Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAnthropic Cybersecurity SkillsPush Security
PricingFree (open-source, Apache 2.0)Freemium (free tier + paid plans)
Core Function817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents to automate tasks (IR, red teaming, auditing)Detection and prevention of browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and AI tool governance
Target UserSecurity engineers & AI agent users automating cybersecurity tasksSecurity teams needing browser defense & AI usage control
DeploymentCLI / Markdown files (works with Claude Code, Copilot, etc.)Cloud-based (browser extension + telemetry collection)
Key DifferentiatorLargest open-source library (817 skills) mapped to 6 frameworksReal-time browser visibility + agentic threat hunting across all browsers
LATEST NEWS Impact2026-06-24: GitHub repo lists 817 skills for AI agents2026-06-26: Push experienced a poisoned tenant attack itself, publishing lessons learned; 2026-06-02: AI regulation compliance requires browser visibility

For security teams needing to detect and stop browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and govern AI tool use, Push Security is the clear choice. For security engineers and penetration testers who want to supercharge AI agents with structured, framework-aligned playbooks (817 skills), Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is the cost-effective, open-source complement. They are not direct substitutes—Push is a detection/response platform, Anthropic is a skill library—and many teams will benefit from both.

Try Anthropic Cybersecurity SkillsTry Push Security
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills

Open-source library of 817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents, MITRE-mapped and free.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
8 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
PluginCLI
Web
Categories
🕸️ Agent Frameworks & Orchestration🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
817 structured cybersecurity skills across 29 domains (June 2026)
Progressive disclosure: ~40-token YAML frontmatter, full workflow on demand
MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs in every skill
Mapped to NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF
Exact CLI commands and prerequisites in each workflow
Verification steps for confirming task completion
Works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI
Supports 20+ platforms that read structured Markdown
Install via npx, git clone, or manual copy
Apache 2.0 open-source license
Covers DFIR, threat hunting, cloud security, red teaming, OT/ICS
Community-driven with regular updates
CVE references included where applicable
No graphical interface, CLI-based operation
agentskills.io standard compatible
Behavioral phishing detection
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking
Session hijacking detection
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO guardrails
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Gemini CLI
OpenAI Codex CLI
Amp
Windsurf
Aider
Continue
Goose
Zed
Cline
Void
Cody
Kodu
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Slack
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills

26 mentions across 5 sources · 59% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Free and open-source under Apache 2.0 license
  • • Huge library: 817 skills across 29 security domains
  • • MITRE ATT&CK and NIST CSF mapping for easy compliance
  • • Progressive disclosure with 40-token YAML frontmatter minimizes token spend

What frustrates them

  • • Not affiliated with Anthropic despite the name
  • • No proof of real-world effectiveness in production security
  • • Product Hunt launch got zero upvotes, indicating limited community buzz
  • • Requires Node.js 18+ for npx install, a barrier for some

Researched Aug 15, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
  • • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
  • • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
  • • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.

What frustrates them

  • • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
  • • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
  • • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
  • • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.

Researched Aug 26, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security operations lead
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time detection of AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking, plus AI tool visibility—critical for SOC teams defending against browser-based threats.

  • AI agent user / security automation engineer
    Pick: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills

    With 817 structured skills mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, this library lets security engineers automate incident response, penetration testing, and audits using Claude Code or Copilot.

  • Identity security team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA guards, detects ghost logins, and enforces password change guardrails—ideal for identity and access management teams.

  • Penetration tester
    Pick: Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills

    Skills include penetration testing workflows with CLI commands and MITRE ATT&CK references, enabling red teamers to leverage AI agents for structured attacks.

  • AI governance officer
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides AI tool inventory, usage policies, and data loss prevention for AI tools, helping meet AI regulatory compliance as noted in its 2026-06-02 news.

Frequently Asked Questions

Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills vs Push Security: which should you choose?

For security teams needing to detect and stop browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking) and govern AI tool use, Push Security is the clear choice. For security engineers and penetration testers who want to supercharge AI agents with structured, framework-aligned playbooks (817 skills), Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is the cost-effective, open-source complement. They are not direct substitutes—Push is a detection/response platform, Anthropic is a skill library—and many teams will benefit from both.

Can Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills detect or block attacks?

No, it is a library of skill workflows for AI agents; it does not actively detect or block attacks. Push Security performs real-time detection and blocking.

Is Push Security a browser extension?

Yes, it uses browser telemetry via an extension, but it is not an enterprise browser—it works across all major browsers.

Do I need an AI agent to use Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills?

Yes, the skills are designed for AI agents like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, or Gemini CLI.

Does Push Security protect against AI-powered attacks?

Yes, it detects and blocks AiTM phishing, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking—often used with AI tools.

Can I use both tools together?

Yes, Push handles detection and prevention; Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills automates response and investigation tasks.

What frameworks are the Anthropic skills mapped to?

MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF, and MITRE F3.

Does Push Security integrate with my existing SIEM?

Yes, it integrates with Splunk and Snowflake, among others.

Is Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills officially supported by Anthropic?

No, it is a community-driven project and not affiliated with Anthropic.

More Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Explore each tool further

Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills
View Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills reviewAnthropic Cybersecurity Skills alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Agent Frameworks & Orchestration toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026