Hackerai vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-24
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHackeraiPush Security
PricingFreemium (paid tiers undisclosed)Freemium (paid tiers undisclosed)
Primary FocusAI-powered vulnerability scanning for codeBrowser-based attack detection & AI tool security
Target UserDevelopers & DevOpsSecurity & identity teams
Key DifferentiatorConversational chat interface for remediationReal-time browser telemetry + agentic threat hunting
Integration BreadthGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Jira, VS Code, Jenkins, CircleCI, CI/CD toolsOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Recent NewsNo recent security-specific news; articles about Hacker News trends (Jun 2026)Experienced poisoned tenant attack (2026-06-26); advocates browser controls over training

Choose Push Security if your primary threat is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, session hijacking) and unmanaged AI tool usage by employees. Choose Hackerai if your need is code-level vulnerability scanning with conversational remediation for developers. They address entirely different attack surfaces and are complementary, not competitive.

Try HackeraiTry Push Security
Hackerai
Hackerai

AI-powered penetration testing assistant to find and fix vulnerabilities through conversation

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security for the AI era: detect and block AI-powered attacks.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$29/mo
$99/mo
Custom
$5/user/month (annual) or monthly per user
Custom
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
—
Web
Categories
🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
AI-powered vulnerability scanning
Conversational remediation guidance
Support for Python, JavaScript, Go, and more
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket integration
Real-time security feedback during development
Custom rule creation
Automated dependency scanning
Secret detection (API keys, tokens)
OWASP Top 10 coverage
Exportable reports
Team collaboration workspaces
CI/CD pipeline integration: Jenkins, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
Slack and Jira integration
VS Code integration
API access (Enterprise)
AitM / reverse-proxy phishing detection
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Slack
Jira
VS Code
Jenkins
CircleCI
GitHub Actions
GitLab CI
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Webhooks
REST API

Who should pick which

  • Security team protecting against browser-based attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security specifically detects and blocks AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious extensions using real-time browser telemetry and agentic hunting.

  • Developer wanting quick code vulnerability fixes
    Pick: Hackerai

    Hackerai’s chat interface explains vulnerabilities in plain language and guides step-by-step remediation, ideal for developers without deep security expertise.

  • DevOps engineer integrating security into CI/CD
    Pick: Hackerai

    Hackerai integrates natively with GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, and GitLab CI, enabling automated scanning in pipelines.

  • Identity team hardening MFA/SSO adoption
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides in-browser guardrails for MFA registration and password changes, and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS.

  • Organization securing AI tool usage by employees
    Pick: Push Security

    Push offers real-time visibility into AI tool usage, controls clipboard/file uploads, and blocks malicious OAuth grants to prevent data leakage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Hackerai vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your primary threat is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, session hijacking) and unmanaged AI tool usage by employees. Choose Hackerai if your need is code-level vulnerability scanning with conversational remediation for developers. They address entirely different attack surfaces and are complementary, not competitive.

Can Push Security detect code vulnerabilities?

No, Push Security focuses on browser-based threats (phishing, session hijacking, AI tool misuse), not code scanning. For code vulnerabilities, use Hackerai.

Does Hackerai protect against phishing attacks?

No, Hackerai is a code security scanner. It does not detect phishing, session hijacking, or browser-based attacks.

Which tool integrates with Okta?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, and other identity providers. Hackerai does not mention Okta integration.

Which tool is better for CI/CD pipelines?

Hackerai is designed for CI/CD with integrations to GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, etc. Push Security does not have CI/CD integrations.

Are there on-premises deployment options?

Push Security is cloud-based; Hackerai also appears cloud-based. Neither mentions on-premises support.

Do both tools offer free tiers?

Yes, both are freemium. Exact free tier limits are not provided in the data.

Which tool has better recent news relevance?

Push Security has recent blogs about real-world attack experience and AI security maturity (Jun 2026). Hackerai’s latest news is about Hacker News trends, not product updates.

Can I use both tools together?

Yes, they address different security layers (browser vs code). Using both provides comprehensive coverage against external attacks and application vulnerabilities.

More Hackerai or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

Hackerai
View Hackerai reviewHackerai alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026