Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source, Apache 2.0) | Freemium (free tier + paid plans) |
| Core Function | 817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents to automate tasks (IR, red teaming, auditing) | Detection and prevention of browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and AI tool governance |
| Target User | Security engineers & AI agent users automating cybersecurity tasks | Security teams needing browser defense & AI usage control |
| Deployment | CLI / Markdown files (works with Claude Code, Copilot, etc.) | Cloud-based (browser extension + telemetry collection) |
| Key Differentiator | Largest open-source library (817 skills) mapped to 6 frameworks | Real-time browser visibility + agentic threat hunting across all browsers |
| LATEST NEWS Impact | 2026-06-24: GitHub repo lists 817 skills for AI agents | 2026-06-26: Push experienced a poisoned tenant attack itself, publishing lessons learned; 2026-06-02: AI regulation compliance requires browser visibility |
For security teams needing to detect and stop browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and govern AI tool use, Push Security is the clear choice. For security engineers and penetration testers who want to supercharge AI agents with structured, framework-aligned playbooks (817 skills), Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is the cost-effective, open-source complement. They are not direct substitutes—Push is a detection/response platform, Anthropic is a skill library—and many teams will benefit from both.
Open-source library of 817 structured cybersecurity skill files your AI coding agent loads on demand, mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and licensed Apache 2.0.
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills
18 mentions across 5 sources · 45% positive — mixed (weighted across 5 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • 817 skills across 29 security domains, including serious depth in cloud (60) and threat hunting (55)
- • Every skill carries MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs; many map to NIST CSF 2.0 and ATLAS
- • Progressive disclosure keeps token cost low — ~40-token frontmatter before full workflow body loads
- • Works with Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, Codex CLI, and 20+ Markdown-reading agents
What frustrates them
- • Zero published field reports of the library used in a production SOC
- • Skill counts shift between videos (753 → 754 → 817), complicating versioning and audits
- • One open GitHub issue (Sept 2026) cites incomplete refs and incorrect ATT&CK mappings
- • Requires intermediate agent-config skills; beginners will struggle to wire it up
Researched Sep 14, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security operations leadPick: Push Security
Push provides real-time detection of AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking, plus AI tool visibility—critical for SOC teams defending against browser-based threats.
- AI agent user / security automation engineerPick: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills
With 817 structured skills mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, this library lets security engineers automate incident response, penetration testing, and audits using Claude Code or Copilot.
- Identity security teamPick: Push Security
Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA guards, detects ghost logins, and enforces password change guardrails—ideal for identity and access management teams.
- Penetration testerPick: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills
Skills include penetration testing workflows with CLI commands and MITRE ATT&CK references, enabling red teamers to leverage AI agents for structured attacks.
- AI governance officerPick: Push Security
Push provides AI tool inventory, usage policies, and data loss prevention for AI tools, helping meet AI regulatory compliance as noted in its 2026-06-02 news.
Frequently Asked Questions
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security: which should you choose?
For security teams needing to detect and stop browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and govern AI tool use, Push Security is the clear choice. For security engineers and penetration testers who want to supercharge AI agents with structured, framework-aligned playbooks (817 skills), Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is the cost-effective, open-source complement. They are not direct substitutes—Push is a detection/response platform, Anthropic is a skill library—and many teams will benefit from both.
Can Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills detect or block attacks?
No, it is a library of skill workflows for AI agents; it does not actively detect or block attacks. Push Security performs real-time detection and blocking.
Is Push Security a browser extension?
Yes, it uses browser telemetry via an extension, but it is not an enterprise browser—it works across all major browsers.
Do I need an AI agent to use Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills?
Yes, the skills are designed for AI agents like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, or Gemini CLI.
Does Push Security protect against AI-powered attacks?
Yes, it detects and blocks AiTM phishing, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking—often used with AI tools.
Can I use both tools together?
Yes, Push handles detection and prevention; Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills automates response and investigation tasks.
What frameworks are the Anthropic skills mapped to?
MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF, and MITRE F3.
Does Push Security integrate with my existing SIEM?
Yes, it integrates with Splunk and Snowflake, among others.
Is Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills officially supported by Anthropic?
No, it is a community-driven project and not affiliated with Anthropic.
More Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026