Ida Pro Mcp vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Ida Pro Mcp | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Best for | Reverse engineers and malware analysts | Security teams securing browser-based attacks and AI usage |
| Key features | AI-assisted disassembly analysis, IDAPython integration, MCP protocol support | AiTM phishing detection, session hijacking block, AI tool DLP, agentic threat hunting |
| Integrations | IDA Pro | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Deployment | Plugin for IDA Pro (desktop) | Cloud-based browser extension |
| LATEST NEWS | No recent news | 2026: Push published on poisoned tenant attacks, AI security maturity model, and agentic threat hunting |
Open-source MCP server that exposes your IDA Pro database to Claude Code, Cursor and other LLM clients for AI-assisted reverse engineering
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Ida Pro Mcp vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Ida Pro Mcp
46 mentions across 4 sources · 62% positive — mixed (weighted across 4 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Full MCP bridge letting Claude, Cursor, VS Code, and Zed drive IDA directly rather than via chat window
- • Write-back tools (comments, renames, byte patches, type declarations) let LLM suggestions land in the IDB
- • Headless idalib-mcp server with persistent database workers enables remote/team workflows via SSE
- • int_convert tool explicitly prevents LLM number-base hallucinations, a real-world reversing pain point
What frustrates them
- • Requires paid IDA Pro 8.3+ and Python 3.11+ — unusable for Ghidra/radare2-only analysts
- • OpenAI blocks or warns on IDA/MCP reverse-engineering tasks; provider policy is a real workflow risk
- • Setup spans 20+ MCP clients and config paths, with history of client-specific misconfiguration bugs
- • Best output depends heavily on prompting skill — vague prompts waste tokens and time
Researched Sep 14, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team at a mid-size companyPick: Push Security
Push provides visibility and real-time blocking against AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and AI data leakage across all browsers, without requiring a browser migration.
- Malware analyst reversing a complex samplePick: Ida Pro Mcp
Ida Pro Mcp offers AI-assisted contextual Q&A inside IDA Pro, speeding up analysis of disassembly and decompilation for experienced reverse engineers.
- Identity and access management (IAM) teamPick: Push Security
Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins, aligning with IAM goals.
- Vulnerability hunter in binary exploitationPick: Ida Pro Mcp
Ida Pro Mcp helps analyze disassembly for vulnerabilities by answering questions about program logic, integrated within IDA Pro.
- Solo founder with no security teamPick: Push Security
Push Security's free tier provides essential browser attack protection and AI tool visibility without needing a dedicated team, though full features may require payment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Push Security replace an enterprise browser?
No, Push works across existing browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox) as an extension, not a replacement. It adds security controls without forcing a browser switch.
Does Ida Pro Mcp require an internet connection?
Yes, because it connects to an MCP-compatible language model (e.g., Claude) via API, so an active internet connection is needed for AI queries.
What is the freemium pricing for Push Security?
Exact pricing is not disclosed; freemium implies basic features are free, with paid plans for advanced capabilities like agentic threat hunting and AI DLP.
Is Ida Pro Mcp compatible with all IDA Pro versions?
It relies on IDAPython API, so it should work with IDA Pro 7.x and later, but compatibility depends on the specific version and IDAPython support.
Does Push Security detect AI tool usage?
Yes, it provides real-time AI tool inventory and usage control, including clipboard and file upload DLP for AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude.
Can Ida Pro Mcp analyze mobile app binaries?
Yes, if IDA Pro supports the architecture (e.g., ARM for iOS/Android), Ida Pro Mcp can assist in analyzing the disassembly.
What type of attacks does Push block in real time?
AiTM phishing, ClickFix/ConsentFix attacks, session hijacking, malicious OAuth apps, and credential theft, among others.
Does Ida Pro Mcp support custom AI models?
Yes, it is model-agnostic via the MCP protocol; users can configure any MCP-compatible backend, including local models if they support MCP.
More Ida Pro Mcp or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026