focused email defense.
GeneratedFlyto Core vs Push Security
If your priority is defending against browser-based AI attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, data leakage to LLMs) with real-time controls and agentic hunting, Push Security wins. If you need a self-hosted, open-source automation engine to validate attack paths from existing scanners with replayable evidence, Flyto Core is the choice. Both are freemium, but serve different security postures.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Used Flyto Core? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.